• stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 个月前

      Every election here in Sweden and EU I come to the same conclusion:

      There are no good political parties, the best you can do is to vote for the least bad party, and hope that it works out.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 个月前

        Pretty much all over the world people say that and then race to vote for the second worst party/person because “the better one could never win.”

        Vote for who you most align with, anything less than that is just betraying yourself and prolonging the inevitable slide to the right.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          10 个月前

          The issue you are describing seems to mostly stem from the idiotic and unfair system of first past the post, Sweden has proportional representation, so I do end up voting for the party I mostly align with, even if it is a completely new party.

          I have voted for several different parties in the three normal elections, even at the same election day.

          Then we have the act of protest voting, as well as support voting. These are tactics you can use in a proper voting system with a healthy amount of political alliances.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 个月前

            Yea I’m in Canada and it’s that problem. We should be 8-9 years deep into ranked choice or similar but our centrist party that ran on that promise fucked it up big time because they realized that they’d probably never win an election ever again. Their entire platform basically depends on the Conservatives being such absolute trash that no one feels safe voting for our leftist, progressive party.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 个月前

          Thank you. This incessant capitulation to the lowest common denominator is why across the world we are seeing a rise in regressive, right-wing ideology.

          People stopped fighting for better and have just consigned themselves to accepting literally the 2nd worst option out of fear that the worst option will succeed.

          It’s a shitty catch-22 that is fundamental aspect of electoralist politics and why I vehemently am against them as a political structure.

      • susurrus0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 个月前

        Except the ‘least bad’ party gets 0.8% votes and almost all the votes go to worst and second worst. What most people mean by ‘least bad’ is simply ‘less bad’, as in ‘less bad than the other one’. And even that ‘less bad’ classification can be troublesome to wrap your head around.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 个月前

          Coming from Sweden, with proportional representation I can tell you that we do get niche parties elected for seats in the Riksdag (Swedish parliament) or Kommunstyrelse (municipal government) from time to time.

          So it isn’t out of the question

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 个月前

      1000% agreed, but fuck if I wasn’t literally smitten listening to Lina Khan talk. Attacking corporate hegemony really gets my engine going.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 个月前

      I’m fond of Robert La Follette (one of the loudest voices against US entry into WWI), Russ Feingold (only senator to vote against the Patriot Act), and Bernie (who doesn’t need an introduction). In all of history, there are some politicians that stand above the rest.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 个月前

        Suppose I polled the American people’s agreement with the statement “In all of human history there is one politician who is my favorite above all others, and that politician is President Donald Trump.”

        We know that I would get tens of millions of people who genuinely and strongly agree with that. It would be depressingly close to, if not over, a hundred million.

        Or maybe over 100M before the Epstein revolt and below after, lol.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 个月前

        Yea. The politician whom they most support, otherwise said to be their “most preferred”.

        You know what is another way to say that something is an individual’s “most preferred”? It would be to say it is the individual’s “favorite”.

        Thus, people, in fact, do have favorites.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 个月前

        Brother I’ll be honest with you, I will read 18 pages of whatever bullshit you want to write to me, but I won’t even watch 10 seconds of video.

        • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 个月前

          Joke is that it’s an over the top song praising united nations politician Jen Egeland by the same artists that made “what does the fox say.”

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 个月前

    Having a favorite politician is weird, like having a favorite landlord. You should care about the policies and efficacy of your politician, and not really give a fuck beyond that, unless they are a rapist, serial drunk driver, or something like that.

  • _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 个月前

    I was supposed to have a favorite politician? I just assume that anyone who wanted a position of power is probably plotting something

    • susurrus0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 个月前

      This is precisely why it’s every government’s top priority to cripple the education system. Or if it’s already crippled - either cripple it further or just keep it as is, depending on the circumstances.

      Personally I live in the EU, so it’s not nearly as bad for me as it is for Americans. However, even in Europe most politicians and their parties get elected simply because people don’t know better and follow whatever their preferred TV station says.

      A lot of Europeans also have difficulties separating personal feelings from politics. You criticize one politician and suddenly everyone is mad, because that means you must be a devoted supporter of their opponent. Sometimes it feels like everyone is brainwashed, because they can only do ‘white’ or ‘black’, as if there were no other shades in between.

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 个月前

    If you’re an American and you can’t name… let’s say… 10 presidents, then it’s probably a bad sign if you even have a favorite politician.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 个月前

      If your sides are left and right they don’t both love billionaires.

      Take an ideological side, not a political party side.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 个月前

      Notice how neither side has gotten shit done that help the people?

      Speaking as someone who would literally be dead without government assistance, fuck off with that nonsense.

  • MonkRome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 个月前

    It’s worse than that, there are Republicans that know he’s morally reprehensible, might destroy the country, know he is incompetent, and still worship him.

  • Kennystillalive@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 个月前

    Having a favourite politician is alrrady almost cult like. Yeah, you can like and support some of their ideas but at the end of the day they are a politician.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 个月前

      Not really, no. Cults are a very specific means of control. Almost every organization ever has some minor aspect of the BITE model, but that does not make them cults. Doing so waters down the term and is insulting to people trying to get out or have gotten out.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 个月前

    Ahem…. Bernie.

    The 2025 Bernie people are definitely a cult, talk about beating a dead horse. It also shows the hypocrisy of all the “we want all the old white wealthy dudes out of politics!” And then demanding Bernie. Also Bernie is great at pointing out the bullshit but never has a plan to replace it. Having said that I love and agree with his views for the most part, but I don’t lip service, when I mean I want old white men out I mean all, not just the ones I dislike.

    Edit: kinda proving my point with the downvotes about the Bernie cult

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      10 个月前

      LOL

      “Bernie doesn’t have a plan”

      Bernie got 200,000+ Americans a living wage simply by getting off his ass and giving speeches at Disney and Amazon, bringing media coverage to their shitty labor practices. This was while Democrats sat on their hands and pretended that they’re powerless.

      It’s unreasonable to expect people not to be bitter when Democrats rigged primaries against him and served us up two Donald Trump presidencies.

      People aren’t Bernie cultists. It’s just a novelty when there’s a federal legislator who says things and then walks the walk.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 个月前

          My tone doesn’t prove your point.

          My tone demonstrates annoyance at your ill-informed opinion, which I’ve shown by presenting counterexamples.

          And a broader annoyance at ill-informed people being confidently incorrect.

          • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 个月前

            How can my opinion be ill informed or not? It’s an opinion, not a universal truth. The cult of Bernie is strong here. If he ends up on the Epstein list y’all are gonna trip over yourselves to defend him

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 个月前

              How can my opinion be ill informed or not?

              … by basing your opinion on weakly supported assertions or outright misinfo. I didn’t realize this was complex.

              • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 个月前

                It’s MY opinion though, YOUR opinion is wrong to ME. Get it yet?

                Anyways why am I arguing with a cultist? It’s like arguing with maga, with left views.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  10 个月前

                  Man, “The world is round” and “The world is flat” are both opinions, that doesn’t mean one can’t be ill-informed and the other well-informed.

        • optissima@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 个月前

          If you meant it youd do something about it. When are you running, I look forward to seeing your policies!

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 个月前

      I think Bernie inspired a movement that is quoted because he has many good ideas that can help people. Other “cults” don’t help anyone other than themselves and wreck shop.

      Finding a problem is part of being productive. Just because people find the problem doesn’t mean they can have a solid solution. But our government is built on adjusting. It has not been adjusted. The corporations have duped the American people into believing that their guidance is in their best interest in every way possible.

      The exit strategy is restructure or complete annihilation and then rebuild. History has proven this many times. See Egypt, Rome, France, England ect.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 个月前

      Also Bernie is great at pointing out the bullshit but never has a plan to replace it.

      Is this really the case, or is it that his plans don’t get a lot of analysis and detailed criticism because we all know the rest of the government will never pass it? And I don’t mean this as a Bernie-defending retort — I don’t follow him closely but I thought he’s proposed plenty of legislation and laid out changes in his speeches. His history in defending people that are not white dudes is pretty legit too, of course.

      And given that he’s old, rich, and has his heart in the right place, I bet he would instantly jump at the chance to be exiled from washington along with all the other elderly people.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 个月前

      Bernie is one of the few politicians with a plan.

      The fan club can be annoying in peddling conspiracies, but if there’s one thing that I’ve learned over the past decade, it’s that no political alignment absolves people from fucking stupidity.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.orgBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 个月前

      That’s US politics as a whole. Ever since the first Trump presidency a blue MAGA has been forming in the democrat camp. They’ve taken over pretty much all representation online by now. Bernie is also a victim of this by a similar left-lib MAGA forming around him.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyzBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 个月前

        Except Bernie gets a ton of criticism from his left for his unwillingness to act on gaza.

        The joke among Bernie supporters has always been “Bernie is the compromise”.

        • RedPandaRaider@feddit.orgBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 个月前

          I wouldn’t say those are Bernie supporters. They’re left of Bernie as you’ve noted.

          Yet many left-libs are willing to throw theory out of the window just to have a chance to slightly nudge the democrats to the left. His supporters are willing to leave class consciousness and struggle behind for some crumps of concessions. Those left of Bernie who are not his supporters, don’t.