• droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      as article points out: that one person is supported by a whole class of Americans - the billionaires. And those in turn are supported by not insignificant portion of American population. So plural is very apropos here.

        • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          businesspeople differ from billionaires in that they don’t get to impact policies and they don’t run multinationals milking both sides of the border

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Billionaires tend to be buisnesspeople, plenty of multinationals (most, actually) aren’t owned by a billionaire, and non-billionaires can run businesses that operate in multiple countries (again, probably most of them).

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          As is tradition.

          This isn’t even like an objective of the whole MAGA movement, though. Maybe they’ll manage to drum up more support over time, but right now, it’s the fuhrer’s vanity project. So, that doesn’t really count as “being serious about it”, for the rest of them.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yeah, there is that legal fiction, and typical way of looking at things, so it’s not an incorrect phrasing. It’s just kinda funny.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            400 million people is 400 million distinct people. Nobody could or does represent them; the idea that someone can represent “the will of the people” is propaganda. Same with every other government; they actually just have control.

            • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              A leader that is elected by their country, represents it. It’s a collective responsibility.

              In Trumps case, he truly represents it, in every way. Selfish, debaucherous, arrogant, can’t take criticism.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                A leader that is elected by their country, represents it.

                Well, that’s basically the propaganda. Says who? God? Physics? Neither. And, elect how? Some countries have proportional representation, which neither the US or Canada do.

                At the end of the day, a state is anything that has a monopoly on the use of force. Some allocate political power within themselves through elections (of many massively different kinds), while some do it other ways.

                You could say, “okay, elections have nothing to do with it, but we’re still responsible for what we let our governments do”, which covers the “it’s a collective responsibility” bit. And there’s a strong argument for that. But, by that measure pretty much everyone sucks everywhere, which you can take however you want.

                • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Says who

                  Well in that country, Republicans voters definitely because they turn out to vote religiously. We know they’re represented.

                  I guess this presidents apathy and selfishness represents those who don’t vote for whatever reason, so he represents them as well.

                  For those that did and are looking for excuses, this president gives a lot of those too, so I guess he represents them?

                  That’d cover it wouldn’t it?

                  You could say, elections have nothing to do with it

                  Well if I go by the evidence demonstrated repeatedly by the Republican vote, which is evidence demonstrated by Americans, I have to disagree.

                  pretty much everyone sucks everywhere

                  Well, no, but we are responsible for our governments. As an Aussie I’m ashamed of my weak government and I will act however I can next election, but I note that the voting strategy, which was to vote in progressive senators that block bad policy and pass good I and many others took has been reasonably effective here.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m in California, Canada - please annex us. We can draw up a map of the places you should leave behind. You know, the conservative ones.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The problem being we only have a slightly larger population, so it’d be pretty close to you annexing us. That’s not really the end of the world, TBH, but for many Canadians it would be a dealbreaker. Cutting off the rural bits would help, but not much since they’re rural (and, honestly, we could use some domestic produce growing, anyway).

      It’s just one of the biggest states in one of the most populous countries.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Convince Oregon and Washington to come too, I want to be able to drive to my new vacation spot.

    • ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hey, California – wake up!!! You do not need to be part of Canada to survive. Your economy is already fifth in the entire world, of all other countries, in GDP. Far ahead of Canada. You would 100% survive and prosper. Once you stop sending you’re hard-earned tax dollars to Washington, but instead fund everything Washington funds with your own tax dollars, you are still billions of dollars ahead. By any measure, California is a lot better off as an independent country than as a US state.

      You already have a credible National Guard air and land force that would for the basis of a defense force.

      The referendum in 2028 can make or break your future.

      SACRAMENTO, Calif., March 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ – CalExit.Now, the movement advocating for California sovereignty, today released a statement marking a historic shift in statewide public opinion. A recent California poll reports that, for the first time since polling on this question began, a majority of Californians now either strongly support, or do not oppose, pursuing California sovereignty. The combined figure stands at 51 percent.

      https://finance.yahoo.com/news/calexit-now-announces-majority-support-100000068.html

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Even if we came willingly, the Republicans wouldn’t really want another California.

      Trump doesn’t seem to get that’s what it would be, though. Except also add a raging insurgency, which would most likely spread.

      • sanzky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        in the hypothetical case of an annexation there is no way Canada would get statehood. they would be just another puerto rico

        • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          In that hypothetical scenario, I would undoubted become a partisan on their side and do as much damage as possible to our own military.

          Fuck em.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Depends on the hypothetical, I guess. We’re already handwaving a lot of things.

          Trump is rhetorically pretty specific about it being a new state.

  • ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It’s time for Canadians to start referring to California’s governor as the President of California, and refer to California itself as the country of California. Even Californians are now doing that.

    Congressman Eric Swalwell, a candidate for Governor of California, recently referred to California as “the greatest country in the world.” CalExit.Now concurs with the substance of that claim. CalExit.Now will continue to advance California sovereignty as the governing framework most capable of delivering outcomes that Californians consistently demand.

    Also

    SACRAMENTO, Calif., March 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ – CalExit.Now, the movement advocating for California sovereignty, today released a statement marking a historic shift in statewide public opinion. A recent California poll reports that, for the first time since polling on this question began, a majority of Californians now either strongly support, or do not oppose, pursuing California sovereignty. The combined figure stands at 51 percent.

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/calexit-now-announces-majority-support-100000068.html

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Who knew Trump took Canadian Bacon (the movie) so seriously.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    True. I am very serious about thinking my President is a fucking moron for wanting to annex Canada. And also for every single other aspect about him.

  • myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Please no, I already buy too much Canadian whisky. Add in proper poutine… chef’s kiss. Jokes aside, this would be dumb.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    They’ve been this way since the BNA act, it’s just how they are. (Technically longer but they wouldn’t mess with Britain)

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    8 days ago

    And i am very serious about killing any doodle who sets foot in this country with that intent.

    I don’t care if i die.

    I am not living undet the rule of people who worship curtis yarvin.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Same, TBH. I don’t have a whole lot to lose, and I’m pretty serious about democracy and human rights.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      8 days ago

      MAGA dipshits severely underestimate how many Canadians would actually enjoy taking a break from the rat race to repel invaders.

      • orioler25@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Are you joking? Most of you couldn’t even fucking handle staying inside and not going to parties when you wanted to. Stop acting like Canadians are hard.

          • codydodd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Yupp…

            Act 1 US war of independence founded modern Canada because a) the quebecois ever fearful of cultural erasure, ever relevant today given those US demands, b) those not in favour of a racist dictatorship (yes the anglosphere was turning their backs on a monster they helped create), my family moved to loyalist country, fitting, and c) Britain’s desire to legitimize presence by recognizing first nations,… founded canada. The US invaded thinking we would join but Quebec and the indigenous wanted nothing to do with that genocidal regime. An asymetrical response ended American interests.

            Act 2 The war of 1812, the US claims they kinda won because they genocided the Iroquois nation and paved a way for continental-scale genocide … but another goal was conquest of Canada. A goal they failed on every county…britain, its loyalists, and later founders of Canada fought back and said fuck you. Canada 100% repelled the US invasion using asymmetrical warfare.

            Act 3 Fuck around and find out.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I don’t think you can say that if you’ve never been invaded/occupied by a superior army.

          Maybe come over to vietnam and go to some museums or talk to some people if you want to know what asym warfare is like.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yes, Canadians have no idea what it’s like. We’ve seen even less ugliness than Americans, and when this whole thing started, we had to go to hockey for martial metaphors.

            Living in a warzone is a learning curve you can go up fast, though, because you have no choice.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              I know someone who served in the Canadian Armed Forces and did a tour diffusing IEDs in Afghanistan. I’m pretty sure he knows how to build one if it came to that.

              Americans don’t recognize that Canadians actually did go to Afghanistan. It’s not just Hockey metaphors, people in Canada actually do know the tactics the US military has a difficult time dealing with. That’s because our soldiers had to deal with those same tactics when fighting alongside Americans for two fucking decades. If the US decides to betray Canada they will soon be reminded that Canadians were in Afghanistan and what was learned there.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Yeah, refugees, combat vets, relief workers and refugees are not included. Even just being from a family with those backgrounds teaches you a bit about how the world really works, when push comes to shove, speaking from experience.

                The average Canadian on the street lacks the experience to understand, though. Even more than that, there’s been a kind of resistance to understanding it, historically, because it’s easier and cleaner not to.

                If OP thinks guerilla warfare is a vacation, they probably don’t know what they don’t know.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            It’s also worth noting that Canada has a land border with the USA. They can also pass as generic American, if required.

            Asymmetric warfare wouldn’t only be focused in Canada. E.g. a coordinated set of drone strikes could basically shatter large portions of the American power grid. There are too many soft, unmanned targets to viably protect, and the lead time of spares is measured in months to years, on some parts.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Do you not remember covid? Your treatlerites rioted in Montréal and tried to do a J6 over the most tepid restrictions. The ones jerking off over a romantic idea of fighting a war aren’t prepared to spend years living without the lifestyle they’re accustomed to and have themselves and their families randomly imprisoned or murdered by the evil empire they’ve served so faithfully. You’d be closer to the conditions of the IRA than Vietnam or Iran, except even they had a history of genocides to radicalize people.

              • cynar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                FYI, I’m not Canadian. Just an observer from the other side of the pond, watching America die in morbid horror.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I wouldn’t. Why conduct the destructive mess that is a war in our own living room?

      I’d contribute to any effort to make long range drones that strike energy and electronic infrastructure deep inside the US instead.

      Keep the destruction over there. Watch American arrogance melt away as they realize that fighting a war isn’t just some thing they send troops elsewhere to die over while they get to stay comfy and safe at home anymore.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        If you’re in a war, you’re going to get people dying on both sides of the border.

        And it’s going to be hard to procure that many drone parts under occupation, so if that’s your job, you might end up doing car/ATV bombs instead.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 days ago

        The answer is going to be both.

        Drones are the future of warfare. Ukraine has proven that.

        But if the US decides to invade, it absolutely WILL send troops over the border. And we’ll be there, shooting them down. Carney may have to undo Trudeau’s silly handgun restrictions for us RPAL holders for the good of Canada.

        I’m too old to be a soldier, but I can still hold a rifle. I’m not a violent person, but I will defend my country. I don’t believe that most people in the US support this, but I will shoot to kill any that come across the border with plans to invade.

        In my nearly 60 years on this planet, this is the first time I’ve said I will die defending my country.

        So yes, in a situation of war we support drones. We support attacks deep within US territory, rather than traditional face-to-face combat.

        But we will do whatever it takes to protect our country.

      • potter2010@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        If they’re in your living room, they’re in effective control of your area. At that point there will not be long-range drones going (maybe coming in), there will only be direct action by the local populace.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Plenty of Americans are hoping a dumb ass move like that is enough to weaken the morons in charge and join your side.

      Like both coasts and most of the bordering states would have majorities on Canada’s side.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Well you better call it a whoopsie doodle or I’m gonna cry. Do you really want making me cry on your conscience after that?

        • Jarbles@fedi.ohpossum.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          110%, and unfortunately nothing will get better until we Americans get up and do something about it. But THAT won’t happen until more of us are personally inconvenienced by this fuckery.

          Simply voting them out has a pretty low chance of working long term, made worse by the actions of the elite to sow uncertainty in our election system. On top of that, we’ve been shown that peacefully protesting makes little to no change at all in this situation. When peaceful protesting continually fails, it makes violence inevitable. I have no doubt in my mind that a major violent event will happen eventually here in the US. When will it happen? In November, when fraud runs rampant in the election? If the grift succeeds and Repubs win the midterm, I think all bets will be off at that point.

          Peacefulness has failed, it’s guillotine time.

  • remnant2652@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m American (unfortunately) and I want no part in annexing any country. I actually can’t recall anyone else here who does… Well except big orange wrinkly pimples in DC.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    The title seems to be generating confusion, but the author’s point is that there are billionaire oligarchs (not just Trump, people whose power is not term-limited) pushing to gain control of Canada’s resources. He’s not talking about ordinary Americans nor is he necessarily talking about an invasion or a war.

    The playbook here is generally to apply economic pressure with the aim of causing political discontent, while at the same time financing an opposition faction that’s more pliable, like they’re doing against Cuba, Afghanistan, Iran, etc.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m 51 and would murder every single American that entered here and tried to take away my country, freedom and my family.

    I’d die, but I’d hopefully murder a fuckload of yanks before that.