• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    The EU was originally supposed to be called the United States of Europe, but in the end the name European Union was chosen instead.

    It was also originally supposed to be a federation, again more closely resembling the US.

    These are among the first things you can read when entering the Parlamentarium next to the European Parliament building in Brussels.

    Entry is completely free if you’re ever in the area.

  • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    No, thanks.

    We need to become more like Switzerland, not America. Direct democracy is the way, fire all unelected bureaucrats!

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      We need to become more like Switzerland

      Support all possible genocides and war criminals while claiming neutrality?

      • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Political system ≠ Political position

        But if we go down that way, the USA isn’t an example to follow either, as it has taken even worse positions.

  • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    7 days ago

    European Union is a much better name. So lets continue with the integration.

    A few things to start:

    • Commission should be directly elected by the people
    • Parliament should take more responsibility and agency
    • Parliament limitations should be lifted
    • The council should gradually abdicate to the parliament
    • Rigid rules for term limits for all elected EU officials for all institutions.

    There are more and the road is long, but it is the right direction.

    • libewa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The commission doesn’t need direct elections, but at least it should be elected by the EP and not around three corners (citizens -> national parliaments -> national governments -> commission), each of which including bribery and lobbying.

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      There are more and the road is long, but it is the right direction.

      Doubt. Every attempt in history to centralise power in Europe has failed

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Which attempts have been similar to the EU, and not just conquests? The closest I can think of is maybe the Habsburg dynasty, and I think we can agree that that had its own unique issues going on

        • deHaga@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Napoleon is the closest. A lot of the legal, judicial, and administrative civil code remains today.

        • deHaga@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          If it ends up with a president then it’s fucked. Single point of failure. A honeycomb structure of separate cells is much stronger and harder to take over, unlike a blob

  • Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    The USA is a model of excess, inequality and brutality. What kind of a lunatic uses that language or even role model? This is absolute fangirl language and doesn’t belong in civilised society.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      For what it’s worth, there have been many United States that aren’t the US of America. Mexico’s full name is United Mexican States, and historically there have been USes of Brazil, Belgium, Colombia, Indonesia, Central America, and a few more

      That said, I’m a native English speaker and the article is in Spanish. I don’t know if the original Spanish has an implication of “be like the USA” or if it’s just a way to say “Federalised EU”

      • Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fair points. In the Anglosphere, there are groups called Volta using this exact same phrase. The even use imagery of racist genociders like Winston Churchill in their promotional material. They call themselves progressive. I wish I was joking.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    No thanks.

    We don’t want to build the setup for fascists to take over like in the US.

    • TheMightyCat@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Why would a more integrated EU allow fascists to take over?

      The fascists are anti EU and currently seem to be rapidly gaining power in national governments.

        • TheMightyCat@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          While true, i think it would be harder for something like the AfD to take over the EU central government then the german national government.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            A few decades ago people used to think it would be hard for the fascists to take over the US, that they were a minority that wouldn’t gain popularity or a foothold in the different branches of government.

            Obviously, we were wrong. And the rise of the far-right in EU countries shows the same can still happen there.

            Having close ties with each other is good, helping each other is awesome, but centralizing power will only make it easier for it to be corrupted by fascism as climate change restricts global resources and the fascists are ready with their tired old scapegoats.

          • kaki@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Maybe for AfD, but fascists will always find a way. The RN in France always comes first in the EU parliament elections despite them being nationalistic anti-EU nazis spin-offs. If there’s a place of power they’ll try to get there. A “United States of Europe” would be a whole lot of uncessary risk.

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        US fascists are also anti-US from one point of view. Their plan seems to be tearing it down from the inside. The same playbook would work in the EU.

        I don’t know how to protect against fascism. But a United Europe would be a welcome addition to the world, I think.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Jesus, it’s just way to say it needs to be a federation with more centralized government. No one is saying we should copy any specific ideas from US.

    EU is falling behind because it’s unable to effectively work together for a common goal. Every country is constantly trying to protect its interests. We can’t stop Russians from entering EU because Italy and Spain is blocking it. We can’t ban gasoline cars because Germany is blocking it. More centralized government could solve those issues and let Europe compete with US and China.

    • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I agree that it’s needed in this day and age, when we are faced with dictators.

      However more centralized powers have historically led to war within Europe. Think about World war I and II, the Balkan wars, the Prussian wars, Napoleonic wars, the Seven years war, war of the Spanish succession and so on. This is the reason the EU is set up the way it is, all countries can influence decisions and there’s no dominant power overruling others. So it’s a bit of a double edged sword. Centralization helps to suppress cultural differences but doesn’t solve them.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Totally. I think huge progress was made in the last couple of decades but nationalism is still very strong in many countries and most people are still definitely not ready to put the good of Europe ahead of their national interests. Federation is needed but Europe is still not ready for it. Maybe in couple more decades but we’ll be lucky if EU survives for that long.