• JayTreeman
    link
    fedilink
    1366 months ago

    I’m struggling with everything on this article. On the one hand anytime a hostage has been freed, that’s good news. On the other, at what cost. 40 000 dead. That’s the easy stat. Amputations are also incredibly high. Most of them kids and performed without anesthetic. This is the first time the IDF has rescued hostages. So I’m sitting here with my initial feeling of ‘oh, that’s good news’ ,and then I think about the wider picture and context, and it doesn’t seem so good anymore.

    • smnwcj
      link
      fedilink
      606 months ago

      And half a dozen months ago they could have had a ceasefire to have them released, along with the ones that STILL aren’t released.

      • @kbotc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        346 months ago

        Nah, that was the one that Egypt fucked up. There had not been an actual agreed upon hostage transfer since the first one. Hamas also won’t give actual information on the hostages. This whole thing is just war crimes the whole way down.

      • @AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 months ago

        “we don’t negotiate with terrorists” and that stance is “non-negotiable.” If only these terrorists would just stop and do what we want.

        • @deltapi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          276 months ago

          So you think we should negotiate with terrorists? Give them something to make them stop what they’re doing today, and they definitely won’t commit more terrorism later in the hope of getting more things later.

          Maybe just stick to eating ass, Adam.

          • @SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            296 months ago

            Spain did successfully negotiate with ETA, and there is no more ETA today. Colombia’s government negotiated with the FARC, and the immense majority of the FARC have gotten peacefully integrated in their country’s parliamentary system.

            • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              96 months ago

              If I looked into those organizations, I would bet they were probably at the point of talking reasonable concessions, and probably resembled a proper government, albeit radical or militant.

              Hamas is not at that point.

              • @_cnt0@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                196 months ago

                Hamas is not at that point.

                So, how many bombs still need to be dropped on Palestine to get them there?

                • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  96 months ago

                  That would require Hamas to care about Palestinians. Their leadership is a bunch of wealthy shitheads living it up in the UAE. They hold a dictatorship over Palestine and refuse to have elections.

                  To actually get Hamas there, you probably need to target the rich people giving orders.

              • @KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                So you don’t know anything about those terrorist organisations, don’t want to read up on them, and instead just assume.

          • @hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            146 months ago

            Maybe you’re right, the world tries to negotiate with israel all the time to no avail.

    • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      216 months ago

      Three months ago the IDF also rescued 3 hostages by killing many civilians. They bomb entire neighbourhoods to rubble as a distraction mechanism for their teams to go in.

      • @zbyte64
        link
        English
        11
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        They bomb entire neighbourhoods to rubble as a distraction mechanism for their teams to go in.

        Those human shields had it coming. /S or I guess they’re human bait now?

    • @Monomate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      206 months ago

      Maybe the Palestinians themselves devalue their own lives compared to Israeli lives. Just look at when they agreed to a ceasefire and traded hostages for prisoners: each hostage was worth multiple prisoners released by Israel.

      This is also noticeable when Hamas use their own population as human shields, exemplified by when they hide their soldiers and weapons in hospitals and schools. Or when they blend in with civilians on purpose by not using any combatant uniform like the IDF do. They really don’t care for their own civilians. These are only useful for acting as human shields and, if they’re killed or injured, strike a pose for NatGeo-style photos in their attempts to appeal to western sentiment.

      • @zbyte64
        link
        English
        246 months ago

        Maybe the Palestinians themselves devalue their own lives compared to Israeli lives.

        You should just stop right there. If your logic depends on saying “they actually don’t value their lives as much as others” then please stop and ask “what the hell is wrong with yourself?”. People who think like this probably value their life least of all. /s

        • @Monomate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          When I see how easily the Hamas uses their own population as sacrifices, I have doubts they really value their lives. Remember: the Gazan population elected the Hamas with more than 60% of the votes. It’s not too farfetched to say a significant part of the Gazans think like the Hamas in terms of sacrifice, and by extension, how they value their lives.

          • @DeLacue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            176 months ago

            50% of the population of Gaza was under 18 based on Israeli numbers for Gaza prior to October. This means 50% of the population wasn’t even alive when that vote happened since it happened 18 years ago! Fun fact about that vote; Hamas represented themselves as significantly more moderate in the run-up to the election only to drop that the moment they got elected and murder all their political opposition. They have since continued to murder outspoken political dissidents and quash any efforts for new elections.

            A twenty-year-old election that was run on lies tells us nothing about the feelings of the people of Gaza in the current day. It doesn’t tell us how much they support Hamas now and it certainly tells us nothing about how much they value their lives.

            Though your twisted rationlisation tells me a lot about how you value their lives.

          • @zbyte64
            link
            English
            10
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Just know that this accusation you make is a confession of your views and you should investigate what that says about yourself on your own.

            • @Monomate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You don’t believe me? Those who are immersed in islamist ideology think quite differently from people of christian heritage (even if they’re not christian themselves, but they inherit a set of values). For the islamists, self-sacrifice if a good thing if done for a holy cause. That’s what motivated the plane terrorists from 9/11: their religion made them believe that what they were doing was just. And as a reward, they’d have the company of multiple virgins in paradise.

              In the western countries, due to the inherited christain values, people value life and reject self-sacrifice. Suicide is considered a sin, because the person is throwing away the body given by God, which is a holy thing. That’s why the USA and other west-aligned countries pressure Israel to preserve the life of innocent Gazans: that’s what best aligns with their moral values. If a bank is being robbed with the use of hostages, the police will do its best to preserve the life of the innocent, even negotiate with the robbers if necessary.

              That’s a way of thinking that’s the polar opposite of the muslims. For them, if the cause is holy, self-sacrifice is allowed and encouraged. They’re indoctrinated in these values since they’re children. What the Hamas is doing is exploiting the western values for their benefit. That’s why they took hostages, because they knew it would be a huge leverage against Israel. And that’s why they’re always flaunting the number of casualities (which are obviously inflated, because it helps their goals), in an attempt to reach the western countries’ moral values and turn it into pressure for Isreal accept an indefinite ceasefire agreement, even a bad one.

              Consider this: if the roles were reversed: Gaza had immense millitary strenght and Israel was the poor country, the Gazans would invade Isreal in a heartbeat and would care much less about Isrealli innocent civilians: for them the cause is holy, so it is justified to kill indiscriminately.

              • @zbyte64
                link
                English
                15
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                You don’t believe me?

                What is it that I disbelieve exactly? You’re here trying to convince others that a group of people don’t value their lives as much as you do. I believe you when you say that you don’t value groups of human lives equally, I just don’t share that view.

                Those who are immersed in islamist ideology think quite differently from people of christian heritage

                I’ll be honest, I didn’t bother reading the rest of the wall of text after this. Enjoy your crusade and may you die as you have lived.

          • @DeLacue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            No, no it doesn’t. Suicide is a sin but Christianity absolutely glorifies self-sacrifice for the religion. I mean you’ve heard of martyrs right? It became a core tenant of the religion in the early roman days that dying for the faith gets you straight into heaven. Glorifying dying for the faith is a massive part of Christianity too. In Islam committing suicide is a sin unless you’re self-sacrificing yourself for the faith and dying for the faith also gets you straight into heaven. Just like in Christianity. They’re both Abrahamic faiths and have a lot of the same roots.

            So yeah what the fuck are you talking about? They are no more self-sacrificing than anyone else. They’re just fucking people. They’re all just people. Why can’t we just treat them like people?

      • JayTreeman
        link
        fedilink
        196 months ago

        I could be wrong, but I haven’t seen any independent verification that Hamas has been using hospitals and schools for bases, but I’m positive that there’s been debunked Israeli reports that schools and hospitals have been used as Hama’s bases.

        Same thing for human shields. IDF admits to using Palestinians as shields. To my knowledge, there’s no Hamas equivalent.

        This ‘war’ isn’t about Hamas anyways. If it was, there wouldn’t be 1000 people killed in the west bank. Hamas isn’t in the west bank. Why is the IDF letting people kill Palestinians in the west bank?

        • @Monomate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          126 months ago

          Likewise, there’s no independent verification when the Hamas minister of healthcare periodically announces the number of casualties, but the media tends to take it at face value as it was the crystalline truth. When this is most likely an inflated number to keep Israel in the worst light possible, and to exert political pressure for the USA to stop supporting Israel with weapons of war. It’s all with the intent of the Hamas getting away with it.

          The Hamas has a history of lying and deception in order to support the narrative in their favor.

          There’s the incident of Hamas accusing Israel of bombing an hospital last year, which the media widely reported as truth before checking, but in the end it was in a building a block away from the hospital. Since this embarrassment the media has been more careful before confirming anything coming from Hamas official sources.

          Also the Hamas had a guy that multitasked as an News Reporter, Combatant, Healthcare Professional, Bloodied Victim. This was reported in social media, a guy from Hamas appearing in photos doing all those things in different occasions. Give this guy an Oscar already!

          The Hamas does not hesitate to manipulate facts to confirm their intended narrative. Their track record is tarnished at this point. But, to be honest, an organization that takes hostages as a leverage to negotiate a ceasefire in a war they themselves started, from this point it was already very clear they’d do anything to achieve their goals. From using civilians as human shields to lying without shame, these things are just the cherry on top of the heinous acts they committed as the catalyst of the war. They were not trustworthy from the start.

          And what you say about “IDF using Palestinians as shields” makes no sense. That’s what the Hamas do, actually. The Hamas see their civilians as disposable sacrifice for a religious end. If an IDF soldier took a Palestinians civilian literally as a human shield in order to avoid being shot by a Hamas militant, the militant would shoot both of them without hesitation, because they see their civilians as sacrifices in a religious sense. Just an addendum, the Islamic State leaders used to say “we love death like you love life” as a point of comparison of the radical islamic worldview compared to the western worldview. That’s the kind of thinking that drives the Hamas, and that’s why they’re not ashamed to call for the extermination of all Jews as if it’s the most normal thing in the world.

          About the deaths in the West Bank, I’m not too knowledgeable about this to comment further.

          • @zbyte64
            link
            English
            106 months ago

            The media isn’t taking the numbers at face value, unless you’re also making the claim of the UN and UNICEF because they use the same numbers. The fact is, given the wide destruction, the actual numbers are much worse. If you can’t admit that last point then I assume you’re not familiar with what percentage of homes have been destroyed or how many dead journalists and their families have been murdered.

            • @Monomate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              I can’t see how the UN and UNICEF can get to an accurate number for the number of casualities, as most bodies are in a zone of war. And just because a building was blown up doesn’t mean there were civilians inside. Most civilians are in tents in refugee camps. I’m not trying to say there’s no casualities in a war, but that it’s impossible to count all bodies right now because of the warfighting, and there’s probably bodies under rubble as well. Only when the war is over it’ll be possible to get an exact number.

              • @zbyte64
                link
                English
                86 months ago

                Not sure if you realized, but you moved from “Hamas’s numbers can’t be trusted” to “we can’t trust any numbers because it’s war”.

                • @Monomate@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Both statements can coexist without any contradiction. If no numbers can be trusted (due to loggistical concerns I cited in my previous comment), how can Hammas be so sure of the numbers it gives to the press? Not only would Hammas’ numbers be innacurate if they were acting in good faith, but they’d be outright fake in case of bad faith on their part (most likely scenario).

            • @Monomate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              I’d take this with a grain of salt because it’s just the tale of one man. But if it’s true, it’s sad becuase it would represent the wheel of hatred turning.

    • @rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      Imagine how much resources hamas spent on keeping these hostages and how many lives could be saved if they just released them all before the ground operation was started.

      • @SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        216 months ago

        Netanyahu said since November that even if all hostages were released he was going to invade anyway and not stop the war.

        • @rdri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          86 months ago

          Even more reason to release them all then, and I’m appalled by how hamas was that stupid to not realize that.

          • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            136 months ago

            Ahh yes, give away all your leverage when your enemy already stated he will murder you all.

            You should become a negotiator.

            • @A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              76 months ago

              They don’t have any leverage, because the people calling the shots in Israel (and to be clear, that is the likes of Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, who want effectively no Arabs river to sea, and hence Netanyahu, who I think would do just about any atrocity no matter how abhorrent just to stay in power and out of jail) value the pretext to invade far more than they value the lives of the hostages.

              So the hostages do not actually give Hamas any leverage over Israel - hence why Israel is not willing to agree to anything. Hamas should not have taken civilians hostage or targeted civilians in the first place, and they should release them. That is still an ongoing war crime, even if it is overshadowed by bigger ones being perpetrated by the Israeli side.

              Hamas never had a chance of winning on military might.

              The best chance for a good outcome for the Palestinian people is through raising awareness of the plight of the Palestinians, resulting in international pressure. The pressure against Israel arising now is because of the severity of Israel’s war crimes, while Hamas’ war crimes are one of the key talking points used to justify not taking action. Hamas could help Palestine win the information space war by taking the high road; winning a military war is futile for them.

              While it is not fair to punish Palestinian civilians for the war crimes of Hamas just because the interests of Palestinian civilians are aligned to Hamas’ goals, there are many people who don’t see it that way. Palestinian statehood (or a non-apartheid one-state solution) would now get far more international support if the Palestinian militants shifted to peaceful resistance.

            • @rdri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              What leverage? You’re saying hostages are needed to save hamas members? Well that seems to be working pretty well huh? Remind me again why they were taken in the first place?

              You should become a negotiator.

              What negotiations? It was a perfect opportunity to show that your cause is a good one, and not to Israel. Instead they kept the hostages… For what purpose? To have “leverage”? Well let’s see how that will help them with anything. Maybe there will be more news about released hostages that you could again associate with Israel trying to release its civilians, not with hamas doing right things.

      • @kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        156 months ago

        Just think about how many lives could have been saved if Israel worked towards a two state solution

      • @Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yup, see the person below you saying almost exactly that in more clinical - but clearly sincere - terms.

        Edit: When I say they are “sincere” that is not to say there is any merit to what they are saying. I’m pointing out that they actually believe this garbage is justification for the mass slaughter of children.

    • @SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      246 months ago

      Hamas is already willing to agree to the US peace plan, so the only thing preventing the rest of the hostages making it to their homes is political will, and with much less risk.

    • @mal3oon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      186 months ago

      Are semitic people white? If so, so are the Arabs.

      Hamas kidnap kills then kidnap a bunch of israeli people hide them among civilians and within even their refugee camps IDF frees some of them Lots of civilian casualties Pro-Pal peeps, oh no, look what the IDF did

      I’m glad the hostages were saved, and can’t wait for hamas to lose.

      • @C0unterfactual@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        176 months ago

        This echo chamber doesn’t want to hear about the fact that Hamas is a murderous terror group that intentionally endangers Palestinian civilians to further its religious and political cause.

        • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          286 months ago

          Because it is victim blaming bullshit to justify the genocide against Palestinians. Whatever Hamas is doesn’t justify the atrocities committed by Israel especially since Oct. 7 but also the Decades before. Did you know more than 500 Palestinians were murdered in the Westbank since Oct. 7? There is no Hamas there, but now that the Israeli fascists can get away with it, they enjoy their impunity as they murder, rape and pillage.

          • @bier@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            156 months ago

            You are right but that does work both ways.

            Whatever fucked things Hamas has done, is not a blank cheque for Israel to murder innocent people.

            While at the same time

            Whatever fucked things Israel has done, is not a blank cheque for Hamas to murder innocent people.

          • @C0unterfactual@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            66 months ago

            There was a ceasefire on Oct. 6. Then Hamas and other Palestinian fighters started the present conflict in Gaza on Oct.7. I won’t recount how because Lemmy doesn’t like to hear when what they perceive to be a victim group commits unthinkable atrocities. But then they took these hostages back into Gaza, and hid them in tunnels under civilian infrastructure. This is fact. Hamas started the present war, but everyone only blames Israel. I believe this qualifies as what you call victim blaming bullshit.

            • @hglman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              76 months ago

              The war started in 1947, and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people, any hand waving about some other starting point, is intentional revisionism by the Zionists to cover the scope and scale of their crimes. Which has now grown to a scale rivaling any genocidal you wish to name.

              • @C0unterfactual@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                36 months ago

                Regional tension has been going on for far longer than that, but Hamas is the elected government currently in Gaza. They began the current fighting. End of story.

            • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              There was a ceasefire on October 6? Then how come more than 200 Palestinians have been murdered by the Israeli occupation in 2023 before October 6?

    • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      146 months ago

      Obviously it’s good to minimize collateral damage and casualties wherever possible. But I see no issue with this result.

      If a country values the lives of their citizens they will rescue them and spill any blood needed. Conversely, a nation that values its cut will try to minimize the harm that could come to them and keep hostages far from where they are.

      • @kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        186 months ago

        If a terrorist holds hostages in amongst hundreds of INNOCENT PEOPLE it’s fine to massacre them all. When you could have just got all your hostages released by accepting peace. Cool moral compass you have there

        • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          I agree, Hamas is a criminal terrorist organization that does not value the lives of Palestinians. I mean a criminal terrorist organization hiding hostages amongst civilians in a heavily populated area they are worse than the example you gave because they intentionally put those civilians at risk of harm.

      • LoudWaterHombre
        link
        fedilink
        English
        126 months ago

        What if Hamas is spilling blood because they value their citizens and land?

        • @Guydht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          86 months ago

          because they value their citizens

          Hiding hostages in a highly populated residential area, without any means of self defense or even evacuation safe zones, is not called valuing the citizens. It’s called using them as leverage, something terrorists love doing to civilians.

          What did the spilling of blood on oct.7 did to Palestinians? Make them live in hell for over 8 months? Make thousands die? And for what, for massacring Israelis? What do you think Hamas has done in oct.7 that would make you think they “value their citizens” - coz to me it only looks like they just wanna kill jews.

          • LoudWaterHombre
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            What makes you think they don’t think that? In the end palastine was occupied by Israelis. It said a good government spills blood for its citizen, how can you be so god damn stubborn to not see that this point holds just as valid for palastine and Hamas. Of course you can cherry pick one thing that is not protecting citizen but I believe you can do the same thing with Israel. Like the US is constantly fucking up its own people, I’m sure you can cherry pick an event in Israel too. How much thought went into the citizens as they came up with the idea to plant Israel in the middle of a Jewish hate triangle where they are threatened and attacked on a so regular basis, they need stuff like the fucking Iron Dome in their cities?

        • Spzi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          What do you mean? Of course they do. It’s not a contradiction, because they are adversaries.

    • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      It’s only 200 people. How many people am I worth? 200 kidnappers? 199kidnapers and I kid? 198 kidnappers, 2 kids, 3 moms, 5 elders and cousin Vinny? Couldn’t they just get the victims out and catch the kidnappers instead?

  • Kokesh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Great news. Not sure if genocide of the Gaza population is necessary for that.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      326 months ago

      It is not.

      This article doesn’t mention if anyone was killed in the raid, Hamas or civilians.

      • @Monomate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I know right? I’ve always thought calling it genocide a flagrant exxageration. When I think of genocide, it comes to mind images of some evil dictator using poison gas in a population, chemical weapons, an atomic bomb, etc.

        To be a true genocide, it must be an indiscriminate elimination of the population of a nation or an ethnicity. It’s not the case of Isreal, which is targeting specifically the militants of Hamas. Just because there are civilian colateral damage in the process does not make it a genocide automatically, because the civilians are not what the IDF is after. They’re after Hamas militants. Gaza has a very high population density, and the Hamas militants don’t use any uniform to differentiate them from the civilians. They do it on purpose to make the IDF hesitant, and get them by surprise. They hide themselves in buildings that they know the IDF would be hesitant to attack, like hospitals, schools and mosques. They play dirty, and then cry genocide when the IDF respond to their missiles sent to Israel’s territory.

        • @JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          136 months ago

          When I think of genocide, it comes to mind images of some evil dictator using poison gas in a population, chemical weapons, an atomic bomb, etc.

          That’s just lack of education on your part, though. Neither the Cambodian Genocide nor the Rwandan Genocide would be a genocide according to you, but in reality these were two of the worst genocides in the last 50 years.

          Come to think of it, neither would the Bosnian Genocide according to you, because it mainly targeted males for execution.

          then cry genocide

          The people who are “crying genocide” are those of us in the international community who know what a geenocide is, including experts in international law.

          • @Monomate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            If Israel really wanted the destruction of all Gazans, they’d not send their soldiers to a prolonged war. They’d rather send their own missiles and everything would be destroyed in seconds. They have that capability, but they didn’t use it. If it’s really a genocide as you suggest, it’s the dumbest one of all time, because they’re risking their soldiers when they can attack safely and decisively from a distance.

            • @nexguy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              It’s possible that they are not flagrantly killing civilians in that manner but are just looking the other way more than they might normally do because they are Palestinians and care less about collateral damage due to race.

          • @Monomate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            Dictionary definition: “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.”

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    666 months ago

    they could have had all the hostages if they didn’t reject the ceasefire proposal…

    • @bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      216 months ago

      Do you have any credible sources where Hamas made that promise? Because from what have read they never wanted to agree to releasing them

    • @Threeme2189@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      There is a majority of Mizrahi jews (ie: not white) in Israel as compared to “white” jews, mostly from European countries.
      So your comment is fucking stupid.

      • @kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        Not really. You’re responding to something I didn’t claim. But enjoy tilting at that strawman

    • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      376 months ago

      It is good.

      I wonder how many other innocent people being murdered justifies saving other innocent people.

      Can you kill 100 to rescue 4. What about 1000 or 10000.

      The fact is they could have accepted any number of ceasefire deals to release these hostages, but they chose to keep murdering more people and further creating the next generation of Hamas signups.

      • @rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The fact is they could have accepted any number of ceasefire deals to release these hostages, but they chose to keep murdering more

        And the fact that hamas could have released them all before the operation was even started.

          • @rdri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            56 months ago

            I don’t think it matters how you call them. If you want to label a party bad by calling them terrorists - it’s your choice.

            I know that Israel is able to take care of their own people. Hamas is incapable of that and is willing to kill Palestinians in order to bring any damage to another party. It’s understandable that Israel started the ground operation (maybe not how it goes now, but still). It’s illogical to say that hamas did the right thing with the October 7 events, already because it was obviously useless for their cause.

            • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You’re just being disingenuous now.

              How is anybody to take care of the Palestinian people when they essentially live in an apartheid state. They have been oppressed by the Israeli government you’re defending for decades now.

              Go have a look at maps over the decades of how much land has been stolen. Regular bombing etc.

              You could read some Finkelstein on the subject, you know the Jewish expert who has researched it most of his life.

              Edit: Notice how I said both sides were terrorists and you only want to focus on one side. That’s called bias my friend.

              • @rdri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 months ago

                when they essentially live in an apartheid state.

                Didn’t prevent them from being able to take care of Palestinians instead of building missiles.

                Israeli government you’re defending for decades now.

                What

                Go have a look at maps over the decades of how much land has been stolen

                Yeah, and how exactly hamas changes that?

                Notice how I said both sides were terrorists and you only want to focus on one side.

                All I see is people focusing on calling Israel a monster.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          146 months ago

          Only in this particular operation. But the war had to get this far for them to conduct it. So the cost is exponentially higher.

            • @Monomate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              If you were one of the parents/relatives of the kidnapped israelis, would you still think it was not worth it?

              • @oyo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                86 months ago

                Tens of thousands of innocents dead? Uh… No. I would think there were far more effective methods that should have been used.

              • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                No, but I’m fully aware I’m a hypocrite there. I think most people are when it comes to their loved ones. If I was family of the hostages, I wouldn’t care how many innocent people died to get them back. I’d support the IDF.

                If I was the family of the nearby Palestinians, I wouldn’t care about the hostages, and I’d let them die if it meant my family would be safe. I’d support Hamas.

                This is why geopolitics can’t be personal. The best decision is not one that you insert yourself into, because you have a much higher threshold for acceptable collateral if it’s your own family on the line.

                At the same time though, this is also a lesson in why a ceasefire is crucial. You put yourself into everyone’s shoes, and you understand why this needs to end. Everyone’s families and loved ones are dying or in captivity, and it’s perpetuating a cycle of violence. It needs to end. Israel has the power to withdraw from Gaza and pursue purely diplomatic means, and it should.

                • @Monomate@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  In the end of the day, it’s the law of the strongest. It’s no accident that Israel hoard a lot of weapons of war and build defensive systems like the Iron Dome. It’s a show of power for a very simple goal: deterrence. I don’t think Israel really though of using all their weapons, but just having them makes every one the enemy nations that surround them to think twice before attacking them. Well, Hamas did not think twice. And they cannot say they didn’t saw it coming.

                  Israel accepting a ceasefire deal would be nice for saving lives and all, but would leave them vulnerable for future missile attacks from Hamas. A nation will always think of its own citizens first. Maybe the Hamas already counted with this reaction of Israel, and though that other Arab countries would form a coalition to fight Israel simultaneously. Well, it didn’t pan out. Deterrence worked after all.

  • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The Israeli military had US support in rescuing four captives from Gaza in a “complex daytime operation” in Nuseirat that killed over 200 Palestinians.

    The Palestinian government media office in Gaza said the death toll from Israel’s attack on central Gaza had reached at least 210, with 400 more wounded.

    The Palestinian health ministry confirmed that a large number of dead and wounded Palestinian had arrived at Al-Aqsa Martyrs hospital. It said that most of them were children and women.

    "I came from the camp to here in the hospital on foot. I can’t describe how we fled. I saw dead children and body parts strewn all over as we fled. No one was able to assist them. I saw an elderly man killed on a animal-drawn cart.

    “Nuseirat was being annihilated. It was hell.”

    210 people killed 4 rescued. Mission accomplished everyone. Don’t forget to thank Biden for his direct military involvement in this operation.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 months ago

      50 civilians killed indiscriminately per 1 hostage freed. And that’s not counting everyone that’s already been killed in this war.

      I think anyone with a shred of morality is heavily conflicted by this. Saving hostages? Great. Killing 50x as many people as those saved? Not great. Not great at all.

      It naturally leads itself to the question we’re all thinking – was it worth it?

      And I think many of us have the same answer, although we may not like it – no. It pains me to say it, but it would’ve been better to let them stay hostage for longer while developing a plan which wouldn’t kill civilians.

      • @Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        Unfortunately, the alternate option was not “let them stay hostage a while longer”. It was “let the hostages die”. And maybe that would have been the more ethical call. But let’s not delude ourselves that they could have been kept alive any other way.

    • @nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Many people are saying if it had been Trump he would have gotten the hostages out in 24 hours. It would have been a perfect operation. The best you’ve seen.

    • @CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      This honestly wouldn’t surprise me, Delta is quite skilled at this and we almost never hear about their ops. US wants hostages to end the war faster but not admit being there, so easy to just let IDF take credit, despite them shooting hostages instead of rescuing them.

    • @HighElfMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      Ah, yes. The famously incompetent IDF. Unlike those US SOF who have definitely never screwed up in any way.

      Do you have any real evidence that US forces are operating in Israel besides your hatred of Israel?

    • @Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      Wait, isn’t “US boots on the ground in Gaza” one of the things people warned would happen if trump is elected? Interesting 🤔

  • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yo mods why you remove my comment?

    Edit: Essentially asking the same questions as JayTreeman.

    Edit 2: It appears my comment was reinstated after I provided a source to counter the misinformation report. I would expect better of the mods to do some due diligence before just censoring comments. There is enough of this in the MSM and it does nothing to further allow people to see what is happening. Thank whichever mod undid the action, hoping it was little_cow but not sure.