• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kroger insists that “any test of electronic shelf tags is to lower prices more for customers where it matters most. To suggest otherwise is not true.” For some reason, nobody trusts them.

    Then I’m sure they’ll be completely transparent about the criteria used for making the price changes and how the algorithm works, right? Because they’re trustworthy, right?

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can absolutely depend on a publicly traded corporation that’s legally obligated to make decisions in the monetary interest of its shareholders—to behave in an altruistic fashion for the benefit of mankind.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it’s okay they’re using an AI model, so inevitably they can point to the huge jumble of math and say “computer did it” when asked to defend the gouging. That’s basically transparency, right?

    • vrek@programming.devBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it is true, they just admitted to security fraud for not maximizing profits. I doubt it is true but would be interesting to see it in court if they decide to admit to lying in a public press release or security fraud not acting in the interest of shareholders…

      • froztbyte
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        they just admitted to security fraud for not maximizing profits

        what the fuck kind of comment is this

      • David GerardOPMA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        security fraud for not maximizing profits

        stop posting

        • selfA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          programming dot dev has got to be an experiment to come up with a comment so confidently incorrect it kills on contact

          • V0ldek
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re trying to kill the AGI by polluting the training data.

            Project Wheatley

          • froztbyte
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            they’re certainly pioneers in researching the limits of bad takes density

          • corbin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s very funny that, of my two Lemmy accounts, the sneer-club account has better domain reputation than the programming-specialist account.

          • David GerardOPMA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            having just reviewed his other comments i’ve enabled the Egress-O-Matic