• blackbeans@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    France should just ignore this and apply the taxes anyway. The orange bully doesn’t know how to legally implement tariffs and he is way too busy trying to stay out of the Epstein controversy anyway.

  • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just do-it, Not only the tax on tech will help french economy and push people to use “local” solution, but the US trade tariff on french wine means that less Champagne will go to the US, which means less demand for the same offer, so cheaper price for Europeans. Price for Champagne and other decent wine raised way faster than inflation, and a 40 EUR bottle of bad champagne isn’t worth that much

  • Arras@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wait until Trump realises that France is in the EU and that you can’t tarriff France alone.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Someone should tell Trump tariffs on French wine will just boost sales of California wine. Maybe he hates California enough to back off.

    • wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      That would also result in wine being more environmentally friendly. Shipping liquid in heavy glass bottles is a carbon footprint nightmare, so people should be drinking wine as locally produced as possible.

      • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nah, humanity is really good at shipping. Locally sourced wine is only environmentally friendlier than shipping if you happen to live in a vintner.

        • vatlark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Unsurprisingly, that doesn’t seem to be true, but also the studies seem to arrive at pretty different numbers about how much worse it is.

          Some authors, such as Neto et al. (2013), show that the distribution of wine has a relatively small impact of 1.9% (0.05 kg CO2e/bottle of 750 ml) relative to the viticulture and wine bottling stages in the supply chain. Others, such as Bonamente et al. (2016), estimate the distribution of bottled wine to represent approximately 41.1% of the total life cycle emissions of wine at consumption.

          https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539526000866#t0005

          • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Exactly. Even in the worst case, it’s better to ship a bottle of wine from California to Canada, than try to use greenhouses to make a Canadian winery a reality.

  • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not sure how the volume of wine sales is, but it feels like BigTech has a way higher volume? On the other hand, it’s a 100% tariff vs a 3% tax…

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If France is facing tariffs, the EU is going to respond. That is playing trade war on “stupid” mode.

  • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    The French can sell their wine to the rest of the world. Ignore the orange man, he has no legitimacy to interfere in the French internal affairs.

  • sznowicki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s Paris and France towns in Poland. It’s a great news to those cities because now they can act as a bottler companies for all those French wines and keep the French labels and “produced and bottled in France” while bypassing the “Tarif on France” which is nonsense in itself.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh darn, no more collecting French wine in the cellar!?

    How fucking tone deaf is this. You don’t get to collect a sales tax on Internet services or else we will tax this luxury item.

    Who the fuck is Trumplethinskin working for here? It isn’t your average American getting some barefoot wine at the grocery store for fucks sake.

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    So, let me understand. His MAGAAs were trying to pair a nice Bordeaux or Châteauneuf-du-Pape with their Wagyu beef dinner, and noticed it was a little pricey? Is that what he’s fixing?

    Meanwhile, the EPSTEIN files have Trump’s name throughout them like a fungus in a flooded basement. Trump is a shit smear.

  • BigShammy80@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s so funny. Demanding a common tax for making profits with tech apparently is “unfair”. Must be his tech bro’s who are not happy. Probably he received a message: “We don’t wanna pay taxes, do something!”.

  • kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Secret environmentalist move by Trump. Wine is one of those products where I’ll never understand why it gets shipped around the world.

    You can produce good wine in NA. Same here: I am sitting between France’s and Germany’s best wine regions, but I can buy wine from South Africa, Australia and California?! Why?

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Trump tells France to scrap sales tax or else he’ll punish his own people with another tax instead.

    Every day is a tortured exercise to remain sane.