• Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yes, it’s for “easy searching.” I dunno about current offerings, but even Roku boxes from five-ish years ago had them; you’d hold a button and talk into the remote.

      • trebach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 days ago

        They still have them. This was from a Roku stick but has been repurposed for Flirc. The devices it was once connected to had a productive meeting with a pipe wrench.

        The mic is right below the power button and you held down the mic button above the play/pause button to use the voice search.

        A Roku remote

        • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          15 days ago

          It’s for searching (so you don’t have to type words on a virtual key pad with a remote with no alpha-numeric key pad).

          It would actually be OK, if they all had a hardware switch that cut power to the mic, but I doubt that how they work.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            15 days ago

            Having the mic on the remote always on and streaming back to the host would drain the battery in about a day.

            • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              I don’t know how they work but I would assume that the mic is not always streaming, as you say it can’t be due to battery.

              I do not feel comfortable to assume that there is ZERO possibility that the mic can be made to stream without the physical button pressed …

              … unless I did the work to understand how it’s wired and controlled, something I don’t care to do. So I’ll just assume they are unsafe spy devices until proven otherwise.

        • shynoise@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 days ago

          How often are you switching channels these days??

          It’s to search instead of using the on-screen keyboard via remote.

        • ElJefe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 days ago

          Streaming services have a search feature, but you have to scroll through each letter of the alphabet to spell out whatever you’re looking for. The microphone does away with both this process, and privacy.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.ioBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            15 days ago

            It would be okay if it was local, and a simple voice recognition could work. Smart phones have that ability when the connection isn’t present. But they’re going to make it cloud driven because that’s easier and opens up more “features”.

  • Xyre@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    Putting tape over it or glue in the hole is probably far easier to manage for the average person, without destroying the remote in the process. 😅

  • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Does your cellphone have a hardware cutoff on it?

    Edit: I can see that privacy larpers, like fantasy larpers, hate when you break their immersion.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 days ago

        While a great feature, that’s not a hardware cutoff, that’s a software cutoff. But, still, my software cutoff is turned off for both camera and for microphone. Great feature.

      • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 days ago

        Graphene OS is great. I’m glad to hear that you have it. However, that is not a hardware cutoff, and graphene OS does not rewrite the firmware on chips that are deeply embedded into the physical hardware networks of the mic and GPS. Only a physical cutoff to these two systems can hope to stop illicit telemetry and recording.

        I’m not trying to poopoo everyone robbing Google and MS and Apple and LG and Roku and every corp of their revenue streams. Fuck the corps!

        The vibe of posts like these though is usually one of removing tracking and spying, not revenue streams. So I think it’s important to remind everyone how deep they will have to go to genuinely limit their attack surface.

        • WoodYouLookAtThat@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Honestly these days, I don’t think it’s crazy to see data collection for advertising as spying. The same system that identifies your advertising demographic can also likely identify political enemies.

          And in this timeline? I don’t like those odds.

          I know my efforts can never be perfect, but I don’t think it’s crazy to pursue as much as one can

          • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Advertisement has been datamining ever since Google and Facebook figured out how to monetize their markets and is at this point, old enough to drink in the US. Absolutely not something recent.

  • Doom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Guys c’mon

    There are microphones in YOUR POCKET. They track your location and likely have access to all your communications literally in person and online. We’re going after remotes though? Okay. Sure. Whatever.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      Bizarre take. Most of us are perfectly capable of being aware of more than one issue at a time. One doesn’t cancel out the other.

      • Doom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        It isn’t different issues though. It is the same issue. But removing the microphone from your TV remote is literally nothing if you live in a world with cellphones or have a cellphone or even just use the internet. Your router can see your house these days.

        It’s goofy.

        • newline@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 days ago

          This defeatist mentality is exactly what those spying want you to think. Why bother trying to be more private at all right? Might as well give up entirely

          • Doom@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            It’s literally not defeatist. I’m saying there is an army coming and you are painting your nails to get ready for war.

            It might look cool, might even help you have confidence to fight better. But it’s worthless entirely especially if you live in a house or go to a workplace with people that have phones, own one yourself, have a wifi network or your neighbor has wifi.

    • Janx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      That’s whataboutism. The simple fact is, the vast majority of people don’t want or need microphone capabilities in their tv/remote (unlike a smartphone). But it’s there and can be exploited. Add in the fact that TVs are opaque privacy nightmares. Do most people know what they’re doing at any given moment? Not a chance.

      • Doom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It can’t be a whataboutism. It’s the same topic. I might’ve not made it clear but if you live in a house with wifi, your neighbor has wifi, your family or coworkers own phones, you go out in public really at all. This isn’t going to be the one that’s gonna move any needle, it is at best a feel good thing to do.

    • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Nobody here saw anything of Apple’s keynote a few days ago.

      Several times my privacy-WTF sense went tingling off the radar. Those devices are the absolute pinnacle of privacy invasion.

      • Doom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Phones? Yeah 100%. And everyone has one so even if you try to deal with your own, others do not and there goes all your effort out the window. Pair it with even the most basic video surveillance and it literally has everything about you. Your habits, your locations, your contacts, all communications, hell it probably can even tell how fast you run, what you eat and what your preferred shows are. It even has a nice little camera to look at your face each time you check your phone.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      Except they can still scan for and communicate with any nearby BT/WiFi connections, and some sets even have 4G/5G modems embedded now.

    • JelleWho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Vlan-ed it years ago, running on some old 2021 firmware. And it so snappy and clean. (I only use Wake On Lan for the TV, to sync up with the PC)

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    is this a “the best time to plant a tree” thing or is there something particularly terrible about today and tv microphones

  • P1nkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I remember Samsung did this on my TV with a talk function in the remote. This was a 2012-model. So it’s technically not new that companies do this, but what LG has done here worries me.

    I’ve got one myself now, but I live in bumfuck nowhere, and have blocked the MAC address for the TV. Got an HTPC connected it with Jellyfin and the whole shebang.

    • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Oh don’t worry. These tech companies pretty much all do this. If the TV’s aren’t listening and even watching us. It are our iOS and Android based smartphones and watches. Our in home smart cloud connected “security” camera’s. Our ‘smart’ doorbells, fridges, ovens. Our Windows/Macbook laptops. Our cars.

      We’re already long passed the dystopian threshold.

      The worst part is, the vast majority of people chose for this and socially shunned people that never opted in for this 1984 bullshit.

      LG is nothing, last year Apple settled for spying on their users. Nobody cared. Facebook has been charged for this, multiple times, nobody cares considering the popularity of Whatsapp and Instagram to this day. Everybody goes wild about the new iPhone, haha, it’s an absolute privacy nightmare that’s spying 24/7.

      LG is just a popular target now because they’re Asian.