• darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    If only it were just dudes. My mom is like this. I can get her to agree with that things need to be better and that social spending is good but… when I explain to her that we need to tax billionaires to do that suddenly it’s “BUT THEY EARNED THEIR MONEY! WE SHOULDN’T TAKE IT FROM THEM!!!”

    • The classic circular reasoning.

      “They’re rich because they worked hard for that money so they earn it. How do you know they worked hard? Because they’re rich of course. If they didn’t work hard they wouldn’t be rich!”

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        yup! i worked my ass off, and a very generous expected audience for my book is maybe 4000 to 5000, over the course of the next 20 years. not per year, total.

        and i would not change a word of it.

    • Dookieman12@piefed.socialBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ask her why that line of thinking doesn’t apply to her. She earned her money. Why should they take it?

      • darthelmet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I do try to explain that, but she just won’t listen. It’s like there’s a mental block stopping the connection from happening.

        The crazy thing is she’s worked insanely hard in her career and until a couple years ago barely made any money from it. (Although some of that is the gender inequality of her being out of work to take care of us when we were young for a few years.) She doesn’t understand how her being this hardworking professional who still only makes enough for half of a middle class income is different than someone who’s never worked a day in their life siphoning money off of workers so they can buy their 3rd mansion, private jets, and elections and somehow still has MORE money after all of that.

      • darthelmet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Huh. This turned out to be a more complicated answer than I thought. My parents were born in the mid 60s. Lead paint was banned in 1978, so they would have been in their teens. Lead gasoline, on the other hand, was gradually phased out starting in 1973, so a little earlier, but shockingly wasn’t completely banned until literally the month I was born, Jan 1996.

        Lead pipes are even more wild. NEW installations were banned in 1974, but it allowed existing ones to stay in.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, but they own them by preventing changes that would benefit themselves. So I’m not really sure if that owning is what you really want, Cletus van Yokel.

    • FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They want other people to suffer, not themselves (chudservatives)

      Only when the pain is too great for them too when they also start suffering and crying from the consequences

  • kboos1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    In 2024 there were a lot of Trump flags in my area. In 2026 there are 2, one is hanging from an overgrown bush outside of an old mobile home that has no less than 3 cars that haven’t moved in many years, the other is in an open field next to a storage unit facility that looks like it’s been abandoned.

    I have to say that in both cases it’s a perfect example of what’s left of the Trumpers delusional support of something that they can not begin to comprehend and that they will never know just how far they really are from the truth. They don’t understand that just because he speaks the same hateful words doesn’t mean that they are a part of his world.

    • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve noticed more trump supporters taking down those Flags, not because they don’t support trump but because they don’t want their house vandalized

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The amount of Talarico signs I’ve seen in deep rural Texas towns has been shocking. I don’t think I’ve seen a single Paxton sign in a yard.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’ll vote for the next one. Guaranteed.

      Racism and hatred of the other and they’re all in. Doesn’t matter who speaks it into a mic as long as the ® is there.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    But getting your face stomped on by the boot of wealthy elites repeatedly until the day you die because you have been bred to believe they are your betters is the American way.

  • DudeImMacGyver@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I make more than double that and spend tons of time online: Tax these rich assholes their due so they’re paying their fair share like the rest of us.

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is this meme assuming that everyone who disagrees with you politically is poorer than you, and making fun of them for earning less? I feel like this is rooted in a misconception of “people get paid according to their intelligence” - and the reverse: “STUPID people who i disagree with deserve to have their labour exploited.”

    But I could be wrong…?

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it’s about bootlickers who mistakenly associate themselves with the ultra rich who start crying when anyone suggests increasing taxes on the actually rich people.

      • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I’ll write it off as an overanalysis and over-reaction on my part. I’m too sensitive to low earnings being presented in a negative light

          • Da Oeuf@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Perhaps even more relevant is that when when people are desperate/afraid/confused they look to strength and power to solve their problems. I can’t remember the name of it but it’s a documented psychosocial phenomenon. It is essentially being a sycophant or bootlicker but the academics have a more neutral term for it.

  • Waterpumpee@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Problem really is though parties promising money for the poor take it from the middle. Middle (or the left’s definition of rich here) starts at 60k. Election interviewers would specifically ask this. Well, this is apparently not the democratic will.

    I’m not saying the other “side” is better but this drives alot of people away from leftish parties.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    that’s not fair. those rich 30killionaires may be whiny, but some of them whine that millionaires and billionaires should actually contribute to society. being a 30killionaire is rough, i don’t blame them for whining.