some of the sub’s friends are holding a conference although they’re still not totally comfortable to go public:
but buyers are warned that purchases will “require approval”
aww, the poor babies. even with literal nazis in the whitehouse they still feel uncomfortable to spout their weird shit
hopefully if this thing happens at all, someone documents the everliving hell out of every attendee
a startup offering IQ screening for IVF embryos
Is this… the perfect grift?
it has to be. you can’t do better than this. who is going to be like “they told me my child would be gifted but the kid is actually mid at best”
“intelligent” people make the best marks, donchaknow
Only big dum-dums wouldn’t buy Dr. Swlabr’s Brilliant, Life-Extending Snake Oil! Use it in a poultice, as a liniment, or as an emollient! The smartest use it instead of the fertility-sapping seed oils!
Brb, splitting my sperm into the Wordcel half vs the Shape Rotator half.
Is this… the perfect grift?
Surely the free market would never allow this.
Details emerge about Natal conference in Austin later this month, set to feature figures linked to far-right politics
I’m also learning some details about the Vegan Conference in Seattle, set to feature people who don’t eat meat.
Well, I can see the distinction being important. I’m sure the adult baby/ageplay crowd don’t want their good reputation stained by these chuds
we now have a Reliable Source for Cremieux being Lasker, which we were previously only 99.999999% sure of
David Gerard: keikaku.jpg
Tracing Woodgrains: malding
plausible undeniability
Does this also Reliable Source him being tpo?
sadly not directly
So many of the prominent eugenics enjoyers name-dropped in the article have being regulars in ACX in common, as well as having been personally sanewashed by siskind on numerous occasions, that it’s becoming increasingly absurd how he keeps flying under the radar when modern racism and eugenics are being discussed in major outlets.
Like, I don’t see how Cremieux/Lasker/TP0 ever breaks into the mainstream enough to be notable by The Guardian without Siskind making rationalist spaces super friendly to people like him as well as deferring to him and endorsing his writing.
kinda wonder if the pushback about the nyt article contributes to this
