https://titotal.substack.com/p/diamondoid-bacteria-nanobots-deadly

I wrote this article a month or two ago, thought people here might be interested. Drexler-style nanotech research appears to be effectively dead at the moment.

Oh, and Yudkowsky responded to the article with characteristic obliviousness:

I broadly endorse this reply and have mostly shifted to trying to talk about “covalently bonded” bacteria, since using the term “diamondoid” (tightly covalently bonded CHON) causes people to panic about the lack of currently known mechanosynthesis pathways for tetrahedral carbon lattices.

  • @blakestaceyMA
    link
    English
    157 months ago

    “covalently bonded” bacteria

    what an amazing theoretical possibility

    • @gerikson
      cake
      link
      English
      117 months ago

      “My previous bullshit term didn’t take off, time to try to launch a new one”.

      • @blakestaceyMA
        link
        English
        137 months ago

        “Covalently bonded bacteria” sounds like something the writers of Star Trek: Voyager would have come up with because they heard that “covalent bond” was a science term but did not know what bacteria are actually made of.

  • @swlabr
    link
    English
    137 months ago

    For my research, the primary speedups from AI come from using chatGPT to speed up coding a bit and helping to write bureaucratic applications.

    Lmfao

  • @swlabr
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    FWIW the “reply” that Yud “broadly endorse[s]” is the top comment:

    https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/g72tGduJMDhqR86Ns/diamondoid-bacteria-nanobots-deadly-threat-or-dead-end-a?commentId=T5FNEgeCCXFjGMsbN

    I read his comment in the original post and thought he was endorsing your article, which, for a moment, made me think Yud had a little more magnanimity than I’ve seen before.

    RE: covalently bonded bacteria. Here’s evidence of how Yud is joking: he understands bacteria as well as I do, which is not at all. However, I know that bacteria can be spooky, so if I were Yud trying to make a joke about bacteria, I’d google for developments in bacteria research and pick some phrase that stood out.

    • @Amoeba_Girl
      link
      English
      117 months ago

      It is a tragedy how these people only know to understand the world through “who’s stronger superman or goku???”

        • @Amoeba_Girl
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I believe the standard answer is that Superman would initially defeat Goku, but that would only make Goku stronger.

          edit: Sorry I mean, there is a 96% chance that Superman would initially defeat Goku. However, this would increase Goku’s power by several orders of magnitude, increasing his chances of winning. Each subsequent fight that Goku loses would increase his power recursively, which can be modelled as f(x) = a * 10^(dx). In the limit, Goku wins.

          • @sc_griffith
            link
            English
            117 months ago

            Prior belief: Superman has a 96% chance of defeating Goku.

            Evidence examined: According to TVTropes [1], when Goku is defeated he becomes stronger.

            Update to belief: It is reasonable to infer that Goku will become infinitely strong. Further, if the conflict takes place one or more years from the present, Goku is likely to have access to an artificial intelligence which either itself defeats Superman or which advises him in effectively defeating Superman. I therefore now assess that Goku has a 95% chance of winning.

          • @swlabr
            link
            English
            87 months ago

            Pfft. Real heads know that the only way to figure this out is with a prediction market

    • @swlabr
      link
      English
      117 months ago

      Bonus: I love the person in the comments who is effectively shouting, “A MILLION SUPERINTELLIGENCES! NANOTECH POSSIBLE! DEBATE ME! I’M VERY SMART!!!” into the void at this point.

      • @selfMA
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Light LEAKS through the CRACKS. My mind is BRIGHTER than it EVER was. THE HIGHER I RISE THE MORE I SEE.

        then again look at the way these people actually talk:

        Yeah we definitely disagree about that crux. You’ll see. Happy to talk about it more sometime if you like.

        the Cultist Simulator quote is significantly more sane than “nah I disagree, a million AI superintelligences can just poof their way into existence regardless of magical nanotech, infrastructure, the speed of light, or any other physical limitations on the amount of compute we can practically fit into one space”

        e: fucking “you’ll see”, these people are convinced the rapture is almost here

        • @swlabr
          link
          English
          87 months ago

          There should be a cultist simulator mod where the principles are the TREACLES components. Expeditions are deep dives where you fend off scientific consensus to find contrarian blog posts as relics. Followers can take damage from information hazards and must be healed by adderall or nootropics.

          • @selfMA
            link
            English
            67 months ago

            …fuck, I like this so much I might look up what it takes to mod cultist simulator later today

            • @swlabr
              link
              English
              77 months ago

              One of the languages you can learn is “incorrect japanese”

  • @Soyweiser
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There is a reason bricklayers don’t coat their gloves in superglue when working with bricks.

    lol

    E: also thanks for posting btw. Having read it now.

  • @saucerwizard
    link
    English
    67 months ago

    Drexler dropped diamondoid for iron pyrite like, a decade ago afaik.

    • @titotalOP
      link
      English
      27 months ago

      Do you have any links to this, out of curiosity? I looked a bunch and couldn’t find any successor projects.

      • @saucerwizard
        link
        English
        37 months ago

        Drexler’s blog - which might be gone now, which I was reading over a decade ago. I wish I could be more specific sorry. Yud hasn’t read anything since Nanosystems it seems like.

  • @gerikson
    cake
    link
    English
    67 months ago

    Thanks for posting this, it’s a very interesting read.

  • @swlabr
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    deleted by creator