• suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    202
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe your wife’s choice of career has fuck all to do with how good of a person you are. Since she’s not property and you don’t control her, yeah?

    • HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      143
      ·
      5 months ago

      Who is downvoting this? Melania is a monster, but doing nude modeling has 0 to do with it. Attacking Trump through that is really gross. He has plenty of gross skeletons to go for, and Melania has actually objectionable actions, this meme is trash.

      • Karjalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        71
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, shaming her for nude photos is pretty fucking weak and, imo, just detracts from any point you’re trying to make

            • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              True. Pointing out a double standard has value, but they picked something imaginary instead of all the other criticisms that were directed at Obama and not Trump. Occupy Democrats has been consistently pretty crap tbh. Lots of twisted facts even if the spirit is in the right place.

          • Guidy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ll shame him for any god damned thing I please.

            You know who broadcast those news photos on national TV right after shitler won the last election? Putin.

            Shitler hasn’t ever been big on dignity, but a few decades ago neither political party would have allowed a candidate whose spouse had such photos to run.

            Yeah it’s a truly minor issue especially with how egregious everything else is these days, but it’s still a real and legitimate issue regardless of your feelings on sex work or equity or fairness.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyzBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              5 months ago

              You know who broadcast those news photos on national TV right after shitler won the last election? Putin.

              The billionaire war criminal who profited off the destruction of the USSR is also a misogynist, what’s your point?

              a few decades ago neither political party would have allowed a candidate whose spouse had such photos to run.

              And you understand that was/is due to their misogyny right?

            • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah it’s a truly minor issue especially with how egregious everything else is these days, but it’s still a real and legitimate issue regardless of your feelings on sex work or equity or fairness.

              • tomenzgg@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                My husband finally watched Billy Madison this year and I’ve been thrilled because I can finally reference this scene to my heart’s content and he’ll know what I’m taking about.

            • tiny_iota@endlesstalk.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              “no! when they go low we have to go high!” So high that we sail right over alleged high ground that we covet and allow morons to run the country!

              if we are mean we are just as bad as those meanies that are ruining the country! logic-ally speaking of course! but seriously trumps wife is a literal prostitute.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nude modeling is morally neutral.

        Hell, participating in ethically made hardcore porn is morally neutral.

        Judging a woman for either is misogynistic. Judging that woman’s partner for her choices is even more misogynistic.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          Except if a wife sticks with her husband through his terrible choices., judging her is not misogynistic at all. Isn’t this the same crowd that loves to say if you’re sitting at a table with nazis, you’re no better than a nazi?

      • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        My take is that it’s a rejection of the “high road” stance. That we have to be the better ones and don’t stoop to their level. Nothing is off limits when Trump is attacking people. The high ground hasn’t done anything positive. Besides that, people body shame Trump. His hair, his weight, his penis size. Call her a gold digging slut. There hasn’t been rules for years.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes that’s how we beat the awful people who control the world!

          Nothing causes lasting and meaningful political change like going for the low hanging and bigoted fruits! Let’s all be misogynistic for equality!

          For the record, I don’t advocate that shitlib “high road” (AKA do nothing but argue procedure and deliver empty sound bites while fascists gradually stamp down every right and liberty owed to all people) either.

          Be vicious towards the fascists. But be specific about it. Tell them exactly why they’re loathsome and what sort of treatment they deserve.

          You don’t accomplish anything by slut shaming the awful wife of a misogynistic monster. It’s like mud wrestling with a pig.

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Funny that we can reject the high-road when it comes to misogynistic or body shaming in our messaging, but not, say, when it comes to needlessly restraining actual action with norms and procedures that Republicans can and do break at every convenience.

        • sobchak@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you successfully move people over with puritanical talking points, the party or whatever will get more puritanical. It also makes it easier for the other side to dismiss or counterattack if the other side is not puritanical. In this situation, it would be better to commend her “sex-positivity” or alternative lifestyle, relying on the other side’s dissapproval of such things, instead of framing it as “bad,” which kind of concedes that point.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah so we should all give in to the lowest common denominator and allow ourselves to be dragged backwards by idiots and fools who can’t make compelling arguments.

          Great advice /s

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you see this post and you come and comment defending Trump or harassing Obama then it’s a pretty safe bet you’re a piece of shit, downvote and move along.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not a judgement of Melania. It’s a judgment of the type of guy who would have a nude model mail order bride as their 3rd trophy wife.

    • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s more about the evangelical base and their extreme cope than necessarily about Melania, though being hypocritical to attack your out group is nothing new.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s low-hanging fruit of the simple minded who can’t make a compelling argument. Don’t make excuses for misogyny just because the rhetoric is being used in your favor.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s good that Obama isn’t on the Epstein list.

    But a woman’s value isn’t based on how many people have seen her body.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I say this as someone who doesn’t have Obamna Derangement Syndrome: this post is painful boomer slop.

  • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    Stop idealizing Obama. We don’t have the full list and he’s been no different in terms of foreign policy and bombing brown people.

    • Gaylactus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think this is idealizing him, and I certainly don’t, but compared to Trump he’s still miles ahead, when you make a “generic” assessment. And the post is still making (most likely) an accurate statement. Obama doesn’t strike me as being a womanizer or a pedophile.

    • tiny_iota@endlesstalk.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      wheres the tea party equivalent reaction from (racists) american politics from trumps election?

      oh wait that was the reaction. America couldn’t handle a brown person who was even half white running the country and lost their fucking minds. Now we get another loser celebrity con-man. Wonderful. That January insurrection was just a random flux though, right?!

  • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    We have no idea if Obama is on the list because we don’t have the list. We pretty much know that Trump is on it, and someone like Bill Clinton is also very likely on there, but Bush Jr, Obama, and Biden could all also be on that list but we just don’t know. It’s a list of very powerful people, and anybody who has held the office of the presidency is a suspect as far as I’m concerned.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    sure but that’s not the metric by which we measure goodness, considering. As in, memery aside, he should not be speaking as if he’s not a monster as well. 😂

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nope. He was pretty much a failure. He also sold out on day one, and collected millions in “speaking fees” from Wall Street firms within days of leaving office. If Obama had been a great president, Trump wouldn’t have been the next president.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You underestimate the effectiveness of two things

          1. Racism

          2. Russian Psyops

          But Hillary still won the popular vote.

          • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Don’t forget an anti-Clinton smear campaign going back over twenty years. She was, despite being objectively qualified, a terrible choice for a candidate. Republicans had decades of opposition research on her and zero compunction about making even more shit up for political theater (see the attacks over a personal email server even though it turned out their own opsec was 100x more lax, several hearings over Benghazi despite previous ones failed to find anything, or hell, even Bill’s impeachment that started as them going over the Clinton’s finances hoping to find a hint of corruption, then latching onto the affair even though Newt Gingrich, the one pushing these dirty tricks, was in the middle of an affair himself while his wife was dying from cancer).

            It was yet another time Democrats ignored political reality to push someone who was at the top of their internal party hierarchy, and Republicans were more than happy to take advantage of their naïveté.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            We elected Obama, then suddenly became to racist to vote for other people in his party, most of whom weren’t even black? That’s some serious cope. At least if you dragged out sexism it would have been potentially relevant.

            The idea is to win elections. I’ll care who wins the popular vote when that means winning the presidency.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Fun fact, more than one thing can influence an election at a time. Perhaps you even noticed multiple things in my list?

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                No shit. That’s the churn of the playing field where politicians compete. If they can’t overcome that shit to defeat a fucking reality show clown, then they are in the wrong line of work.

                And anyways, this thread was about my response to you calling Obama a great president. The reasons I gave why he wasn’t had nothing to do with reelection. Maybe you’re pulling from a different thread because you have no answer to what I said?

                But sure, let’s look at what happened to the Democratic project during and after his presidency. Obama was elected with a big majority in the House and a supermajority in the Senate. (With the caviot that Democratic cronyism resulted in the Democrats being plagued by health issues and deaths in office). Obama lost the House, lost the Senate, and lost over a thousand state level Democratic seats in his 8 years. Did the churn cause all of that?

                I know Obama has cute dimples and an easy but confident demeanor, and half the Democratic voters have a para social relationship with him that rivals what MAGA has (had?) with Trump. But that’s not what makes a great president. History will remember him as mediocre at best, and I hope it doesn’t forget his role in manipulating the 2020 primary and ultimately giving us Trump twice.

  • tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unlike Dump I actually would want to see Bama’s wife naked.

    Not really a strong conviction here, but she seems like she’s not all plastic yet. A mind up there, too… Always good in my list

    Also, she at least looks like someone who’s actually had an orgasm in the past 40 years or so.

  • crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Funded by the globalist bankers, bailed them out when the housing market fiasco happened, and gave a middle finger to the middle class/homeowners. Obama’s bailouts also allowed the banks to take that money and give their CEO’s, who caused the situation, huge bonuses.

    He then went on and drone-bombed a fuck-ton of individuals including a lot of innocent children and women, and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, laughing at the irony. Obama was no friend to the working class, a globalist-first president. Worse than Trump? Just two snakes with the same body.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not that you’re not right about the rest, but maybe don’t use “the globalists” with so little specificity?

      When you’re using THAT term vaguely, people can’t tell if you’re (rightly) blaming Obama’s kowtowing to multinational corporations and their toadies for a lot of the awful things he did and caused or employing Alex Jones’ favorite antisemitic dog whistle to blame a shadowy Jewish cabal…

      Kinda an important distinction.

      • crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Globalist = a crony-capitalistic group of oligarchs who are trying to control commerce, the people, and the world. This is not aimed at Jewish people, but it does include Zionist. Hope that is clear.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fair enough. I’m not sure I agree with how orchestrated you think their actions are but yep, billionaires and other crony capitalists do in fact control the world and many of them are indeed Zionists without all of Jewdom having anything to do with it.

          Thanks for clarifying 🙂

  • misterdoctor@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Smashing the Like button on Occupy Democrats facebook posts is what boomers think meaningful political activism is

    • peregrin5@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      not voting and spending their lives rage memeing online is what tankies think is meaningful political activism

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Voting is not political activism. Its actually the least important form of political participation. Yet, America still can’t get 40% of its populace to engage with even that. Try forming a union, creating propaganda, hosting educational seminars on politics and political history, or feeding and housing those who can’t afford to do so themselves (Through a group/org not as an individual obviously). These things are political activism. We complain a lot on the internet because it is very frsutrating to live in a world where the vast majority of people think the most important thing they can do is vote for one loser who hates you or the other loser who doesn’t give a shit about you.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thank you for speaking some fucking truth even is most people will just downvoted this cause it makes them realize how little they actually do.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Friendly reminder, that Obama assassinated an American citizen in drone strike.

    Anwar Nasser Abdulla al-Awlaki (Arabic: أنور العولقي, romanized: Anwar al-'Awlaqī; April 21, 1971 – September 30, 2011) was an **American-Yemeni **Islamic cleric and lecturer assassinated in Yemen in 2011 by a U.S. drone strike ordered by President Barack Obama. Al-Awlaki was the first U.S. citizen to be targeted and assassinated by a U.S. government drone strike.[6][7] U.S. government officials alleged that al-Awlaki, a dual citizen of the U.S. and Yemen, was a key organizer for the Islamist militant group al-Qaeda.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe he did, maybe he didn’t, however if everyone is saying illegal immigrants deserve due process that same standard as to be applied to terrorists. If that same standard isn’t to everyone; people don’t have rights, they have privileges.

        • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The difference between them justifies different treatment. One is a Group of immigrants that is within your jurisdiction and even your custody and only wants to work. The other is a Terrorist that wants to kill people and is at roughly the opposite point on the globe, far away from your jurisdiction and custody. They don’t need to be treated the same.

          Also by not killing him they would have disregarded the right to live of his potential victims.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    And youve done what to stop trump?

    Edit: Downvote me all you want. How is it trump can mobilize a whole ass nazi movement and its too much to expect dem leadership to fucking do anything about it?

    Trump was a con man and reality TV star. Obama was fucking president eight years.

  • shalafi@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Trump would lose his fucking mind. Remember, Obama baggin’ on him is why he ran in the first place.

    If you haven’t seen it, history in the making, and funny as hell to boot. Except for the consequences.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I completely believe that’s the point in time it all started to go wrong, and if Obama had simply avoided being a smug knob, we would never have had a Trump presidency.

      The jokes weren’t even that good.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Get over it. Any late night show or comedian’s social media has much harsher (true) criticisms of Trump. Also, mildly poking fun was the point of the Correspondents’ Dinner, at least before Thin-Skinned Trump cancelled the tradition…