• stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      B1 is a bit slow, but quite fun, B2 is brilliant, BTPS is similar to B2, but the crafting stuff is annoying, B3 was too chaotic with a too cluttred UI and a damn annoying story, B4, I have no idea

      • simple@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Allegedly B4 is much better than 3, aside from the abysmal performance. I can wait until they fix it and get it for $15 on sale.

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m waiting for it to become “free”, no idea how long that’ll take though.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Have you tried Wonderlands? I really liked it, and would love a sequel/more of that one.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          I liked that one but weirdly there’s no NG+ and the DLC kind of sucked. I finished it with a friend and we were like, “that’s it?”. It’s not very long, and it ends shortly after your end of skill tree powers become available.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          The TIny Tina game?

          I tried it, didn’t like it and uninstalled it.

          I am not saying it is a bad game, just that at the time it wasn’t game I liked.

      • debil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve been playing B4 for a few hours now and it’s been pretty good. Definitely getting more B2 vibes than B3.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Good assessment. I agree completely!

        I’m not very far in, but so far I’m enjoying B4 more than TPS, and MUCH more than 3.

  • normanwall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    3 months ago

    How does someone with such a shitty personality and dress sense get so smug?

    If I looked and acted like him I would want to punch myself in the face

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      How does someone with such a shitty personality and dress sense get so smug?

      Lots and lots of money.

      If I looked and acted like him I would want to punch myself in the face

      He has top of the line security details to do that for him.

  • nagaram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    3 months ago

    Considering Randy REALLY wants you to pay $130 USD for this game, I’m not shocked his performance advice was “be less poor”

  • trslim@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hot take, Borderlands was never really a good franchise. Yeah I played through the second game, but i did so once, and never wanted to return to it afterwards.

    • proper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      there was something special about playing through 1 for the first time knowing nothing about what to expect. Then when 2 came out I liked it alright but already felt like it was a big tonal departure. funny to see the discussion shift over time to 2 being the benchmark and 3(+) going too far.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well to me, borderlands 2 was the most fun I’ve had with a shooter since half-life 2 or CoD4. It’s one of the funniest games I’ve ever played as well. I think the writing in general is really top notch (props to Anthony Birch), the characters are memorable, the weapons and abilities are fun. All and all, BL2 really hit the mark in a lot of ways for me.

        Borderlands 3 on the other hand, just wasn’t as good. It had a ton of great quality of life improvements, so that was nice. The player abilities were also largely really good, I liked most of the classes. But it had a ton of weaknesses… The level design was pretty awful, the much bigger maps really spread out the action absolutely killed the pacing. The story was pretty dumb, and while the villains were detestable, it was only in the way that all obnoxious teenagers are detestable. And the greatest sin, the loot was a mess. They actually threw way too many guns at you, so many that you never really get a chance to enjoy any of them. And way too many of them were uniques (with mysterious effects they never bother to explain).

      • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly that was how I felt as well. I remember being hyped the play bl2 and then getting bored doing meaningless quests over and over. Like am I supposed to feel anything for these people asking me to retrieve parts over and over? At least do some sort of quest where they can shoot people. I thought the combat system was better but I wasn’t compelled to play through it

      • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        That one is a gem, Gearbox can’t compete with this. B2’s only biggest asset is the voice actor, the animation when two character interact is worst than Oblivion.

  • xep@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 months ago

    A game that looks like BL4 shouldn’t run like Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing turned on.

  • kuribo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dude really felt the need to insult his customers. He could have said it’s a premium game for premium machines, but instead he decided he wanted to insult people who can’t play it and suggest they are less than the premium people who can.

    2K needs to get this nut away from the mic.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not the current one, no. The Steam Deck is closer to a PS4 spec, and even if there weren’t optimization problems, this is built to a PS5 spec.

        • fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          For better or worse it’s unreal engine 5 (AKA volumetrics: the engine), so it’s got some easy performance gains here and there with engine.ini tweaks and maybe some mods to remove stuff if denuvo isn’t too bad about it.

  • Jesslyn Valeria@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s sad that a lot of devs just make their game and then slap frame-gen on it and then release it. Like who cares about optimization. Not that I blame them, people still buy those games full-priced, so…

    • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Who even has time to play full price games? I have enough unplayed games piled up in my steam/epic/gog libraries to keep me busy for decades.

      • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well a surprisingly lot of people. Just a guess but maybe this is the main or only hobby for a significant amount of buyers?

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Even so, the steam hardware survey seems to indicate that the vast majority of users wouldn’t reach specs to enable developer-approved framegen anyway. (Unless you count Lossless Scaling).

          We’re kind of going full circle back to the paradigm of “You are judged on your entry level as much (or more) than your high end [gameplay performance]”.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      people still buy those games full-priced, so…

      Wait, does nobody pirate games any more? I don’t think I bought a single game until I turned 25.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 months ago

    In other words:

    “We don’t want to put resources towards optimising our product. We don’t care if the methods we built our product with make it more difficult to use, while regressing in several key visual aspects. The burdon of our shortcomings will be placed on the end user, who will have to spend their resources to out-power them.”

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sucker game made for sucker gamers.

    Are you inclined to blame yourself for the obvious failings of a gaming corporation? Smash that buy button now!