• @o7___o7
      link
      English
      134 months ago

      he also gave a shoutout to Molly White and David Gerard on today’s podcast!

  • @BigMuffin69
    link
    English
    144 months ago

    It’s joever semiconductor bros ;_;

  • Elise
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Honestly it has become less and less useful over the past 15 months. I imagine it’s due to the EU AI Act, but it could just as well be a failure in leadership.

    It repeats itself continuously, even when specifically asked not to. And it just doesn’t come up with interesting stuff any more. It always uses the numbered list format even when I specifically ask it not to. The custom ‘app’ gpts are a mess and have only wasted my time. I consider canceling my subscription regularly 😕

    I should add that I’ve had early access and built stuff on top of it and it was extremely exciting. Now I am just curious about future foss solutions to get back to experimenting for real 🌠😁

    For now I’ll likely just switch to another product, as it’s definitely useful to get an overview when learning. But to be frank a good book is just better 🤔

    • @gerikson
      link
      English
      264 months ago

      “It’s bad because of EU regulation” is the new “it’s bad because it’s woke”.

        • @gerikson
          link
          English
          124 months ago

          True, but it’s recently crossed the pond to Silicon Valley. I think it was when the DMA affected Apple that a lot of hackernews became EU regulation experts and started grappling with the fact that laissez-faire is seen as a dirty word in the country where it originated.

        • Elise
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 months ago

          Was that before or after hairdressers gave up on him?

      • Elise
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -34 months ago

        I actually appreciate the EU regulations. The real question is whether companies are creative enough to come up with new solutions that fit.

        • @rook
          link
          English
          19
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Do any “ai” companies have a business plan more sophisticated than

          1. steal everything on the web
          2. buy masses of compute with vc money
          3. become too important to be busted for mass copyright infringement
          4. ?
          5. profit

          I don’t recall seeing any signs of creativity, or even any good ideas as to what their product is even for, so I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for one of the current crop to manifest creativity now.

          Perhaps I missed something, though?

          • @BlueMonday1984
            link
            English
            124 months ago

            AFAICT basically all of them failed at the “become too important to be busted for mass copyright infringement” part - turns out actively stealing from some of the most litigious and DMCA-happy motherfuckers on the planet was an easy way to get mired in lawsuits.

            Bonus points for becoming essentially a money pinata for their lawyers in the process.

            • @sc_griffith
              link
              English
              144 months ago

              ai is a tapeworm looking at the stars and saying “I wish to become indispensable”

              • @froztbyte
                link
                English
                84 months ago

                Tschaikovsky reader detected?

          • Elise
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -114 months ago

            I get your point but I feel it goes a tad bit too far. It’s like that now, but it used to have the capability to adapt well and also come up with original ways of combining things. I actively leveraged that capability for my library. Rn it’s unfortunately on pause due to the regression, at least within the NL/EU.

            • @froztbyte
              link
              English
              124 months ago

              you appear to be lost, this isn’t “sama stan club”

              and by library I hope you don’t mean a place of knowledge other humans rely on

    • @sc_griffith
      link
      English
      164 months ago

      you’re learning from an autocomplete

      • Elise
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -9
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Well, I had three electronics experts who validated my design based entirely off what I’ve learned from gpt4.

        • @selfA
          link
          English
          134 months ago

          thanks to the EU, those three electronics experts are now 1.5 door-to-door vacuum cleaner salespeople

          • Elise
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -6
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I’m satisfied with the design and the sparring we’ve done.

            • @froztbyte
              link
              English
              94 months ago
              1. attempt to learn from llm
              2. have llm tell you about success criteria
              3. get some or other shit done
              4. ???
              5. be personally satisfied, individually

              new electronics design standard everyone! no more need for EDA sims, we can just ask this clever poster for verification! progress! i’m sure it’ll be perfectly fine!

        • @froztbyte
          link
          English
          104 months ago

          you just really don’t get it, do you?

    • @froztbyte
      link
      English
      154 months ago

      it’s not like things like this haven’t been posted consistently since chatgpt started on the scene

      oh no, wait, I meant the other thing. the one where it’s always been this awful dogshit.

      “imagine it’s due to eu law” what the FUCK? I’ve seen some wild takes but wow, you’ve just strength-hammered the shit out of the fair bell in a way I haven’t seen in a while

      • @bitofhope
        link
        English
        94 months ago

        Don’t you know? The directive of redundancy directive requires that human-facing software products continuously reiterate themselves for accessibility purposes. This supersedes earlier regulation, which allowed human-facing software products to not continuously reiterate themselves for accessibility purposes if the user verbally requests the human-facing software products to not continuously reiterate themselves for accessibility purposes.

        God knows why they decided that this particular EU law is the one they would actually follow.

    • @ebu
      link
      English
      134 months ago

      Well over a year ago it was actually useful. […] And it just doesn’t come up with interesting stuff any more.

      i have to admit i’m deeply curious what outputs you considering interesting enough for twenty bucks a month

      • @froztbyte
        link
        English
        104 months ago

        love how they edited their comment to be “more specific” and just made it even worse

    • @EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -34 months ago

      It always uses the numbered list format even when I specifically ask it not to.

      Yeah this one is pretty annoying