• ElementalPhoenix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I think for the past couple of decades windows and mac have had similar levels of complexity for the average user. Most people dont do anything more than going through an install wizard

    • Wronnay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      But most Linux Distributions also have a Install-Wizard and even GUIs for installing software…

      I would even say installing a normal program on Ubuntu via the Softwaremanager is easier than installing a normal Windows Executable since Windows adds the extra Steps of having to search and download it and afterwards to read the software terms and mark the checkboxes

      The only more complex step with Linux is downloading the ISO and booting from it

      -> So just the Distribution of the initial OS is easier with Windows and macOS for Desktop, for Mobile we anyway won as Linux-Community with having Android on most phones

      • khánh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        but “exclusion” is, lol

        ps autists will not skew the results, there are vastly more normal kids than autists, and even then only a subset of autists are into IT, making the results skew smaller. i guess you could call it cherry-picking, cuz youre picking from what is supposed to be a random set of people

        • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I dont think you meant normal in a disparaging way towards autistic people, but I think the more appropriate word would be neurotypical

          • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah, that is an unfortunate clash between scientific definition of “normal” ie: a statistical distribution which follows a normal curve, or a sample which has very high likelihood of being part of such a distribution.

            I think this is also a part of the reason why many physicists use the word “Gaussian curve” rather than “normal curve” just to avoid ambiguity with the common word “normal”.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Since when did this become an autistic trait? I joined the school computer club when I was 14. It started that year with a single IBM PC. We did not load Linux because it didn’t exist for another decade otherwise I’m sure we would have. I have to believe that kind of curiosity and learning still exists without one needing to be autistic. Then again, under current diagnostics for autism, we might all have been on the spectrum since we were all geeks on some level.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Best use of a Mac is to sell it and buy 2 computers to put Linux on.
    To fix Windows problems, reboot (and pray)
    To fix Linux problems, Be root.

    • nummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I had a job developing software for datacenter machines’ hardware and software health. And the most common automatic repair that we had was escalating 1. reboot; 2. reinstall OS; 3. check hardware. I know it’s different but it was fun to see it “first-hand”.

      And also, “to create Linux problems, be root” works as well.

    • JayDee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Macs can actually be really good linux computers. It’s not always straightforward, but I’ve heard good things once it’s installed.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Anything running Linux can be good of course- just not going to easily convince me that paying double (or more) is rational.

        • Acrimonious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          I agree with you but you don’t pay double when you buy an old “obsolete” Mac and install Linux on it. Granted, my computer needs are very basic but my 13 yr old Mac is running better than ever after I got rid of MacOs.

        • sompreno@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Macbooks aren’t really always overpriced anymore. Macbook neo is among the best value at its price range and m5 Mac air is roughly comparable with other of its tier.

          Not sure if either can run Linux yet tho

          • Xatolos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            MacBook supported for 7 years and then no more updates vs 10+ years of support on average.

            I guess if you dont mind the forced obsolescence and ewaste, maybe?

            • sompreno@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Well yeah that’s a huge issue infecting the vast majority of the arms computing space which sucks a lot but not a uniquely apple issue. Windows seems to be heading in the same direction such as with the Microsoft surface laptops which also have a 6 year end of life and to a lesser extent most laptops have about 6 year of driver support.

              This can be fixed in most laptops by switching to Linux but the issue is still there.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Hey, if it’s an Intel Mac they run Linux great. I’m using a 2011 iMac running Linux Mint going on two and half years and haven’t had any issues!

      (I know that more recent Macs have Asahi Linux, but I’ve not used it and cannot speak to it)

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I remember this meme from when the Berlin Wall fell and everyone in the DDR got access to Ubuntu.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    The first 3 computers I ever touched were an Apple II, Apple II e, and a Powemac.

    Then I spent a decade in the Windows wilderness. Back and forth… Now safely home to Linux.

    Maybe not a good question by itself.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The question really does need to be separated out by era. Are we talking Mac System 7 vs Windows 3.1, Mac OS 9 vs Windows 98, early OS X vs Windows XP, Intel Macs versus Windows 7, ARM Macs vs Windows 10, etc.? Each generation had a different user paradigm, and people who were good with one versus another might mean different things than other generations.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That was definitely back before Apple went crazy with their whole closed ecosystem. Apple II feels a lot more like linux these days considering the amount of documentation available about the hardware. And parts aren’t locked down with serial numbers like in the iPhone…

      I had a lot of fun as a kid messing with an Apple IIgs. One of the games I had was “Thexder”, and you can probably guess where I got my username.

  • alila@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Why would it skew results? It’s a study of correlation, not causation.

  • Leviathan@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wasn’t autistic, I was poor and switching to Linux made old hand-me-down computers work like new. It also frustrated me a lot, but that’s part of the game.

  • alecsargent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is the hypothesis that people in those two OS’s have no clue about other OS’s and the one thats looks like a fruit have a superiority complex?

    • thain@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 day ago

      i think the hypothesis is that windows kids have general tech literacy and problem solving skills and OSX kids dont. and linux users are autustic ;-]

      • dudeface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        The most powerful things windows can do are gui based and the most powerful things macos can do are in the cli

        Not saying everyone bothers going that deep but there is a reason most software engineers and other professionals would prefer mac over windows

        Windows is an inconsistent mess and their terminal tools are afterthoughts

        • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The most powerful stuff will always be script/CLI/shell based. Guis only work so and so well, but having multi step procedures requires something else.

          Windows included

        • glibg10b@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I don’t know if that’s accurate. Have you seen PowerShell? It’s so good, some people install it on Linux to use as their main shell

          • dudeface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Nonsense, c# developers might install it on Linux but nobody who understands unix like systems considers it

            • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              This is incorrect. And the GNU tools would be much better if they were object-oriented like PS is. No I don’t have PS on my personal machines (Cachy btw) but that’s genuinely a super great feature. It’s an idea who’s time has come (ages ago)

            • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              That might be true if *NIX had another shell with an object-based pipeline, or if PowerShell wasn’t object-based

              I’d argue most people who dismiss PowerShell offhand like that don’t understand it particularly well

              • dudeface@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Most gnu / bad tools are essentially objects, you just have to xarg the column you want

                Object orientated anything is pretty terrible

              • dudeface@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I use it daily, there is no point putting it on a unix like system

                One day we will be rid of windows servers and I won’t have to use poweshell ever again

                • Hawke@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  And that’ll be a sad day; powershell is one of approximately two great things that Microsoft ever did.

                  It’s a little verbose in its commands, but it’s very good.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That would be a very weird conclusion when Macs were generally the ones taught in school, and are also based on BSD.

        • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          1 day ago

          A lot of apple’s design philosophy hides the technical detail, to try and create a friction-free user experience. Android does the same thing, but apple were doing it earlier and on desktop devices to some extent. Windows back in the day was significantly more transparent, although I don’t know if I can say the same for modern windows

          That’s well and good for some things, but the concern that it reduces the natural tendency to become highly tech literate is genuine.

          • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            add to that that for some time in history it was quite common to build your own pc (something that abviously went away with rise of laptops), which required whole other level of understanding.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            This has been my experience and have anecdotal evidence of people who can use a Mac but don’t understand any of it. One customer we had problems with until we just cut it off was that she’d have issues with her Mac and couldn’t navigate it effectively to try troubleshooting. She didn’t understand how to install on it so we could run remote management software.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            You used entirely different OSes than me then. Macs were not easy to use while windows was standard. If you were using a Mac you were learning a lot more since the majority of PCs in homes were windows and you didn’t have to do anything on them.

            • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              No. The only hard thing with macs was and is tivoization, because they want to decide what you can install and what not; that’s the reason why jailbreaks and things as brew and all that had to be created.

        • ReptilianCleric@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Apple hasn’t always used a Unix-like system, though. The old Mac OS on those school computers was it’s own beast.

          And now it seems like schools go for either chromebooks or tablets anyway.

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          your car’s main control unit may also be based on bsd (i have no idea whether that is in fact the case) but surprisingly most people would not call themselves experts on car electronic just because they drive a car.

          while a lot of people considers themselves to be “it experts” just because they were raised by youtube instead of their parents since the age of 2.

    • nummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think one of the reasons is that MacOS didn’t really have any games back then, so there was no reason for a kid to be glued to their computer. And if you use something for a long time, you collect problems and ways to solve them, getting the experience and some technical knowledge along the way.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Huh? Mac had the better games! In fact I lived in the countryside and our school was mostly Macs until I got to high school.

          • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            You’re either very young, or didn’t have access to Mac’s as a kid. The games were great. Number Munchers was sick.

            • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I don’t think 40 (how long ago Number Munchers came out) can be considered “very young.”

              • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Yes, that’s my point. He’d have to be in his 20’s to have missed all the early Mac games.

                If he’s 40 he for sure would have either played them, or just never been around Mac’s as a kid.

                • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  He’d have to be in his 20’s to have missed all the early Mac games.

                  More like 30s. If you were born 30 years ago in 1996, by the time you’re able to use a computer it’s already 2000 and Mac is left behind.

  • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have full time Linux users on my team. I fix their code all day and go home to use all 3 os’s.

    Using Linux means you like tinkering, not that your smarter or more capable.

    • daggermoon@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my case, I used Linux because I didn’t like being spied on. I also didn’t like ads and I hated my settings being reverted after Windows updates. Fuck Windows. It’s an OS that doesn’t understand consent.

    • lemmygarden@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m an Ubuntu user and don’t give a shit about tinkering or being smart. I just like that it’s faster than Microsoft and isn’t Microsoft. Also when windows needs to update it’s a whole thing. Fuck a whole thing. Apple products are also stupid.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m sure sometimes your code needs fixing.

        But this whole thread is a bait. zzzzzzz

      • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Is this sarcasm? God damn I was a bit riled.

        In the case that I’m actually not understanding your confusion, I’m a Staff engineer for 15 or so devs. Everyone makes mistakes (myself included) and everyone is fluent on nix systems.

        But I’m running Colima and podman on osx because it’s a vastly easier os to use in a work environment. I’d choose windows + wsl over native desktop nix. And it has nothing to do with my capabilities.

    • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Liking to tinker things is somewhat correlated to being more capable or even smarter, though; I mean, you can’t tinker if you’re not capable and/or don’t know how to do it.

      With LLMs you can theoretically tinker, but in my experience, 90% of the output will be hallucinated.

    • Kichae@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The question the OOP is getting at isn’t about being smarter or more capable. It’s about knowing how to probem solve, which is itself about feeling like it’s ok to tinker.