“If you want to get into this bathroom you have to show me your pussy”
“To prove I’m not trans?”
“What? I don’t work here”
Every MAGA Incel will volunteer to be a Vulva Inspector.
The irony is none of those fuckers know what a vulva is, or any of the surrounding anatomy parts.
Truedat. The closest thing to girly bits they’ve seen is the instructions sheet for their sister’s tampons.
The quickest way to stop that is have them work a nursing home
Don’t be so sure
That reminds me to call my grandma
Alternative ending: “Now pull down your pants in front of this camera so we can use an AI algorithm to identify your gender. Don’t worry, the software is approved by the govonment and the pictures are processed by secure servers… Few days layer news headline: Big data breach, thousands of secure photos leaked”
Basically same as age verification photo scans at this point.
later*
I wonder… are genitals just as suitable for identification as faces or irises?
Sign here, initial here, and put your labia print here.
Theoretically yes, they are supposed to be as uniquely shaped in finer details as the finger print on each of your fingertips, because of the nature of the ontological process in which they were formed when you were a developing fetus.
Well theoretically anyway, I’m not sure if there’s any study that’s already done where someone actually tried to verify if that’s actually true in reality. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if it is true though.
I know it’s true of both ears and anuses, but I haven’t seen any studies about genitals. At a guess I’d think they’re too flippy-floppy for you to be able to reliably identify enough landmarks to use as unique identifiers.
Propably hair will render the scan useless.
So for this to work we would need a government enforced pubic shaving policy for all genders.
Do I get free laser?
Only waxing, sorry.
Damnit, too right lol
I guest that just makes for an even worse case for face scans than genitals scans. But if genitals scans are linked with name and address (because of cause they would be right) Im not sure what is worse then.
LMAO I guess at least genital scan would have the upside that people can’t easily take a scan of it without your active authorization, because everybody keep their genital covered at all time, and laws preventing attempts to “scan” it without authorization is strictly enforced. Whereas facial scans can be done by anyone in a public space without any authorization and consent.
But it does still have the same downside as facial scan, that if your genital scan data does get leaked you can’t just replace your genitals like you could replace a compromised password lol
Oh boy, I can’t wait to read a very levelheaded comments section
Pretty sure this one was posted already, and I commented something something JK Rowling.
Who are you, the Female Body Inspectors?!
Pizzacake the well documented misandrist? Why?
I’m pretty sure it’s not men, it’s just men exactly like you
You would lose that bet.
I have you tagged “the reason women choose the bear” over your behavior the last time that came up - you have a long long history of being an incel and claiming any criticism of a man is criticism of all men, which you’re doing yet again in this thread.
Just found out Boost also has this feature. Neat.
I do wish it was innate to lemmy like it is in piefed so they’d (theoretically?) carry over between mobile and web, but yeah it’s very nice.
Is there any reason to keep using Lemmy?
I greatly prefer the lemmy interface to the piefed one, and I don’t really want to bother migrating everything. It’s just a personal preference thing though, there’s nothing beyond that.
I’ve been trying to find out how to do that on Boost.
Halp.
Click on profile. Press three dots in upper left of phone screen, click “Tag User”.
Much love! I hope you have a great day!
Thank you! This made my day all the better
Does voyager app have this tag feature?
Yes. Long press a username and it’ll bring up a menu that allows you to create a tag
Mine must be broken. I only see send message and block user.
That is weird. Here is how it looks on my end
I think so… but also PieFed has it innately.
What? Where? How? App or web UI?
PieFed offers user tagging in both its web UI and in the API so that any app using it could pull from them, although regarding the latter I am not sure which ones actually do or not (Mlwm reportedly does, surely I would think that Blorp would as it touts itself as offering greatest compatibility with PieFed, etc.).
I’m told it does, though I don’t use it personally so I’m not sure how it works thru that app.
just long press a username --> edit tag
What a random mischaracterization, feels like I’ve been mistaken for somebody. Theres really nothing to even respond to, here, except point out ad hominem.
Criticism of a person’s behavior when that’s the subject at hand is not an ad homeniem, it’s the argument. You’ve got a long history of misapplying logical fallacies and taking these sorts of commentaries where a man is portrayed negatively incredibly personally and then poorly defending your claims.
For example: elsewhere in this thread, where you’ve refused to back up your claims that the author is a “well documented” misandrist. If it’s well documented, it should not be a burden for you to provide evidence, and yet you refuse repeatedly.
Criticism of the criticism of a person’s behavior, via attacking the person and not the argument, is Ad Hominem, and also Whataboutism.
Saying it does not make it so. It seems to me that referencing your prior behavior and attacking your lack of sources are both relevant and productive for discussion, while misusing fallacies to shut down arguments you don’t like is, ironically, a rhetorical fallacy. They aren’t deflecting by randomly bringing up some unrelated characteristic (for example: you shouldn’t trust this influencer’s opinion on food, I have it on good authority that they’re a terrible parent!), they’re calling back to your previous behavior in similar situations (for example: you shouldn’t trust this influencer’s opinion on food because they have a history of giving people food poisoning!). That isn’t ad hominem, or whataboutism.
If your character and actions might be damming to your arguments, attacking them is attacking your argument, especially when also attacking your sources! Ironically, continuing to attack the comic artist without citing sources is ad hominem, by definition.
I’m directly criticizing two separate things: your behavior, and your claim that pizzacake is a well documented misandrist. That your behavior is remarkably predictable around these issues doesn’t invalidate your claim; we get the conclusion that your claim is baseless from the way you refuse to support it.
Neither of those are an ad hominem or a whattaboutism, and you would be well served by finding out what those terms represent before you try and defend yourself with them.
deleted by creator
For the most part I like lemmy, but the community is incredibly incel-heavy. One of the most successful forms of bait on here (besides political trolling) is posting any even slightly contentious topic about women’s experiences in society or things like institutional sexism. Seriously, keep an eye out - it’s depressingly predictable.
She’s made multiple comics making fun of men’s mental health issues, she very much seems to have it in for men in general.
Having scrolled through a couple years of her comics just to see for myself I think she’s mostly just anti-MAGA and occasionally overshoots a little into common men’s issues she has a blind spot for.
I don’t think she’s misandrist she’s just not perfect.
I don’t think she’s misandrist she’s just not perfect.
No, but she’s a woman on the Internet and if she isn’t perfect, dipshits like @Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works will make sure she knows all about it.
It’s particularly ironic as OP was the one making a song and dance about wanting all comics from bigoted artists banned the other day.
With Jago it was really simple. Someone put the bigoted comics in the comments and it was really easy to see they were bigoted.
With PizzaCake it’s a whole thing! The people who don’t like her refuse to give any evidence. It’s almost like the evidence doesn’t exist.
I remember one comic of hers was pretty tone deaf and caused a bit of a stir:
Not sure how to find it, but it was supposed to be a “imagine if women acted like this to men” as a way to point out problematic behaviors men have, but instead of picking things that never happen to men for the point to land she used things that actually already happen to men. This showed she was apparently unaware the reversal was true instead of ridiculous which, yikes.
That’s the only thing I’m aware of though so not sure about “well documented”. Maybe there’s some social media posts that people didn’t like or something? That’s as much light as I can shed on the situation.
I think this is the one.
https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1dpptkk/talk/
I get what she’s aiming at but it’s a complete miss in my opinion. Men absolutely get mocked for all of those issues.
The getting robbed reaction is also true of men who’ve been raped or sexually assaulted.
I’m not convinced she’s a full on misandrist but she’s had some bad takes. Hard not to have some misses when you’ve made that much content.
At the rate she churns them out, yeah it’s not too surprising.
If she doubled down on bad takes it would really be a problem, but I’m not aware of that happening.
Let’s assume for the sake of discussion that you’re correct.
If a woman hates men, usually it’s for a damn good reason.
Having frequent or traumatic experiences with members of a group is not a good reason to hate that group at all unless it’s actually the group’s defining feature directly causing it, and it’s their own choice.
That’s different to suffering from trauma as a result, which obviously you can’t control, and might result in some behaviour that looks similar on the surface.
“Sexism is sometimes okay.”
You rn
Your behavior in this thread is proving me right.
So one case in a niche forum is proving you right about all men? Sounds like sexism.
Sexism is sometimes OK. Like in sport. If women’s sport didn’t exist they would have no chance to compete. Should we get rid of women’s sports because it’s sexist?
Wusha…
she is but i still like this comic
and i do look at the art more than the artist
Stonetoss comics were just banned here because people did not seperate the art from tge artist. And i hate to use the word art for stonetoss and pizzacake.
I mean, to be fair Stonetoss is both a shitty person, and a shitty artist.
That kind of applies here, too
Except Ellen isn’t a Shitty racist white supremacist.
No, instead she’s a misandrist. Misogynists hate women, racists hate other ethnicities, misandrists hates men. We should condemn hate at every turn.
Care to prove that? Because this whole thread is the entire community shitting on that same topic with someone else.
i voted against the ban btw
Well I generally avoid people like her, Kanye West, Stonetoss, etc.
misandry doesn’t real
deleted by creator
You can always rely on Pizzacake to bring a nuanced and informed take to a given topic, rather than simply making a strawman argument.
The problem is when you represent TERFs the way they represent themselves, they lie. It’s not Pizza Cake’s fault that an honest TERF is a strawman.
trust me. I’m a professional sexing agent with the USDOHS.
