• Eldritch@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    7 months ago

    As we know it? It already has several times. How many of you out there are browsing the web using Gofer? The centralized oligarchcentric web that we know today needs to die and great new things are coming along to take its place. Returned to more sustainable collaborative websites and services. Like the fediverse.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The only solace I take in the enshittification of the web and the resulting rise in prices, is that we might see (be forced into) a return to the small web and an escape from the stranglehold that big tech and social media has had on us for the last 15 years.

      If we’re lucky, the late-stage capitalism effect of ruining companies long term futures for short term gains might happen to entire industries instead of companies.

      • gary@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 months ago

        I see a lot of potential for it to push people back to the small web too. Lots of people becoming interested in personal blogs lately, decentralized social media, the whole indie web movement, etc.

        • mesa@piefed.socialBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just started mine! In plain html/txt. Just for fun. Eventually get rss up and running.

          • gary@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hell yeah! I’ve been blogging for a couple years but I just use Micro.blog. I’d like to switch to something completely self hosted one of these days though.

            • mesa@piefed.socialBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 months ago

              nice! I took a look at all the options…

              and decided that its all too much. wordpress get hacked daily. writefreely wouldn’t install. And some of the other centralized services kinda suck. So im back to old: nginx with a director filled with txt files haha.

              Ill publish as time goes on and by interest. Ill take a look at micro.blog too. But im thinking I might create a neocities at some point just for the fun of it.

              • gary@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Neocities isn’t a bad option tbh. I haven’t used it in a minute but if you’re thinking about neocities I really really liked bearblog.dev too!

            • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              I just spun up my own Ghost blog, being self-hosted and interacts with the Fediverse. Plus it’s pretty without me needing to know how.

              • gary@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’ve been really curious about Ghost lately! I set it up in a container on pikapods not too long ago but I ended up staying on Micro.blog. Something I really liked that I had no idea about beforehand was that they have their own little Discover feed over there right? It felt too serious for me when I mostly run an old school link/microblog kinda blog and it seems SO optimized for mailing lists and subscribers

                • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah, there is a lot of focus on getting your site out, but I just ignore all that part. I just wanted a nice place to self-host my travels without having to think much about it and it seems to fit that bill. But yeah, there is a place to discover other feeds and to comment on other people’s posts from the Fediverse and what not.

        • architect@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          You got links? Ive been working on something that fits right into this, too. It’s time, y’all.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Definitely. The conditions that created this version of the web have been gone for some time now. We’ve gone from connections that were temporarily and required hours to download a few minutes of postage stamp sized video. To always on connections capable of streaming multiple HD streams faster than real time in both directions.

        For my part I’m also looking in to purchasing and trying to set up a small Adhoc mesh Halow network and running a few services on it for myself and any others in the neighborhood that are interested. A small, free (after the hardware) anarchist wireless network. 16mbps can do a lot with simple services, etc.Plus, if a number of people in the area decided to adopt and contribute more nodes to the mesh, you could go faster still.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mother_of_All_Demos

      The 90-minute live demonstration featured the introduction of a complete computer hardware and software system called the oN-Line System or, more commonly, NLS, which demonstrated for the first time many of the fundamental elements of modern personal computing, including windows, hypertext, graphics, efficient navigation and command input, video conferencing, the computer mouse, word processing, dynamic file linking, revision control, and a collaborative real-time editor.

      In 1968

    • tal@olio.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      How many of you out there are browsing the web using Gofer?

      Gopher predated the Web.

      I do agree that there have been pretty major changes in the way websites worked, though. I’m not hand-coding pages using a very light, Markdown-like syntax with <em></em>, <a href=""></a>, and <h1></h1> anymore, for example.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        That depends on how you define the web. If you only call the web the web when it was named the web and not what it was before it was named the web. Then yes you’re correct that was before the web. The question is, is that a semantic or significant difference? ARPANET was still a web of interconnected systems. For an old goober like myself.who was using FidoNet net back in the mid 80s. And the actual internet in the late 80s, early 90s. I definitely remember Gophering on the Internet. Plenty of places still maintained gopher directories till the mid 90s.

        • tal@olio.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That depends on how you define the web

          Wikipedia:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gopher_(protocol)

          The Gopher protocol (/ˈɡoʊfər/ ⓘ) is a communication protocol designed for distributing, searching, and retrieving documents in Internet Protocol networks. The design of the Gopher protocol and user interface is menu-driven, and presented an alternative to the World Wide Web in its early stages, but ultimately fell into disfavor, yielding to Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP). The Gopher ecosystem is often regarded as the effective predecessor of the World Wide Web.[1]

          gopher.floodgap.com is one of the last running Gopher servers, was the one that I usually used as a starting point when firing up a gopher client. It has a Web gateway up:

          https://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/

          Gopher is a well-known information access protocol that predates the World Wide Web, developed at the University of Minnesota during the early 1990s. What is Gopher? (Gopher-hosted, via the Public Proxy)

          This proxy is for Gopher resources only – using it to access websites won’t work and is logged!

          • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            This has been mangled up by history. The important parts of the World Wide Web are having hypertext (basically links inside the document to other documents) and being networked (those links can take you to a completely different server). Apple’s Hypercard had hypertext, but it wasn’t networked. Usenet was networked, but had no hypertext.

            This is laid out in Tim Berners-Lee’s original 1989 proposal for the web while he was at CERN:

            https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html

            Gopher has all the qualities he was talking about. Gopher was a different kind of World Wide Web. We decided against that particular route, and for mostly good reasons, IMO.

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Gopher was not the original protocol of the web but an alternative to HTTP/hypertext. It didn’t get the same traction, however, and has practically been dead for decades.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I sympathize, but Gopher is designed against hypertext (inline links in text). It is impossible to have e.g. Wikipedia transmitted over Gopher.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I would argue that’s not quite correct. You can absolutely transfer HTML files over gopher, but you’re not going to be viewing it in the gopher program.It was very much designed to be what most people would be more familiar with in concept as an FTP server today, almost. Pretty much all you could view in app were plain text files. and no links between. Everything else was a directory of files to be downloaded.

        Gemini is definitely a bit of an inbetween. It does allow for linking between documents, but otherwise keeps everything simple and small, much like Gopher did.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I much prefer browsing the web instead of 2-clicking within each FTP path. (If you built a client to 2-click that for you then that’s just the HTTP web with extra steps.)

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Meh.

          I converted my blog from WordPress to a static site generator using Gemini’s version of Markdown as the base format, and then hosted both HTTP and Gemini versions.

          I later took down the Gemini version. The web site remains as static HTML driven by (a variation of) Markdown. No cookies, no JS, limited CSS. Even took out some old YouTube <iframe> tags and converted them to straight links to videos. Doing it this way does everything anyone would want out of Gemini without having to use a specialized client.

          We should be promoting some kind of browser extension that flags a site as having no cookies and no JS.

      • tal@olio.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I questioned Reddit doing so, and now we’ve got it on the Threadiverse. There are privacy issues unless your home instance is proxying images for you.

  • B-TR3E@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    …and YouTube is one of the major reasons. The web’s not a fucking TV and if you’re using it as a TV you’ll get stupid even faster than from watching actual TV.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wouldn’t that depend on what you’re watching?

      You can watch reality TV on YouTube, or traditional television.

      You can watch educational content and documentaries on YouTube, or traditional television.

      Hell you can watch some traditional TV shows on YouTube or traditional television.

      YouTube is just a platform for hosting content. Now they may have a “better” algorithm compared to traditional television, but that doesn’t really change much.

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, have a look what content is getting the most views. I had no idea someone could be that stupid.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, have a look what TV show is getting the highest ratings. I had no idea someone could be that stupid.

          I’ve heard this argument for like 30 years. Everything old is new again.

  • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Aside: what’s the gist of this channel? I’m not really familiar with it but the last few things I’ve seen of it appear to be two brothers communicating to each other via vlogs?

    • Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      The Green brothers are interesting and thoughtful. They try to be an overall positive influence on the internet, even aside from their vlogbrothers thing.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Pretty much, vlogs as if it were two people communicating back and forth via message. Hank is a really smart dude and also works on the SciShow channel, and his videos are generally pretty good/insightful IMO.