Maryam Alwan figured the worst was over after New York City police in riot gear arrested her and other protesters on the Columbia University campus, loaded them onto buses and held them in custody for hours.

But the next evening, the college junior received an email from the university. Alwan and other students were being suspended after their arrests at the “ Gaza Solidarity Encampment,” a tactic colleges across the country have deployed to calm growing campus protests against the Israel-Hamas war.

The students’ plight has become a central part of protests, with students and a growing number of faculty demanding their amnesty. At issue is whether universities and law enforcement will clear the charges and withhold other consequences, or whether the suspensions and legal records will follow students into their adult lives.

  • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    142
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If they’re unable to get a sealed record at trial, they will be required to disclose all charges leading to conviction on any employment or housing application they complete. It’s horribly prejudicial of our system to allow the assumption that those with convictions are unworthy of employment or housing.

    • @Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1017 months ago

      System working as intended. All of this was intended to keep minorities (most black ppl) in a perpetual state of incarceration. Only now the groups deemed undesirable have expanded. We could’ve fixed it decades ago but the majority of this country (white ppl) were fine with it because it didn’t affect them.

      The epitome of its not my problem until it is

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      317 months ago

      Bernie Sanders was arrested at protests in his youth, iirc. If there is any glimmer of hope in this shit storm, maybe in forty years a few of these students will be leading s political movement together as senators and representatives.

      • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        25
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s restrictive to working in the private sector and renting an apartment. There is no disqualification for criminal background for a member of government. Trump can be elected if he’s convicted of any or all of the charges he’s facing. He’d just be barred from voting in the election.

          • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            57 months ago

            If you simply gift Clarence an RV the Constitution is no obstacle to committing crimes against America.

          • ✺roguetrick✺
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Actually no. The supreme court’s decision explicitly said that clause was not self executing, meaning even someone convicted of treason cannot be disqualified without an act of Congress. It was one of the dumber decisions to come out of the court and that’s saying something.

        • nifty
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          Awesome, all of these arrested young folk should run for congress

          • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            77 months ago

            Disliking genocide puts them far above many congressmen already. Disliking it enough to be arrested is a great reason to vote for them.

            Unfortunately criminal arrests are only going to fuck up their lives. It takes a fuckload of money and backing to get into Congress.

        • @Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          I thought being a convicted felon prevented him from being on the ballot. Or maybe that was for primaries?

          • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            57 months ago

            Nope. It just stops him from voting. Treason would exclude him from holding office according to the Constitution, but he’s not charged with treason.

    • NoIWontPickAName
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      Not exactly a bad idea for the people doing something like hiring a pharmaceutical delivery driver to be able to check who they’re hiring.

      • @zbyte64
        link
        137 months ago

        What does protesting got to do with one’s risk of running a pharma heist?

        • NoIWontPickAName
          link
          fedilink
          57 months ago

          It’s horribly prejudicial of our system to allow the assumption that those with convictions are unworthy of employment or housing.

      • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Too many people worship the law as if it was the word of god. They don’t realize we are actually making this shit up as we go, and the laws can be changed at any moment.

        “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants”

        Thomas “I fucked Sally Hemings” Jefferson

      • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The first amendment has absolutely no references to permits. In fact it explicitly says you absolutely do not need anything, and that protests are legally protected free speech.

        You may protest all you want on public or federal land. I know. I routinely tell cops to “fuck off,” because I know where I happen to be standing. I have yet to be arrested for a protest that I attended, and I have never even attempted to get a permit.

        Privately owned property is the only place they can summarily arrest you, and that’s just a trespassing charge.

        • @TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Yeah keep reading. You’re given one fake right and there are 100 other laws. Just because you’re the right shade, telling a cop to F off, is a crime in itself even if they’re completely wrong. Most people would be arrested just for that.

          And that is the entire point. If “the law” is completely discretionary based on the encounter you have with the enforcers and the punishers (police, DA, judges, etc), then you have no rights. Step out of line and you’re in prison.

          The US is a shithole.

        • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Technically yes. In reality? Lmao. We’ve seen our first amendment right be abrogated time and again in the last 8 years.

        • @btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          You may protest all you want on public or federal land.

          Not in restricted areas like a military base or halls of congress.

    • @Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      487 months ago

      Trespassing. You have the right to assembly, but that doesn’t extend to anywhere, any time.

      These protestors could protest on the sidewalk, or get a permit and do a planned protest in a public park, or even work with the city to close roads for a planned march. As long as they kept it peaceful, police would have very little justification to arrest anyone.

      Instead, they are doing it on college campuses, or public roads without permission. And when they are told to leave, they refuse. At that point, you are trespassing, and the police are justified in arresting you.

      Civil disobedience grabs far more attention than protesting legally. We’re here talking about their cause because it made headlines due to civil disobedience. But activism has its costs.

    • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      307 months ago

      There are so many felonies in this country you basically commit a few every day by accident.

      • ɔiƚoxɘup
        link
        fedilink
        87 months ago

        Not for doubt, but because I can’t think of any, can you give examples? Were you just hyperbolizing?

        • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          57 months ago

          You can look it up, the federal code has over 5,200 crimes and that was over 2 years ago last I could find that someone counted. The average person unwittingly commits over 2 felonies a day.

            • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              67 months ago

              Small accounting errors, felony. Putting your pills into a reminder box and traveling accross straight line, felony. Accidentally drive an ATV or dirt bike onto unmarked federal land, felony. Delete CP of a used laptop, felony.

              The fact of the matter is any felony that is common to commit, are kind of boring. The federal code is so long and complex that you can find thousands of cases of people being unexpectedly tried for odd felonies. The federal code has become so cumbersome that no one actually knows the law until you’re in a court room with a bunch of lawyers paid to research that specific law.

          • ɔiƚoxɘup
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            Thanks for the suggestion! I looked it up and I feel a little bit more skeptical about your claim however I can see a number of those that could easily be trumped up or falsified especially things like injury to an officer and stuff like that.

            https://clarifacts.com/federal-crimes-list/

      • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        157 months ago

        When people were protesting unarmed black people getting murdered in 2020; Donald publicly told police to rough them up during arrests, sent out DHS in unmarked vans to snatch people off the streets, tear gassed a group of protesters so he could hold his little Bible upside down. There’s probably a bunch I am forgetting, it was a long fucking year.

        That was the same year his dimwitted response to the pandemic caused tens or hundreds of thousands more deaths than otherwise.

        He committed an insurrection. You want Repubs in power forever telling cops to beat the shit out of not only protestors, but voters? Go ahead with it.

          • Natanael
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            Republicans also says you can’t criticize Israel. (they will happily let you attack jews, but not the state Israel, because of their Christian extremist cults)

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      It’s a tactic to break the protest, scare the protesters into compliance. Arrest them all, haul them off to jail. Ruin their futures. Then drop charges since they do have the right to protest, but now they won’t anymore

  • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    877 months ago

    Holy shit the faculty against this need to strike immediately in solidarity. What the fuck sort of dystopia are we in that students are arrested and suspended for protesting? For protesting genocide? What the actual fuck.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      51
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Google called the police on and fired anyone remotely involved with the quiet sit-in in protest of Project Nimbus. No investigation, no finesse, nothing. Just straight up intimidation.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    497 months ago

    So if the snipers don’t kill them today, they won’t be able to get a job in 20 years.

    (I know exactly where that sniper at IU is standing and exactly where the protesters are and it is direct line-of-sight.)

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      But I was assured they weren’t snipers! Even though we should “treat them like snipers”? Umm so should I bring them coffee or call an artillery mission? Nobody told me whether they were friendly or enemy Not Snipers!?!

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        I’ve seen a more close-up view of the Ohio one which suggest that might not be a gun, but that is so clearly a gun in the IU one that it’s pretty damn hard to deny.

  • ✺roguetrick✺
    link
    fedilink
    467 months ago

    So listen, I’m not pro Hamas. Killing non settlers at a music festival is just terroristic murder and even killing random settlers is both counterproductive and terroristic even though most of them are very bad people. That said, this framing is ridiculous:

    Some demonstrations have included hate speech, antisemitic threats or support for Hamas, the group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, sparking a war in Gaza that has left more than 34,000 dead.

    Blaming Hamas for Israel’s slaughter is exactly the same as justifying Hamas’s actions. That’s very much a pro-genocide statement.

    • @klisklas@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      137 months ago

      Spot on! Fuck Hamas and all the terroristic acts against Jews and innocent lives. But one should also be able to recognise the ongoing crimes and genocide of the right wing Israeli government. Do they really think this war will lead to the destruction of Hamas or antisemitism in the region? I bet we will se double the amount of antisemites/terrorists in the future and nothing will have changed. The west is losing its face and the region was never further away from peace. Hamas trapped the Israeli government into a war and the Israeli extremists were more than happy to use the opportunity for this genocide. Seems like nobody is honestly interested in peace and the victims will be the Palistinian people and some festival goers.

  • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    377 months ago

    Wow, talk about trying to scare people into not protesting. However, it could have the opposite effect. Take away from the protestors and they have less to lose. They may start to shine a light on injustices at home, too.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        Weird. I protested on my campus in college and I wasn’t arrested or suspended.

        It’s almost like there’s a constitutional right to do so?

      • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        Yes, but most didn’t have consequences and managed to effect change. Even if it wasn’t as much change as they wanted.

        It looks like they are trying to use heavy handed tactics and fear, as well as self interest to quell the action. Its unlikely to work well as most are doing so selflessly.

        In fact it may embolden others rather than scare them off, or increase from a peaceful protest to having masks for anonymity etc.

        Yes, many suffered repercussions for Vietnam era protests bit they wear it with a badge of pride now and conscription is done politically. Mental health of personnel. Is also considered more, RHA is to protests and sympathy.

  • @sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    137 months ago

    Based solely on the over-reactions of the authorities, I’m guessing these protests are threatening a lot of money.

  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    137 months ago

    Lmao they thought suspending students for exercising their first amendment rights was going to calm things down? We have truly forgotten how to deal with protests in this country without resorting to authoritarianism.

    • @xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      To forget something you have to have known in the first place. The US has a very very long history of trying to smash protests with the law. All the way back to the whiskey rebellion and before.

      • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        Well the whole USofA as a nation is a violent protest in long form. Kinda hard to say they never knew the thing that started them.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        To be fair the Whiskey rebellion was more of an armed insurrection than a protest. But yeah, point taken.

  • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    127 months ago

    The first amendment? Never heard of it.

    Innocent until proven guilty? Pfffff, Arrest records are used to punish on the daily.

  • @mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    57 months ago

    Imagine living in a country where the government says fear the other party and their insurrectionists but let them go free and instead arrest protesters. But at least Biden wiggled in some last minute toothless bill about transgender people while “slaying” his opponent with name calling.

      • brianorca
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Not all of them have been peaceful, and it’s still private property and they can ask you to leave, with legal consequences if you don’t. And a lot of the rhetoric and chants have advocated violence.

    • Omega
      link
      fedilink
      177 months ago

      The consequence should be the inconvenience of protesting. Even if you’re willing to go to jail doesn’t mean you want to.

      • @Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        37 months ago

        No. But you wear your arrest like a badge of honor, not ask for your record to be cleaned so you can go back to your capitalist 9-5, and protest on weekends

      • NoIWontPickAName
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        I can give you plenty of reasons where it would be.

        To start with, you haven’t defined your terms.

        Is jailed actually jailed, or does book and release count?

        What is your definition of protest here?

        There are many things that have to be defined before you can try to pay you’re little word game there.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          87 months ago

          Wow, you’re a pedantic one.

          Is jailed actually jailed, or does book and release count?

          It you’re put in a jail, you’ve been jailed. Note: jail, not prison.

          What is your definition of protest here?

          What? I have never heard anyone need this defined for them. Look it up yourself.

          There are many things that have to be defined before you can try to pay you’re little word game there.

          You listed two thing, both well defined. I need you to define the word “defined,” “before,” and “word game” please. I can’t understand your comment.

          • NoIWontPickAName
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            My point is that what one person considers a peaceful protest, another can not.

            If it’s a 99% peaceful protest does it still count.

            For the record I understand your point to a point, but yes some people do deserve to be jailed for protesting genocide.

            Just like the people who think anortion is basically baby genocide and fire bomb abortion clinics deserve to go to jail

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              57 months ago

              Yeah, you didn’t say “peaceful” but also I’ve seen no evidence of violence from students in these protests. That said, I haven’t really kept up with it. Maybe there’s an instance of violence, but you can use collective punishment to hold them all accountable for that. If you do then no protest is allowed. I haven’t seen anyone defend anyone using violence. You’re bringing that up as a strawman.

                • Cethin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  It isn’t, but I’ll take the bait anyway. Where were these students not peaceful? I haven’t seen it yet.

                  Just FYI, MLK Jr, the person most known for “peaceful protest” today in the US, was said to have been starting riots by much of the mainstream media. It’s easy to say people are rioting to make people disagree with them, especially if you use violence against them and accuse them of being violent now.

              • NoIWontPickAName
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                You asked if it is just to be jailed for protesting genocide.

                I said yes, you didn’t ask is it right for these students to be jailed.

                People like to use questions that are extremely vague in conjunction with subjects that are related, but not as strongly as the questioned asked.

                That is bullshit wordgamery and I will call it out

                • @EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Such transparent dogshit on display here xD you insist that they define basic words like “jailed” and “peaceful” and “protest” , and accuse them of “wordgamery” bc you can’t understand the basic English words they’re saying. Just letting you know nobody is falling for this, you’re just making yourself look stupid by acting like others’ words are utterly incomprehensible when it’s obviously not :3

                • Cethin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  47 months ago

                  You asked if it is just to be jailed for protesting genocide.

                  I said yes, you didn’t ask is it right for these students to be jailed.

                  How is it ever just to be jailed for protesting genocide. Maybe it is while sometimes, if you do something illegal in conjunction with it. The act itself isn’t illegal though, so getting arrested for it is unjust.

          • NoIWontPickAName
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            “At what point does a legal protest become an illegal one?” would I guess be a better way to say it

    • @stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      No, and that you thought it might have been is the scariest thing to me. This is why people should exercise their rights, otherwise the population doesn’t even know what rights are there and which aren’t. And not knowing those rights, can’t see them being encroached.

  • @lycanrising@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    27 months ago

    i’m not really sure how this is unfair. protesting can mean running up against laws and breaking them. the question is whether the cause you’re protesting for means enough to you to accept that.

    • @Eximius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      157 months ago

      Because it is unrelated to their studies/work at the university and they shouldnt be attacked for it by their institution/employer for their political views.

      • @lycanrising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        just being a student doesn’t give you permission to use college campuses as you want. if you break rules or laws, there’s consequences for that. if you believe that what you stand for is the most important thing, then you accept the consequences as a feature of what you’re campaigning for. If you don’t, then your heart isn’t really in it and you just want to do whatever you want and get away with it because you feel like that’s what you deserve.

      • @lycanrising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        protesting has rules and boundaries. you are allowed to organise and protest within those, and going outside of that is usually a civil office (like trespass) or a criminal one depending on what goes on. These students are likely committing trespass.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      I’ll go with colleges are failing their basic mission of providing a safe place to help kids develop into adults. Whether you agree with them or not, the university should be in the business of creating that safe place, helping develop the future, not escalating, not poisoning the future of the kids entrusted to them.

      • @lycanrising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        i hear you, but there’s a difference between letting kids develop into adults and supporting students who trespass. You don’t just get to break laws because you’re a student and your school should support you to develop.