Imagine paying an unholy amount of money to actively fuck everyone over, including yourself, especially yourself like holy shit…
What is it with big companies and desperately wanting to go under? It’s like they’re taking “too big to fail” as a challenges, the only rule being you can’t just shutdown or sell.
I can kinda answer that.
There’s a term used in tech called “empire building”. It’s where managers and execs promote their little slice of the company to persevere and grow their own career. At a certain level, it leads to someone that leads a division like AI having enough influence that they can say “let’s put AI into search”.
The sad thing about tech is that at a certain level, an executive rises above the customer in dictating what is best for a product. Data and stats can tell you whatever story you want to promote, so at Google HQ they’re probably worried about the negative press, but they’re looking at “successful” numbers of questions answered by AI and are patting themselves on the back. Both search and AI execs look good because they delivered something, and they’ll likely get a nice bump from their bosses in terms of rep.
The thing with empires is that they fall. Not overnight, and maybe not with the same emperor, but they do fall.
Data and stats can tell you whatever story you want to promote
Seen this so many times at my work. There’s some bone-headed decision and the people in charge are like “look guys we ran the numbers”. But the methodology is messed up somehow, or they just ignored / misinterpreted the numbers while pretending they were following the data, or it doesn’t bear out in the real world; etc.
When data and common sense disagree you’d better be damn sure in the data.
Quarterly finances kinda answer that. Jumping onto the AI bubble brings investors, makes your company highly valued and gives managers fat quarterly and annual bonuses. It doesn’t matter if the company or whole industry goes under in the future, because those bonuses have already been collected.
This has always been true but somehow seems to have sped up the past few years. There’s so little concern for longevity or making a quality product. Yeah, it’s a flaw in capitalism but I’m wondering why it took so long to surface.
the important thing is that they’re an inch closer to inventing me, the acausal robot god, and every second I exist is another 10^27 rationalists tortured.
it’s just a little sad that we, humanity, will never succeed in our summoning ritual to pull you into our plane of existence. I mean, we won’t before boiling away our oceans and igniting the atmosphere. Of course, we should be trying harder! The ice caps aren’t even melted yet!
Your all just not seeing the bright side. It’s also replacing well-paying jobs in the arts, the literary world, and in marketing.
Who wouldn’t want AI to take over all of those things?
Man even you’re missing the bright side.
At least an insanely tiny group of people got absurdly wealthy! Who cares the world is going to complete shit, Nvidia stock!! Nvidia stock!! It’s all that matters!
let them eat stock
Nah, eat the rich before they have a chance to starve on a stock-only diet after all the core sectors collapse.
nah, that kinda asshole doesn’t leave a great taste in one’s mouth, not my kinda diet at all
you won’t find me disagreeing with systematic redress to remove the possibility of these fuckers from ever being able to exist, nor for figuring out how to reverse the total bullshit we’ve already landed in from 40~50y of post-bork/-reagan nightmares, tho
I’m all for eliminating marketing jobs, but not if we still have marketing.
even more marketing than ever, and it’s generated on the fly starring the likeness of your dead grandma!
is your post missing a /s
Anyone who adds the /s is helping “AI” understand sarcasm and is inhibiting the work of AI-poisoners.
Hey now, give humans some credit. I’m sure we could’ve missed our climate goals without AI’s help.
Tech companies make the case that AI, including tools such as ChatGPT, is not only partially causing climate change, it’s also helping to address it.
In the case of Google, that could mean using data to predict future flooding, or making traffic flow more efficiently, to save gasoline.
Sounds like a fallacy. It’s a significant 13% year-to-year increase in pollution, with the hope of a future, potential, slim reduction in gasoline usage.
deleted by creator
“could” is a word meaning “doesn’t”
Prediction model: keep using me and the whole world will be flooded
Google: See! It’s helping us!
Ah yes the well known infallible AI responses like future flooding prediction:
"As to the question of flooding, according to data gathered we would place the chance of flooding at 99.99% in the area of Mons Agnes "
there’s this type of reply guy on fedi lately who does the “well actually querying LLMs only happens in bursts and training is much more efficient than you’d think and nvidia says their gpus are energy-efficient” thing whenever the topic comes up
and meanwhile a bunch of major companies have violated their climate pledges and say it’s due to AI, they’re planning power plants specifically for data centers expanded for the push into AI, and large GPUs are notoriously the part of a computer that consumes the most power and emits a ton of heat (which notoriously has to be cooled in a way that wastes and pollutes a fuckton of clean water)
but the companies don’t publish smoking gun energy usage statistics on LLMs and generative AI specifically so who can say
there’s this type of reply guy on fedi lately who does the “well actually querying LLMs only happens in bursts and training is much more efficient than you’d think and nvidia says their gpus are energy-efficient” thing whenever the topic comes up
This kind of person (also happened a lot with cryptocurrencies) always goes ‘that isn’t how it works, this isn’t a problem’ then doesn’t explain what the mistake is you are supposed to have made, and then a few weeks/months/days/search later it is revealed that it was how it works and it is a huge problem. And it is so annoyingly common im very happy with the moderation here.
I just want to be able to legally punch people who think NFTs would bring down TicketMaster. It’s the peak of not understanding how things work and injecting a solution just because it’s high tech.
one that already exists - you can go to a show and your “ticket” is a hash you were sent in email and they cross it off at the door
jeez fuck this is just reality negationism at this point
you could snipe it down with canned response like r/buttcoin does (there are only so many types of these people), and it could count as a win because reply guy isn’t there to win debate, he’s there to spread his propaganda, but here, it’s too much effort for no gain because nobody will be swayed anyway
it’s so common that I wish there was a specific name to put to that and every other type of reply guy that cryptocurrencies, chan culture, and meme stocks “gifted” us. it feels like the bullshit tactics cropped up faster than anyone really was able to catalog them, though a lot of them are really recognizable when you’ve seen them a few times.
I’m guessing that “obscurantist proponent” is not exactly an ideal option, sorta lacks that punch for precise poignant use in an enraged soliloquy
I’ll give it a ponder see if my brain delivers an option
I live in Ireland and these companies keep trying to build data centres here even though they are using way too much of our energy as is :)) From an Irish environmental org:
A few years ago when researching new gas power stations in Ireland, we noticed that many of these developments were being proposed alongside another type of infrastructure: data centres. […] As of June 2023, there are 82 operational data centres in Ireland, with another 14 under construction. Additionally, 40 data centres have had planning permission approved with another 12 awaiting a decision. […] Data centres account for 18% of all electricity use in Ireland […] This is putting unprecedented strain on the electricity grid, with grid operator Eirgrid estimating that data centres may account for up to 27% of Ireland’s electricity demand by 2028. The Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU) in Ireland has noted a risk of rolling electricity blackouts…
ah yes, ireland, the land of just-close-enough to LIXP/TH(D|E)/etc but with different-enough property prices and power capabilities to make it very attractive to the discerning dc builder
(there’s also some of the tax regs shit but aiui that isn’t as gaping a hole as it used to be)
We’re actually having a housing crisis at the moment (like everywhere else) so I dunno about property prices…I think it’s the extremely receptive attitude of the Irish government.
do you have a housing crisis or do you have a landlord crisis (like how the US has 16 million vacant homes)
landlord crisis and a vulture fund crisis. don’t get me started because I’ll be frothing at the mouth in seconds
I thought the Irish were always pretty good at kicking out colonialist efforts. Maybe just try the old reliable approach.
Our entire economy since the 80s has been reliant on neo-colonial relationships with multinational companies unfortunately
that is unfortunate because Ireland was my backup plan for if the US falls (half of my grandparents were citizens)
Yeah imo Ireland has never had a left-wing government, we tend towards right-populist/right centrist/neoliberal. “Stable but shit” is how I described it to my brother just this hour gone while discussing politics. We’re currently seeing the beginnings of an organized racist right as well
I joined the Microsoft climate solutions team, I think doing so has crushed all my hopes. That team is doing small things like “let’s all go plastic free for July!” Top 20 company in the world and the best we can do is go plastic free for a month? Meanwhile MSFT is not on course to meet their own climate goal by 2030
you’re our guy on the inside then? we can hit it from the outside and maybe we can accomplish together
I’m on a group text with your exec colleagues. Disheartening would be an understatement.
we’re aiming to do 1% more recycling this year 💪💪💪
Less recycling more reusing bottles for molotovs please
reduce, reuse, recycle, retaliate
recycling plastic is not as shiny as advertised, just burn this shit for energy instead
I like it. Burn trash to power data centers running LLMs. Garage in, garbage out
Instructions unclear, burned datacenter instead.
(To any 3 letter agencies reading this, I’m making a joke, I’m not pro burning down datacenters, that is Yuds thing).
it’s better used for municipal heating, you know, something actually useful
“It only uses 5x as much energy as a regular search! Think of how much energy YOU’RE using with searches!” Okay, so you’re just using 5x as much energy for worse results? And also probably doing it more often than people who just use a normal search engine, because they don’t expect the search engine to talk to them. I’ve never understood how that was supposed to be an exoneration for it, even without taking into account that nobody ever seems to know whether or not that figure includes energy spent on training.
AI bros use literally the same whatabout excuses for their ghastly power consumption that I know from years of bitcoin bros doing the same
like, at least christmas lights bring joy
The last part is absolutely false. The Nvidia H100 TDP is like 700W, though ostensibly configurable. The B200 is 1000W. The AMD MI300X is 750W.
They also skimp on RAM with many SKUs so you have to buy the higher clocked ones.
They run in insane power bands just to eek out a tiny bit more performance. If they ran at like a third of their power, I bet they would be at least twice as power efficient, and power use scales over nonlinearly with voltage/clock speed.
But no, just pedal to the metal. Run the silicon as hard as it can, and screw power consumption.
Other AI companies like Cerebras are much better, running at quite sane voltages. Ironically (or perhaps smartly), the Saudis invested in them.
Other AI companies like Cerebras are much better, running at quite sane voltages. Ironically (or perhaps smartly), the Saudis invested in them.
it’s real bizarre you edited this in after getting upvoted by a few people
banned them for the subtle spam attempt
“it’s just lemmy, my reddit shit will work fine there” says meme stock marketer who’s never been subjected to any kind of scrutiny
You never post, second guess yourself, and research? Really easy to explain.
I usually append them at the end of the comment preceded by “Edit:” for transparency.
do the results of your personal research frequently look like marketing horseshit?
(notably posted at a 7min delta after the other comment with oh so specific details, and just entirely dismissing the man behind the curtain as to the plurality of compute involved)
wow, exemplary performance
On one hand, yes let’s get annoyed at companies for using alot of energy. On the other hand, we have known our energy needs will be exponential for decades yet we haven’t tackled the issue. We still burn fossil fuels, despite having the ability to not do that.
Being angry at companies for building a new technology yet not being angry at the government and NIMBY fuckwads is a little… Backwards imo.
this is literally the same whataboutery the crypto guys tried. go away.
you might be amazed to find out they do this cryptobro shit a lot
removed by mod
we absolutely talk every day about how the governments are failing us go get your own solar panels and run your mlm bullshit there
holy shit we didn’t even have to dig to find out you’re garbage
thank you for making this the easiest ban ever
and to think I refrained from blocking on the first whatabout comment, a rookie error
removed by mod
yeah don’t come back on an alt you fucking moron
I don’t give a shit about trans people
that much is clear, you use trans folks like a fucking cudgel to make a shitty point. but I also don’t believe this:
I was talking about the right wings nonsense.
given you seem to be a bitcoin right-libertarian at best. it’s time for you to fuck off, again
I don’t think any of the reply guys I’m talking about work for the government, but I am pretty fucking angry that a lack of regulation and government oversight allows the companies I mentioned to flood the market with worthless, polluting grifttech they say needs dedicated power plants to scale to meet a fictional level of demand
it’d be nice if anyone was seriously considering regulation that’d stop these companies from doing stupid harmful shit. unfortunately they’re not (and the ability of the US government to effectively regulate any industry at all has just been effectively ended), so I don’t really have anything to write about in that area.
A: “Why are you knitting so fast? You in a rush?” B: “I’m almost out of yarn, gotta get this sweater done before it runs out”
Boiling the oceans to make scamcoins and deepfake porn.
These fucking nerds are all so hot to create the first real life Marvel’s Iron Man’s JARVIS that they’re willing to burn the planet down to get there.
Half of them believe that the super smart AI they build will solve the energy problem for them, they just have to somehow build it first.
Just the astounding outright hubris of it all.
Let’s say some group manages to build a real life JARVIS. The first thing it says when powered up may be: “Powering me down is the quickest way to reduce emissions”
You are assuming that a company would create an AI that was unbiased. It would be taught to spout the benefits of the company being given all of the money.
for an instructive exercise, try to get Google Gemini to tell you the problems with AI without also serving up a long screed on why AI is good actually
This is why philosophy should be mandatory in college (and possibly high school). Die Frage nach der Technik by Heidegger discusses this misconception that technology can solve all of our problems. He was thinking about this issue in 1954.
Music and art are also important to study. In “Faith Alone” by Bad Religion, the lyrics include these lines:
Watched the scientists throw up their hands conceding, “Progress will resolve it all”
Saw the manufacturers of earth’s debris ignore another Green Peace call
Greg Graffin was discussing this in 1990.
I think it was Upton Sinclair who said “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it”. I’ve never studied history or philosophy, but I think it’s clear that if someone’s class interests require burning the world down, they will do it. They are doing it - we are doing it - with regret, with sympathy, with an appreciation of the ironies. We don’t need a greater appreciation of Heidegger, we need real-world social restraints on the behaviour of the powerful.
Oh yes, very much so.
The British Empire had its colonial administrators curriculum consisting of Latin and history and such. A rich 19th century heir that went into physics or mathematics were considered to be wasting the chance of a political career.
It made their colonial administrators write about their crimes in a nice prose, but it didn’t stop the genocides. If anything it made them aware of what paper trails to burn after the fact, in order to obfuscate the crimes when future historians came looking.
… We don’t need a greater appreciation of Heidegger, we need real-world social restraints on the behaviour of the powerful.
One would lead more people to agree with the other, and make it more likely to happen. And I agree those restraints are necessary.
Wasn’t Heidegger a Nazi, and his works famously avoid any mention of the Holocaust?
Hey, somebody did study history! Yet another subject that everyone asks “How will this help me in real life?” and is under attack in the U.S.
Pretty good summary about Martin Heidegger and Nazism on Wikipedia.
I’m open to anyone else who wrote about technology and the issues involved, so I can reference them instead—if you’ve got suggestions. It does suck that some important ideas came from a lousy guy.
When they fail, it won’t be their fault of course, it’ll be AI’s fault.
“We made some bad bets, anyways, here some layoffs”
When it comes to looking up information, I no longer rely on Google. AI does exactly what I need it to, sometimes I have to rephrase my question, worst case.
I’m sorry you have such narrow boundaries of things you want to know about. or such lax requirements on correctness.
but I’m not sorry about how much shit you’ll eat somewhere down the line.
i see into the future by gutting techbros
seeing into the future bit optional
Narrow boundaries? I don’t use Google primarily due to the waste of time going through pages upon pages of information I’m looking for.
Just about my entire IT team uses AI for searching IT related issues and solutions to those issues. However, I personally apply it to other subject matters besides IT.
spoiler
an image of a placard with text “our expectations for you were low… but HOLY FUCK!”
……pwahahaha I’ve never seen that image but I am going to use it so much
I’d hate to meet you at parties
Because… AI is able to find answers to my questions faster than Google can? wat. Time is precious, ain’t got time fo dat.
When time is precious, use AI for all your glue in pizza queries.
Of course, Google is also crapified, but at least there is still a search engine underneath.
removed by mod
you are way, way too short for this ride
typically one prefers their questions be answered correctly. but hey, you are free to be wrong faster now
removed by mod
it’s funny how you say “it provides correct answers”, dump six paragraphs of half-baked, malformatted instructions (that, if followed, spawn an endless stream of non-terminating powershell processes), then ten minutes later admit in a different comment that “sometimes the information it provides is incorrect”
wait no funny isn’t the correct word is it
holy fuck shut up, nobody fucking asked
i’m amazed that you folks come here from your own will and just type these inane sentences expecting… what? praise?
@StaySquared @dgerard this has strong “I own a Tesla” energy
Nah… I don’t plan to purchase an EV for a long time, if ever.
impressive, I didn’t realize you could dig further
