cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/70841923
And among tech oligarchs, Bezos is all too typical. Peter Thiel, for one, once revealed that his three best ideas for achieving true freedom are “cyberspace”, “outerspace” and “seasteading” (the idea of building new countries on floating oil rigs). In other words, this man, whose enormous wealth affords him access to the most spectacular settings our planet has to offer, actually believes these three cold, dead places are superior to the Earth we have, verdant and alive.
Something similar seems amiss with Elon Musk, a man who seems to look up at the wonders of the night sky and see only opportunities to fill that inky unknown with his own space junk. The venerable novelist Joyce Carol Oates highlighted these apparent limits in the fall of 2025 when she roasted him ruthlessly on his own platform, X.
“So curious,” she wrote, “that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates – scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter [X] may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.’”
The observation clearly got under the tech baron’s notoriously thin skin: he called her “a lazy liar” and began posting approvingly about various movies to prove Oates wrong.
Any American billionnaire who wants to experience the inhospitability of outer space is perfectly capable of moving to northern Alaska. You are welcome to experiment with grueling cold, impossible supply lines, long periods of isolation and a climate that actively tries to kill you and your machinery, while enjoying the tutorial level bonuses of a breathable atmosphere, a magnetosphere, and an eminently purchasable American administration both at the Red State level and the Federal level, that will let you do whatever the fuck you want. If you can’t make that in a techno utopia, shut, and I can’t stress it enough, the fuck up.
If you can’t sustain yourself on a planet made to sustain you then any idea is dead on arrival anyways.
Except the planet wasn’t “made” to sustain us.
We developed to be able to sustain ourselves on the other things that developed to sustain themselves on this planet.
You want to go on a technicality? Life is an abomination only capable of being created in specific conditions. You and everything on this planet is an abomination.
Life is an abomination only capable of being created in specific conditions.
“Abomination” is your reaction to the phenomenon.
One could just as easily say, “Life is a miracle only capable of being created in specific conditions.”
But I prefer to avoid demonizing or glorifying natural phenomena. Life is a result of natural processes.
Thank you. I feel seen now
No, but I do hate this homo/sapiocentric view many have, that this planet was “made for us”, establishing a weird ownership mentality, presuming that humans own everything out there, when in reality we’re just short term tenants on this world. Some humility, accepting that humans are just a small, almost insignificant gear in this big machine, would go incredibly far.
Well we are the biggest parasites on the planet so whether you like it or not we made it for us.
So you gave up on fixing that and embraced the harmful, selfish narrative instead?
We can do better.
If they want to experience the hardships are Martian life, they can try to live in the Sahara.
Needs more rust
This is a beautiful article. Scary. But beautiful. And the framing of the techno-oligarchs as people incapable of feeling awe is new to me, but makes a lot of sense. Thanks for posting.
I have a generally bleak outlook right now and I really needed to read this. Lit a little flame of fight for a better future.
I watched an interview with the authors by NYT on YT yesterday and felt the same thing. Calling them out, putting labels on what’s happening is helpful.
To see this printed in an actual paper and not some leftie 'zine is pretty amazing. It gives me hope we might be able to turn the corner.
I wonder if they realize Mars has far less protection from lethal radiation levels
I wonder if they realize that if they can send a rocket full of people to Mars, others can send a rocket full of shrapnel to Mars.
what do you mean, it’s literally the opposite. it’s got more protection and the best oxygen ever. no suits are needed once landing.
Also so many robot butlers









