cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/70841923
And among tech oligarchs, Bezos is all too typical. Peter Thiel, for one, once revealed that his three best ideas for achieving true freedom are “cyberspace”, “outerspace” and “seasteading” (the idea of building new countries on floating oil rigs). In other words, this man, whose enormous wealth affords him access to the most spectacular settings our planet has to offer, actually believes these three cold, dead places are superior to the Earth we have, verdant and alive.
Something similar seems amiss with Elon Musk, a man who seems to look up at the wonders of the night sky and see only opportunities to fill that inky unknown with his own space junk. The venerable novelist Joyce Carol Oates highlighted these apparent limits in the fall of 2025 when she roasted him ruthlessly on his own platform, X.
“So curious,” she wrote, “that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates – scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter [X] may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.’”
The observation clearly got under the tech baron’s notoriously thin skin: he called her “a lazy liar” and began posting approvingly about various movies to prove Oates wrong.



If you can’t sustain yourself on a planet made to sustain you then any idea is dead on arrival anyways.
Except the planet wasn’t “made” to sustain us.
We developed to be able to sustain ourselves on the other things that developed to sustain themselves on this planet.
You want to go on a technicality? Life is an abomination only capable of being created in specific conditions. You and everything on this planet is an abomination.
“Abomination” is your reaction to the phenomenon.
One could just as easily say, “Life is a miracle only capable of being created in specific conditions.”
But I prefer to avoid demonizing or glorifying natural phenomena. Life is a result of natural processes.
So natural thats why there are so many planets full of life. Its a lucky coincidence based on very specific set conditions. You’re more likely to get hit by a lightning bolt than you are to get a natural sequence that leads to life. It’s a sliver of a fraction. Abomination isnt always negative just your bias human perspective leads to it being negative.
Thank you. I feel seen now
No, but I do hate this homo/sapiocentric view many have, that this planet was “made for us”, establishing a weird ownership mentality, presuming that humans own everything out there, when in reality we’re just short term tenants on this world. Some humility, accepting that humans are just a small, almost insignificant gear in this big machine, would go incredibly far.
Well we are the biggest parasites on the planet so whether you like it or not we made it for us.
So you gave up on fixing that and embraced the harmful, selfish narrative instead?
We can do better.
Im sorry but, the billionaires dont want that type of life for you and me. Almost like you and everyone that thinks they can change it are living a dream. The world works on money. You want evidence? Climate change is bad guess what? A.I companies dont give a shit about it theyre so obsessed theyre willing to fuel the climate disaster even further.
If they want to experience the hardships of Martian life, they can try to live in the Sahara.
Needs more rust