• Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    4 days ago

    Low on the IQ bell curve: “Modern British people couldn’t make Stonehenge.” (Conspiracy theory)

    Middle of the IQ bell curve: “Nooo! Stonehenge was made using advanced but historically plausible techniques.”

    High on the IQ bell curve: “Modern British people couldn’t make Stonehenge.” (They are just bad at everything)

  • JayDee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not only could it be built today, it was rebuilt by a retired contruction worker named Wally Wallington in the 2000s. Here’s his official site documenting it that’s linked on his youtube channel.

    Turns out, probably just took beams and small stones used respectively as levers and fulcrums to do it. Various aspects of his setup is likely not period-perfect, but I think he demonstrates pretty clearly that this isn’t a forgotten ability, it’s just been made obsolete by more modern methods.

    Here’s Wally’s final creation as far as I can tell.

    • filcuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Isn’t the big mystery that the stones originate from across the country?
      There’s no professor under this clown mask so please fact check

      • JayDee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        From this site ( I only inspected briefly so it might be a conspiracy site idk1):

        The massive outer stones came from about 15 miles north, the smaller inner stones traveled roughly 150 miles from Wales, and the central Altar Stone journeyed at least 750 kilometers from northeast Scotland

        Quite impressive, though I think we’ve compiled a wide variety of ways that could have been done, and have been recreated, for moving massive stones like Stonehenge’s. it seems less of ‘how’ and more of ‘which method’ that’s the mystery at this point. Here’s an article that articulates that sentiment, and a video of experimental historians replicating my favorite version of this.

        Edit:

        • 1 after giving it a more thorough look I feel safe saying this source is respectable.
        • bampop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          and a video of experimental historians replicating my favorite version of this

          Interesting how they keep it docile by blindfolding it. You don’t want one of those things to get spooked and run around stomping on people.

        • withabeard@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          You also have a (largely) farming population, who have work from the spring into the early Autumn. Then months on end of not much to do. Be drunk, eat into food reserves, stay warm and somehow stay strong enough to be useful farmers next spring. You have a bored population of young, drunk, possibly abusive, probably male.

          If you want some semblance of control over that population, you create religion, you tax the religion, you convince people that their gods want them to move that stone. The stone gets moved by those people. The taxes feed and intoxicates them, the work keeps them warm. At different times in history you send them to join the army, build a pyramid, go on a crusade.

          Dunno, I could be completely wrong. But it doesn’t feel entirely wrong to me that we have a common problem that’s been solved in a variety of ways in history and this could fit that pattern.

      • JayDee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That are is also very cool to see, though it looks like modern techniques were used for both quarrying the rock and erecting the structure. Still, there’s a strong draw to being able to see how the stones were potentially stacked pre-history.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    4 days ago

    Stonehenge could be built very quickly with today’s machines and technology. But just like cathedrals, the problem isn’t the means but the will: nobody wants to waste time and money on religious nonsense anymore.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      Building Stonehenge today would end up in an ill advised contract structure between public and private stakeholders which would be partially responsible for a cost overrun of ~175% and it would ultimately get cancelled after a decade and a half or so when only ~30% was finished.

    • WhiplashPost@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Whoa, whoa, whoa. I have to stop you right there buster. Stonehenge is not “religious nonsense” it is literally a way to keep track of celestial movement and track the solstices. This allowed for ancient peoples to track the change of seasons and properly plan their agricultural activities. It was entirely practical, and very good at its job as it still works today to an extent.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Power tools disturb the spirits living inside the stone which causes them to depart and find different rocks to live in.

      A structure like Stonehenge must therefore necessarily be made exclusively by hand tools.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s that easy!

          No joke though there’s a spiritual sanctuary in rural Pennsylvania where they’re making their own stone circle. Every year they have a festival where they use ropes to prop up a new giant stone, and then they bury it so that it stays put.

          It’s a really cool place, I think it’s called Four Quarters. You should check it out if you ever get the chance. They also host raves, medieval cosplay festivals, all sorts of cool stuff.

          And they built their own suspension bridge across a ravine! One of their members is an engineer by trade. The thing is legit!

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s extremely not true though. It’s what most people waste most time on of anything

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Someone built a modern one in SW washington state, although I think it’s just cast concrete. Certainly doesn’t look as nice in person

    • KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You are completly right. If you have the will and the money, you could call a quarry today and order yourself some big stones. They will fit on an oversized load-truck. Call somebody with one or two of those big cranes. Perhaps also consult an architect or engineer who can calculate the structural integrity. We can totally do that.

    • jdr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Stonehenge wasn’t religious, it was for a stone age equivalent of destruction derby

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The British isles are just a series of new people showing up and saying “mmm don’t mind if I do” Like, I can think of at least 9 separate groups that invaded, integrating and displacing the already extant groups to different degrees. The saxons were like, at least 5 invasions after stone henge. Hell, the earliest versions of King Arthur are about a dude fighting off the Saxon invasions.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    “traditional Saxon culture” is pretty funny too given it’s more like a bunch of German mercenaries turned up wearing Adidas and the Britons started wearing Adidas too because they thought it was cool.

  • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Some time ago, in Brittany, a store was built on a site where menhirs once stood. Nearly forty menhirs were destroyed, a true scandal.

    A fascist politician, Éric Zemmour, who fancies himself a historian (having written books on the history of France), seized the opportunity to decry the destruction of France’s Celtic history. The problem? The menhirs were erected two millennia before the Celts even arrived in Brittany… The guy read Asterix and Obelix and thought to himself, “What a great documentary!”. If this is the caliber of fascist intellectuals, I shudder to think what their henchmen must be like!

  • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Someone having generally the right spirit but being so deeply & utterly uninformed on the subject they are passionately fighting for that they undercut their entire position? On the internet??? On TUMBLR???

    No.

    I do not believe it.

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve always wondered about the complete adoration British people have for Saxons out of all the many different succesful invading peoples in their history.

    • skibidi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because the polity that survived to form medieval England, and from there the British Empire and modern United Kingdom, considered itself Saxon.

      Wessex, Alfred the Great. ‘The Last Kingdom’ - the only Christian kingdom in England that was not conquered by the invading Danes. Future rulers would emphasize their historical ties here as a means to gain legitimacy.