edit: “Balkanised” is probably the right word, partition means to divide territory between two other states. If the US did break apart in pieces (probably in some sort of dystopian/everyone is going to die world), i wonder if other countries will try to nab bits of it (e.g. Britain regaining their colonies, Mexico regaining their lost territories, Spain regaining Florida, or even Russia taking over Alaska)

note: I am not advocating for the partition of the US, it’s just fun to think about new countries! Also, I’m not American and have never been there so I have no clue about the different cultures in the different states.

If the US broke up into multiple pieces in some way or another, what new countries would you want to appear? (with and without considering for the feasibility of such new countries) What would their relations be like with each other and with other countries?

Personally, I would think New York (the city) becoming an independent microstate would be kind of cool, like the Vatican City of the stock market. The idea of “Cascadia” (which, to my knowledge, includes California, Oregon, and one other I forgot the name of. I think a bit of Canada too. The west coast, right?) could be realised, and with California, they would have a very beefy economy, as well as Silicon Valley. An independent Alaskan state could also be interesting, especially since they have a cool flag. Same goes for Texas.

  • epicthundercat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    Life-long Oregonian here, Cascadia needs to happen! Majority want it and we are sick of being held back by people we share 0 common interest, morality, culture ect… with. The United States is too huge and its ridiculous. Even the accents are slowly changing language over time. Plus, how the hell am I supposed to feel a sense of connection to some dude in Wyoming!? No offense to Wyoming but my state couldn’t be further from that life… Going to Amsterdam felt like what Portland Oregon would be if it wasnt held back by crappy surrounding red policy and federal toxicity.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    you mean balkanization, thats what you are referring to. it would be blue states allied with each other, and international allies like canada. the red ones will ally with RUSSIA , msb, possibly a little china.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    59 minutes ago

    Erase all federal and state government, only leave existing town boundaries and muncipal law. Every town must hold elections that year. Towns will then naturally start to work together via commerce, cultural and geographical ties and can create their own collectives/states. Or maybe they will become related and a part of Mexico or Canada and that’s fine too. Just have a rule that any town that hasn’t become part of another country must donate 5% of their tax income for a small military defense force.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Ohio shouldn’t be considered Midwest. It’s very much eastern seaboard and much more culturally similar to PA than the Midwest. Everything else is super solid.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        As someone who lived there for decades, nah its Midwest alright. Columbus is way more like Chicago than Philly, though it’s similar to both. I’ll accept Pittsburgh as Midwestern if they want

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They did Colorado dirty, including Cheyenne with Denver alone is pretty dirty but culturally colorado is much more on par with NM and AZ then Wyoming

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      As a Washingtonian, I approve and would welcome our kindly benevolent and woefully apologetic new rulers with open arms.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think you could call it Jesusland, taking the LORD’s name in vain and all that.

      Christchurch though? Totally acceptable. Pretty sure that’s a city in Texas. Or, take the Aramaic (language Christ spoke) word(s) for “promised land” and Anglify it.

      Anyway, which would your capitols be? I’m thinking maybe Dallas for “Jesusland” — it’s in Texas, and it’s far enough inland to miss a lot of hurricane damage that gets Houston right on the coast — and maybe keep Ottawa for USC. Except it’s not very centrally located… still might be their best bet since it exists. I sure wouldn’t put it in California (too many wildfires/earthquakes). I was kinda thinking British Columbia though (north of Washington State, bordering the Pacific). Like Vancouver maybe. Lovely area.

      • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        So fun thing about vanity, that historically refers to asking God for petty things that God would not care about.

        Like winning a basketball game, or the lottery. It’s “vanity” to assume God would give a bother about things so unimportant just because YOU asked. Because whether or not you win is (theoretically) more about practice and application than divine intervention.

        Though, obviously modern Americans don’t give a shit about what the words in the book actually fucking mean. They’re still likely to call it Jesusland, as likely as anything else, because even with the modern definition, they’re not likely to actually care. THEY are God’s chosen, and therefore THEY have special rules to go along with their special connection to Christ.

        You may not blaspheme, though. You may not exist in their presence so long as you are not pious, upstanding, and white cis Christian. Though they wouldn’t call you cis, that’s for some reason a slur in Jesusland.

        • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Because calling them cis implies they live in a world that validates people being anything else. If they wish the world didn’t consider being trans to be real, then why would the word “cis” in that context exist at all? It becomes an attack on their worldview, whether that’s what is meant or not.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Move the USC capitol to Milwaukee or Minneapolis/St. Paul. Both nice and central. Despite seeming landlocked, both have ocean access, Milwaukee through the Great Lakes and Minneapolis through the Mississippi. Plenty of industrial capacity and open land in the area if they need to expand. Midwestern culture is pretty resilient and underappreciated frankly. Minnesotans are basically honorary defacto Canadians already. Milwaukee featured prominently in Wayne’s World, starring Canadian Mike Myers (who started the recent Canadian “Elbows Up” movement) so we’ve already got that significant cultural connection there too. They’d be good choices I think.

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    How about drawing a grid on the entire country, and labelling each new square state in chessboard style? American streets try to be sensible and consistent like that, so why not just apply the same idea on a federal level too? If you’re in the state D5, you’ll know that D4 right next door.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      A single massive swath of Missouri River Basin, containing roughly the population of California and Texas combined.

      LPT could effectively break off, form it’s own country and win the upcoming water wars alone.

  • Redacted@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    100 states, just section out the parts of each state that are right and left. Would this do anything to heal the nation? Obviously not. Would it be really interesting to watch? Obviously.