cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/70841923

And among tech oligarchs, Bezos is all too typical. Peter Thiel, for one, once revealed that his three best ideas for achieving true freedom are “cyberspace”, “outerspace” and “seasteading” (the idea of building new countries on floating oil rigs). In other words, this man, whose enormous wealth affords him access to the most spectacular settings our planet has to offer, actually believes these three cold, dead places are superior to the Earth we have, verdant and alive.

Something similar seems amiss with Elon Musk, a man who seems to look up at the wonders of the night sky and see only opportunities to fill that inky unknown with his own space junk. The venerable novelist Joyce Carol Oates highlighted these apparent limits in the fall of 2025 when she roasted him ruthlessly on his own platform, X.

“So curious,” she wrote, “that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates – scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter [X] may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.’”

The observation clearly got under the tech baron’s notoriously thin skin: he called her “a lazy liar” and began posting approvingly about various movies to prove Oates wrong.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Except the planet wasn’t “made” to sustain us.

      We developed to be able to sustain ourselves on the other things that developed to sustain themselves on this planet.

      • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You want to go on a technicality? Life is an abomination only capable of being created in specific conditions. You and everything on this planet is an abomination.

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          No, but I do hate this homo/sapiocentric view many have, that this planet was “made for us”, establishing a weird ownership mentality, presuming that humans own everything out there, when in reality we’re just short term tenants on this world. Some humility, accepting that humans are just a small, almost insignificant gear in this big machine, would go incredibly far.

    • apftwb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If they want to experience the hardships are Martian life, they can try to live in the Sahara.

  • artifex@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is a beautiful article. Scary. But beautiful. And the framing of the techno-oligarchs as people incapable of feeling awe is new to me, but makes a lot of sense. Thanks for posting.

    • Philote@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I have a generally bleak outlook right now and I really needed to read this. Lit a little flame of fight for a better future.

      • EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I watched an interview with the authors by NYT on YT yesterday and felt the same thing. Calling them out, putting labels on what’s happening is helpful.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      To see this printed in an actual paper and not some leftie 'zine is pretty amazing. It gives me hope we might be able to turn the corner.

  • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I wonder if they realize Mars has far less protection from lethal radiation levels