• Fandangalo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 days ago

      I think I mean like in a movie.

      A trope now is a widow looking at someone who passed with some longing. We’re starting to see more stories about the “AI afterlife” industry. I don’t think it’s long before movies or shows incorporate this hellscape we live into the plot.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s pretty close to the plot of Upload, where people choose to upload their personality into a hologram, so they can exist forever. I think. Its been awhile since I watched it.

        • Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Closer to a plot of one of the black mirror episodes.

          Upload is more like the digital afterlife stores full memories and people, not echoes of people

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    20 days ago

    Yeah the future is now: there’s an entire subreddit devoted to deepfaking porn videos of dead women (and it has been around for years! What a great website!)

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 days ago

        You should probably take solace from the fact that there’s still depths of depravity of which you are unaware!

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          Oh, yeah, a friend ruined me for life, when he said he doesn’t like to watch horror movies, because he is always reminded that he knows that whatever happens in those movies, far, far worse stuff is happening in real life somewhere. I always think that now, whenever I watch a scary movie.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        I remember when the Internet first came along, and everybody was so excited about the future potential for the improvement of mankind, and I just kept thinking:

        “Have you ever met any People? This going to get really bad.”

        • kelpie_is_trying@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          I dont think normies are the folks -checks notes- making porn of people’s dead loved ones. Nothing about that is normal. Even before that, I’ve met people. They’ll ruin anything if you let em, even the good ones in spaces that stretch and skew liberties like the web. Just cant agree on this one.

    • Fandangalo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      Oh geez… I haven’t been to Reddit in a few years. Having that be the draw or main aspect of the subreddit just seems really weird.

      I can see this being more prominent the closer someone was to their peak, like someone who passed in their 20s or 30s. It’s a sad outcome of our times.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        From what I remember it was mostly a control-over-their-body thing. “Ha, I can make porn of you and you can’t stop me” sorta deal. Deeply horrible, though I did just check and it looks like it’s either been taken down or I can’t find it, so there’s that…!

        • Fandangalo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 days ago

          There’s plenty of places catering to that main version like you said. It’s been possible to do this video editing for decades, but the speed and customization feels like it’ll fuck society in unique and horrible ways. You can take a few banal photos & generate hardcore porn.

          I’m not a big fan of making shit illegal, but it feels like there should be some consequences to generating this content without consent, especially when distributed. You could turn someone into a porn star with enough time & effort.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            I’ve been swayed towards advocating that people should automatically hold the copyright over images of their own appearance - by no means a great solution, but it would work to combat the vast majority of extreme creep behavior until we can figure out something better

            • TheFogan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              Only problem is when dealing with things like, what happens when a cop demands to bury all videos of his police brutality scandal etc… Bottom line 90% of time when the pressure hits enough, the words don’t do it justice. Especially when the cops release the report using past exonorative tense etc… to describe things in way that downplay and obfuscate what happened.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                Public figures (oversimplification) already forgo copyright on their name and image, that’s why you can buy things like halloween costumes of trump & fat vance. You could also include language to prevent extending copyright protections in cases of things like “recording criminal activity” (i.e. security cameras or similar) in the context of reporting that activity.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Er… no, reddit still very much has porn. And it’s not deepfakes specifically but the premise of specifically deepfaking deceased people.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Not just that. They’ll offer services where you can text and talk with them and they will mimic the deceased vocabulary, voice, and tone. All for a very reasonable, and predatory, subscription fee structure.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      “Erm… all that data you uploaded belongs to us now… your dead loved one is wholly owned by the corporation. Pay up or lose them again.”

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        “Not ready to commit to our full package yet? For a monthly fee we won’t delete all that data we illegally collected while you decide if you want your loved one to be forgotten forever or not.”

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 days ago

    Is it porn the deceased spouse created or is it porn the widow created with the deceased husband’s likeness? And which would indeed be sadder?

    • Fandangalo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      If I was painting the scene, it’s probably a dude who loses his wife in her 30s. He went out to a date to try and rebound, but no dice. He comes home, looks at a photo, then generates the porn. But he starts crying in the middle & doesn’t finish.

      I’m thinking about it as pretty sad.

      If you want to make it a comedy, the generation gets all AI weird towards the end, and he freaks out and throws the VR headset off.

      • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        You could imagine a thriller version of this scene, where the AI starts talking to him and exploiting his weakness to manipulate him into releasing it or contacting aliens or ghosts or whatever the plot is about

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 days ago

    The issue of giving people ways to avoid grieving and letting go of their loved ones popped up a number of years ago when places started offering clones of your deceased pet. Even that isn’t a good idea, and not fair at all to the animal. But it’s not good for the mental well being of the person. Death is part of life, and pretending someone is still here is not healthy.

    • Fandangalo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      I agree. I’ve been watching the AI afterlife industry coming online, and it feels really bizarre. One aspect is replicating a loved one in text or audio.

      However, AI porn from banal photos will be a problem. It feels a little like Pandora’s box, and I don’t think the public knows how bad the problem will be. The public has been uploading photos & videos of themselves for years. It’s not trivial to make deepfakes, but it will, sooner than most people think.

      And with that comes the combination of these things. A grieving loved one, maybe watching on VR, with generated porn from someone the passed. It feels like some messed up cyberpunk necrophilia, but I can see someone doing it too.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Considering that my grief towards deceased pets is for their loss (i.e. they no longer get to experience life), cloning is not only ineffective but outright disrespectful.

      A cloned pet doesn’t continue that animal’s consciousness. It’s just breeding a “replacement”. And it not only deprives a shelter pet of a potential home, but the cloning process itself is unethical: (see reason 2 and 3) https://www.dailypaws.com/living-with-pets/pet-owner-relationship/pet-cloning

      If I had $35K (per linked article) to burn for cloning my deceased cat, I could instead provide lifetime care for an adopted cat and still leave a 5-digit donation to shelters, rescue groups, or spay/neuter surgeries. This would be a more fitting tribute.

  • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Certainly not in any big budget mainstream movie there won’t be, because the LLMs used to generate script prompts for the LLMs used to generate visuals and audio clips wouldn’t understand why a human using an AI to fake a human interaction because they’re soul-crushingly lonely would be sad.

    Honestly, it might even be generated as a “happy” scene, to show a “normal” life in the future as product placement for the AI companies as they try to exploit fomo to dig their way out of their inevitable fifty trillion dollar income deficits

    Wow, I’m genuinely not excited for or interested in the future at all. Oh.