Eh, a cursory glance at their proposed policies is more than enough to convince me they’re fascist. Ethnic purity, ending welfare, rejecting non-classical art, rejecting international alliances, and for some reason making all kids eat red meat daily.
All of those things are either directly fascist or closely associated with modern fascist culture wars.
That’s entirely possible. I don’t agree with everything he says, and I’ve since learned from reliable sources of various disgusting comments made by him in person. But I’m still not going to use “Flamman” as a reliable source. They are not a reliable publication. And they are not taken seriously in Sweden.
It would be a bit like taking what “FOX News” says about US Democrats as a reliable source of unbiased information.
Fox News May be known for their opinion segments, but their journalism team is actually competent, and their polling teams are some of the best around.
Yeah that’s what I did. I looked up the OP policies, and rapidly identified them as almost certainly fascist. Which was the original question. Not the source credibility.
You do you. But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology. That has to be the dumbest shit I’ve heard today.
But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology.
Almost as dumb as rejecting someone based on their ideology alone? Or do you have any resources to prove their journalism is biased apart from that “they are socialists”. You have been out here for days shitting on this news paper “Flamman” that you yourself have admitted to hearing for the first time
Nor have I ever heard of this publication “Flamman”, that also claims to be some old socialist newspaper.
You have not presented a single source as to why they are biased apart from them being “socialists”. You have also been going around trying to shit on other resources as much as you can, blaming people of not providing enough resources and saying things like “misinformation is how propaganda spreads”. These are all applications of the “accusation in the mirror”.
I did thanks (and agree with ethical media violations presented here). The very fact that they are audited by a media ombudsmen however goes on to prove that your statement
“Flamman” however is closer to Alex Jones Info Wars
does not hold up. And the fact that nothing they have said in the previous article (i.e “parasites” or the donations) was fabricated remains.
Remigration is ethnic cleansing, basically going further than what Trump and ICE is doing in the USA right now. You don’t need to know more about them.
The other side of this is that Sweden is now 8.1% Muslim. It’s inevitable that people get fed up with this. No matter if it’s right or wrong, people hate it. Especially when the economic outlook is grim.
That is a very strong statement. What’s your source of them wanting to achieve an ethnic cleansing with forced deportation of Swedish citizens? Taking steps that go beyond Trumps ICE.
Yikes. I followed the sources listed and yeah, the dude is legit unhinged. Not only for what he wants, but that he also thinks it’ll be possible.
Things he suggest and wants require changes to the constitution. And changes to the constitution takes more than 4 years as it has to span over the next election cycle and be voted on (again) by the following elected government.
You know that’s the least credible source and literally, as biased as you can get. A self proclaimed “Socialist newspaper”.
How did we go from “don’t believe everything you see on the Internet” to “i’m gonna believe this is true because it says so on this website!”?
Eh, a cursory glance at their proposed policies is more than enough to convince me they’re fascist. Ethnic purity, ending welfare, rejecting non-classical art, rejecting international alliances, and for some reason making all kids eat red meat daily.
All of those things are either directly fascist or closely associated with modern fascist culture wars.
That’s entirely possible. I don’t agree with everything he says, and I’ve since learned from reliable sources of various disgusting comments made by him in person. But I’m still not going to use “Flamman” as a reliable source. They are not a reliable publication. And they are not taken seriously in Sweden.
It would be a bit like taking what “FOX News” says about US Democrats as a reliable source of unbiased information.
Fox News May be known for their opinion segments, but their journalism team is actually competent, and their polling teams are some of the best around.
I’m sure they are. But you would look for other sources to confirm or deny. Because you know they are known to be biased.
“Flamman” however is closer to Alex Jones Info Wars than FOX News. Minus the peddeling of protein shakes or whatever it was
Yeah that’s what I did. I looked up the OP policies, and rapidly identified them as almost certainly fascist. Which was the original question. Not the source credibility.
I trust socialists way more than I trust capitalists. Socialists want to liberate the world, capitalists want to enslave it.
You do you. But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology. That has to be the dumbest shit I’ve heard today.
Almost as dumb as rejecting someone based on their ideology alone? Or do you have any resources to prove their journalism is biased apart from that “they are socialists”. You have been out here for days shitting on this news paper “Flamman” that you yourself have admitted to hearing for the first time
You have not presented a single source as to why they are biased apart from them being “socialists”. You have also been going around trying to shit on other resources as much as you can, blaming people of not providing enough resources and saying things like “misinformation is how propaganda spreads”. These are all applications of the “accusation in the mirror”.
Sure. Have i rejected something on the sole basis of someones ideology? No.
The fact they are a political publication means by definition that they’re biased.
If they weren’t, they’d be politically neutral.
It’s sad, that this has to be explained to you.
I did indeed hear about them for the first time recently, and the more i learned about them. The worse it got. They’re not considered reliable
Yes you have rejected the credibility of a publisher you have encountered for the first time solely based on their ideology.
Provide resources about what you have learned about them.
https://medieombudsmannen.se/beslut/flamman-klandras-for-skadande-rattelse-om-skolentreprenoren-barbara-bergstrom/
https://medieombudsmannen.se/beslut/mediernas-etiknamnd-klandrar-flamman-for-text-i-nyhetsbrev/
Enjoy
I did thanks (and agree with ethical media violations presented here). The very fact that they are audited by a media ombudsmen however goes on to prove that your statement
does not hold up. And the fact that nothing they have said in the previous article (i.e “parasites” or the donations) was fabricated remains.
Remigration is ethnic cleansing, basically going further than what Trump and ICE is doing in the USA right now. You don’t need to know more about them.
The other side of this is that Sweden is now 8.1% Muslim. It’s inevitable that people get fed up with this. No matter if it’s right or wrong, people hate it. Especially when the economic outlook is grim.
That is a very strong statement. What’s your source of them wanting to achieve an ethnic cleansing with forced deportation of Swedish citizens? Taking steps that go beyond Trumps ICE.
That is what remigration means. See the sources on the wikipedia page. I doubt they’d put out such a blatant lie.
Yikes. I followed the sources listed and yeah, the dude is legit unhinged. Not only for what he wants, but that he also thinks it’ll be possible.
Things he suggest and wants require changes to the constitution. And changes to the constitution takes more than 4 years as it has to span over the next election cycle and be voted on (again) by the following elected government.