• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    9 months ago

    “We opened a position in response to feedback from the person whose former role you’re interviewing for.”

    “You increased staffing?”

    “No. We created an opening in response to their feedback.”

  • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Employees were complaining about low morale. So we threw them a mandatory after work pizza party for team building! It was a real hit, almost everyone showed up!”

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think we put in speed bumps a few years ago due to an employee complaint about speeding. I hate whoever suggested that. Not because people weren’t speeding/ riding tails, but now half the people drive 10 MPH going over 20 MPH speed bumps.

    In reality we’ve had a lot of good things due to suggestions over the years.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      Speed bumps now are designed to make SUVs do 20. I don’t have an SUV, I can’t do 20 over them!

      • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s actually the big trucks and jeeps that take them the slowest, or the stupidly lowered cars. I take them fine in a crossover and have coworkers that do fine in priuses and other sedans.

      • Doom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Meanwhile in my jeep, “what speedbumps?”

        It’s almost as if speedbumps are stupid. If they really wanted to address speeding traffic calming designs would have done it better and been prettier to look at.

  • BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    This would a funny question at my work.

    You want a change? Scope it and present at the sprint planning. If it makes sense it gets built.

    Happens multiple times every 2-3 weeks.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But that’s a code change, that’s like saying “we changed the products from being in the back to being on the shelves”.

      Do you also change your process? Do you divide the work differently? Did you hire a new person to take care of those tasks that are never prioritized and then suddenly become emergency fixes?

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Depends on the scope! To stick with your analogy, there’s currently a product you need to drive around to the back of the store, load in your truck, and assemble at home.

        There will be a new area in the store dedicated to that product 95% assembled, with people who need to be knowledgeable on 5% that customers need to do.

        Kinda clumsy I know, maybe I’m missing the point of the post.

        • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I gathered that your earlier comment’s wording implied your primary work was in computer programming, so the responder assumed the kinds of changes you were talking about were normal changes to the product/code, as opposed to operational changes within the company. What you described sounds like it does appropriately qualify for the “operational” category.

  • FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cue the LinkedIn lunatic ranting that employment candidates asking critical questions of hiring organizations are a cancer on all industries.

      • Eczpurt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Situation, Task, Action, Result.

        A basic guideline for answering questions with some degree of completeness.

        • loonsun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Specifically its for answering behavioural interview questions which go “tell be about a time you did X and what happened as a result?”

    • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would ask if they would rather an employee who is skilled and will do fair work for fair pay or if they want someone who will say anything to get paid.

      If you don’t need the money right now, you can dodge bullets.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes they want someone who will just follow instructions. A 50% productive employee for 10 years is better than a 100% productive employee for 2 in the eyes of capitalism