• Obituarykidney@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I did 6th, 7th and 8th grade in small town Oklahoma 20 years ago so I have first hand experience. Curious to know how bad it’s gotten since the advent of classroom iPads and ai, especially since they’ve maintained their bottom rankings.

          My 8th grade geography teacher was the wrestling coach. He had a projector with slides that matched the text book, and would just scroll through then reading off the screen so class. All of our assignments were in the textbook, which also has the answers printed in them. And that is what he used to grade the assignments. I got an award for “excellence in geography” at the end of the year, but I know for a fact it’s because I was in his class first in the mornings and I set up the projector for him because he didn’t know how. A bunch of my classes were similarly struggling.

          I feel bad for the teachers looking back, they were doing their best but had fuckall to work with.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            in MS, our coach was also the art teacher in the late 90s and early 2000s, im guessing ti hasnt changed. and in HS a football coach was the math teacher,. and then one of our math teacher in HS gave up on HW becaust students wouldnt do them.

  • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    These assholes wouldn’t know communism if it walked right up and seized their means of production. Taking care of your own people just means you’re doing a good job as a government.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      EXACTLY!

      All those things that the meme mentions are something that the government should be looking into regardless of what economy they institute!

      I’m paying $2,000 a month for a three bedroom that shouldn’t cost anywhere above $1100 a month!

      I went to home Depot last night bought some cockroach traps, Teflon tape a plunger and a short length of stainless steel tubing for $30. What’s up on tables 98 cents the plunger was $4 the box of cockroach traps was eight bucks and the length of tubing was $15! And none of the prices make any sense!

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It means you’re not in danger of those people doing what people do. They’ve forgotten what people do.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    I miss when reading from top-to-bottom was standard. Now, occasionally, we have to read middle-to-bottom-to-top-to-middle.

  • TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cap top-end wages by regulating a minimum wage that can be no less than 5% of the top pay in that company, (and calling out shell companies so we don’t get a situation where the CEOs’ are technically “managing consultants” to avoid this rule.)

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      During the 1950-60s (the best period for income inequality) CEO pay was ~30x the company average. If you want to key the limit to the company minimum as percentage of maximum, something between 1-2% would get you to a good place.

      edit: A possibly better option would be to tax executive compensation in a way that you don’t tax payroll. Though I don’t know enough to suggest the details with that.

      • TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I usually go with 3% when I pitch this idea, But since ole’ Elmo the South African Goose Stepping Space Ass was an actual Trillionaire for a hot second back there, I felt a modest revision may have been more impactful.

      • WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        edit: A possibly better option would be to tax executive compensation in a way that you don’t tax payroll. Though I don’t know enough to suggest the details with that.

        Uh, that’s easy. Progressive taxation, above whatever amount the % increases drastically.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s different. That’s based purely on the amount. And I’m not just talking about salary, but compensation, including stock options, expense accounts, and other benefit packages that executives get beyond salary.

          • WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, and all of these have a value that can be calculated. So tax them on the sum of their compensation + the value of the perks they receive.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yah. That’s what we’re talking about. That’s what I said. I’m not sure what you’re getting at here.

              • WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You said, when I talked about progressive tax:

                That’s different. That’s based purely on the amount. And I’m not just talking about salary, but compensation, including stock options, expense accounts, and other benefit packages that executives get beyond salary.

                I don’t understand what’s different then, if we both agree that the taxable base for an individual is their total compensation, not their base salary. I think we might have just talked past one another and essentially agree

                • Steve@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Sounds like it. I assumed you were simply talking about a progressive tax for wages and salaries that we already have.

  • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    These republicans are shooting themselves in the foot. When the most milquetoast reforms imaginable get called communism, it doesn’t make progressivism less popular, it just makes communism sound good.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Didn’t Donald Trump himself talk about caping credit card interest rates? He was lying obviously but I do remember him saying it.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    This tweet is extremely funny if you’re aware of the fact that Richard Nixon also instituted price controls.

    Nixon is, indeed, too far left to be accepted by the modern RNC.

  • cannedheat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is typical. Overload buzzwords like “communism” and “socialism” and people think they’re bad words without being able to describe why.

  • MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is obviously not communism… But also, just because it has large support doesn’t automatically make it not-communism

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    So? The messaging is easy to reverse.

    Republicans want to increase rent prices. Higher credit card interest. More expensive childcare costs. Higher prescription drug prices. Florida can’t afford Republicans’ economic policies.

    It’s literally the same game that conservatives pull whenever “the radical woke left” opposes tax caps (which don’t actually lower taxes) and it has a very high rate of success with unaffiliated voters.

    Realistically though, that kind of messaging “Far-Left Democrat” in this kind of environment, where Republicans have destroyed the state and federal economies for working class people, isn’t intended to make people vote Republican. It’s intended to make people not want to vote at all because “both sides are bad”.

  • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    wow… amazing innovative strategy that they’ve used incessantly for the last million years. let’s see if the dumb fucks fall for it yet again

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Communist price controls”?

    America is really throwing around communism like a scary buzz word, huh?