Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • @KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    741 day ago

    I disagree Mr. Walz. Had Biden not sat on his hands after being given the power of god by the supreme court - we wouldn’t be in this mess today.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1323 hours ago

      Shit if Biden had engaged with the 25th amendment in good faith and we’d had President Harris for a year already it would have been totally different.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 day ago

      You don’t even need to go to the SCOTUS decision. Would have been enough for Biden to order his DOJ to immediately arrest and imprison Trump, in the same way that Trump is currently arresting and imprisoning American residents. We’ve done far worse to people suspected of espionage for far less.

  • @terribletzar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 day ago

    This headline is trash. He’s saying we wouldn’t be in this mess if they’d won. The headline makes it sound like he’s taking much more blame than his actual quote implies.

    • @Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      251 day ago

      I read it as “we didn’t win because we didn’t try hard enough.”

      He states pretty clearly that democrats need to offer more than just not being another person.

        • @Crikeste@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Absolutely. Harris didn’t do a single thing to show she was any different than a piece of paper with talking points on it. She did nothing to inspire anyone of anything.

          On their other hand, when Tim Walz spoke, I was fucking screaming in my parent’s basement critical support to him. lmfao He fucking got me going, I would have rallied behind that dude.

          But no, no progress, only centrist democratic bullshit as the entire country gets pulled out from under us

          • @straightjorkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            924 hours ago

            I’m just so sick of the bs centrist dem bullshit where they won’t pull left in anyway because they’re so focused on their big dollar donors

    • @MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      210 hours ago

      He’s much more down to earth than the democratic establishment, or even Harris.

      At least, this is the vibes I’m getting.

      I don’t blame him, despite not knowing that much about him.

    • @medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      522 hours ago

      Tim signed the bill that guaranteed free breakfast and lunch for every K-12 student in Minnesota public schools. No needs-testing, no “lunch debt”…just free healthy food for children.

      • @GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Like as if Biden did not find Israel. 19 billion dollar of our money As a Democrat, I expected Biden to do better. We already know trump is crap. One worse does not make another one good. Both parties are bad. United States is doomed with just two parties. I don’t want any of these two parties. What’s you take?

        If you want to win my vote and many others, know your base well democrats. We are not here to elect the least worse, we are here to elect the best out there for this nation. And don’t come btching here because u guys literally are the one that said our vote does not count before the election. may be it suddenly does? See ya in 2028. Hope u learn some lesson.

      • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 days ago

        Yeah yeah, continue giving excuses to the Democrats for not being as bad as the Republicans. They’re lucky they have supporters like you who will just take whatever bullshit they give out whenever they try and emulate the Republicans. Clearly you’re not satisfied with how right leaning the political system in America already is, you want them to go all the way. Considering how spineless their supporters are in making them shift their policies, I can see why they think it’s completely fine for them to offer mediocrity in the face of fascism.

      • @Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        142 days ago

        So the answer is to keep slowly sliding into fascism with the ‘slightly less evil’ party, rather than forcing their hand in the hope of democratic reforms which stop the slide?

        • @slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 day ago

          The system is absolutely rigged and there are no winners. Americans are never gonna pull a france and pull out the guillotines. They hardly even protest. And when they do it’s because they want cheap eggs, gas or bot wearing masks. Or when a new iphone is out, then they have enough free time to camp on the street for a week.

  • TrackinDaKraken
    link
    fedilink
    111 day ago

    Imagine Trump, or any other billionaire, saying something like this. Can’t do it? Me neither.

  • @RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    452 days ago

    It’s so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate. You do have to wonder, especially after how Trump was greeted by them, just what actually happened here. The fact is that the truth about Bidens condition should have been known, he should have decided not to run, and the Democratic party should’ve had a real primary for real candidates and new ideas. Tim Walz was as bad of a VP pick as Tim Kaine. The white guy as VP to shore up the right wing vote is a total myth. Biden was kind of the first one, then Tim Kaine, then Tim Walz. It just doesn’t work. Neither will Newsoms podcast attempt at finding common ground which he hopes will translate into moderate votes. Democrats really have no clue just how bad things are about to get…

    • @ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 days ago

      the truth about Bidens condition should have been known

      It was known, and lots of us were shouting from the rooftops about it, But Democrats and liberals did everything they could to shut us up, accuse us of being Russian bots, accuse us of helping to get Trump elected, when it was liberals that got Trump elected by ignoring the people that saw every single sign

      • @forrcaho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 day ago

        It didn’t help that the New York Times and other media outlets were all in on talking shit about Biden, and that undermined their credibility on the age issue. It was only after Biden’s disastrous showing at his debate with Trump that the average voter had any credible evidence of his decline.

        • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          216 hours ago

          There was evidence. There are tons of videos of Biden speaking in the 80s and 90s. Compare any of those videos to hin speaking in 2021, 2022, or 2023 and you could very easily tell that his mind had become a pale shadow of what it once was.

          • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
            link
            fedilink
            English
            115 hours ago

            The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right.

        • @ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          220 hours ago

          All we needed to do was take off their rose colored glasses. The evidence was plainly in view for everyone to see.

    • @uuldika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      202 days ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Newsom pulls a Tulsi Gabbard and switches sides. He had Charlie Kirk (of TPUSA) on his podcast where he “completely aligned” with him on trans rights (i.e. eradicating us), then had Steve Bannon on. That’s a bit much even for the Liz Cheney flank of the DNC.

      I suspect Newsom doesn’t see any future for his party, and is bailing out instead.

      • @RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        In my experience, the higher up you go in both parties, you tend to sort of arrive at the same places with the same people… and most importantly, the same donors and the same money machine. That’s the great thing about the U.S. dollar really, corruption and selling Govt from Citizens United to today sort of drives the bipartisan nature of it because it all greases the wheels of the two party political machine.

        I’ve listened to several episodes of his podcast… I’ll probably continue listening but in the first episode Newsom basically kept saying he only got into college because his scores were low and he played baseball. Then he kept backing down to Charlie Kirk, Bannon, etc, while constantly saying he doesn’t know what to do and kept asking them for ideas. In the first episode, there was a moment where he said Jesus Fucking Christ or something to Charlie Kirk, which called him out on it. It’s like, the very voters he’s trying to go after will hear that and stop at the first episode. He will gain no allies on the right as he abandons the party he is supposed to believe in, along with the core values he is supposed to defend. He thinks having a podcast with right wing guests where he gets sort of transactional on the issues. Like, do you think giving up the trans in sports debate is going to win you anything when their entire side would like to see gay marriage go away entirely? While you claim to still even support that? Do these people even think any of this through?

        If Newsoms approach is the best the Democrats have to offer, then it might be game over for a very long time…

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 days ago

          Newsom is an amazing combination of a spineless coward and a heartless monster that if he’s the Democratic Candidate, it might be the first year I don’t vote. I will NEVER willingly put a transphobe in the White House.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 days ago

        That’s EXACTLY what I’m expecting, when he stood up to Trump I thought he’d be alright, but the dude has basically been courting the Far Right and going all in on being as transphobic as possible.

        He’ll run the sadly profitable “I was on the Left peacefully drinking Kombucha and eating Avocado Toast like the next pink pussyhat wearing hippie, but then they went too far when they tried to tell me the Holocaust actually happened! They’ve gone completely nuts!” grift.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      And every time you point this shit out, people will stick their fingers in their ears and say:

      You had a primary and we all picked Biden!

      Ignore that the 2016, 2020, and 2024 primaries were effectively just for show! Ignore that they argued in court they have no reason to follow democratic policies in their primaries!

      Ignore the evidence that the media hated outsiders that threatened their bank accounts and loved the ones that increased them!

      Turn off your brain and cut out your tongue, vote blue no matter who we pick for you!

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 days ago

        Ignore that the 2016, 2020, and 2024 primaries were effectively just for show! Ignore that they argued in court they have no reason to follow democratic policies in their primaries!

        the law literally says they don’t have to lmao, go take that up with the DNC or something.

        • @yarr@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          Yeah, everyone keeps bringing this up like it’s some kind of dunk, but the DNC can basically run things as they please. Don’t like it? Start another party. The party’s procedure goes back a few decades by now. People act like when Biden dropped out they did this crazy double secret turbo maneuver but the fact is the DNC can put forth whomever they want.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 days ago

            literally, it’s how this works, go bitch at the DNC or get legislators to do something about it lmao.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 days ago

      It’s so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate.

      the argument for this one is that the super pac was biden/harris, not any other random person, so it’s questionable whether they would’ve been able to use super pac funding at all especially at such short notice, given the technicalities of super pac funding. The majority of DNC funding, sure, but super pacs are most of the money in elections these days.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 days ago

      Gavin’s going to run more Diet Republican than any Democrat ever before and that’s going to make even my “Blue, no matter who!” ass not vote for him. I’m already thinking about staying home in '28 because Trump can’t win a third time and Gavin’s a transphobe.

  • @WhatThaFudge@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    652 days ago

    “We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,”
    (Implies that if they(H&W) would have won we wouldn’t be in this mess)

    has quite the different sentiment than

    “Tim Walz says ‘we wouldn’t be in this mess’ if it wasn’t for him and Harris” (Implies its their fault we are in this mess)

    These headlines -_-

    Not that I prefer straight bias but we got conservative media calling these people cutting all of everyone’s safety nets “heroes” and this is supposed to be liberal media straight misquoting for clicks?

    We are in the worst timeline.

    • @forrcaho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      From the article:

      “We have to make sure that Americans know it’s not just that Donald Trump is bad but we’re offering them something better,” he continued. “And I think that’s what we need to work on.”

      That’s an admission of culpability.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    272 days ago

    i want walz and aoc in 2028

    we don’t blame you tim we love you ❤️

    • @nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 day ago

      I don’t love him, I don’t even know the guy and politicians are generally horrible enough people to give me pause.

      He DID seem to have the only decent angle of attack with the “weird” stuff so that looks good at least.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So it seems like it’s going to come down between Gavin The Transphobe and Tim Walz for 2028, and honestly Tim Walz is who I learn more towards, dude feels like a second coming of Bernie.

    Meanwhile Gavin started out in 2025 being the strong man who stared Trump down, but he not only folded, he sold out transpeople.

    Anyone who carries water for the “Transpeople are crazy and giving them basic human rights is going too far” is a danger to us all

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        The guy Democrats want to run for President…

        Problem he is a transphobic piece of shit who sucks the toes of Charlie Kirk

    • @Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s only if Trump gives up his power after his 4 years… very unlikely. He will just start a war and impose martial law or just let the supreme court add a law that removes the limit, like they already proposed and if that doesn’t work, voter fraud with all the government officials getting fired is easy peasy. I think it’s over there is no comeback other than a bloody and voilent civil war or fascism until imperial collapse.

    • @freely1333@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 days ago

      I wouldn’t even vote for Gavin and it’s not the trans shit he just did it’s that he stands for nothing and is just playing hang out with fascists. I’d rather trump tbh

  • @MisterOwl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1652 days ago

    Nope. This is on Biden. It’s his fault Harris/Walz were put into an impossible situation.

    That senile old fuck was supposed to be a one-term president. If they’d spent 4 years planning for 2024 instead of sitting around with their thumbs up their asses maybe they could have run a winning campaign.

    But no, Joe was too proud or stupid or both to stick to that plan. This election was lost the instant he doddered his way on to the debate stage on 6/27/24.

      • @kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        662 days ago

        Exactly, and it’s the third time we’ve been betrayed like this.

        Not going after the Bush administration.

        Not going after the subprime mortgage architects.

        Not going after Trump.

        Three times, they’ve had the easiest of layups for public approval of all time and they’ve consistently fucked it up.

        • @NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          222 days ago

          It’s not really a fuck up when they did it deliberately. Their priorities are in the wrong place because it’s an oligarchy.

          • @bishbosh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            222 days ago

            Seeing liberal’s repeatedly stumble in stopping anyone to the right, but having the fangs come out the moment they need to protect themselves from the left really shows that it’s not failure, it’s refusal.

            • @NotLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 days ago

              I see the same from the left though. Great criticism… of other leftists. Then defending authoritarian shitholes with dictators, like Russia. Makes no sense to me, it’s just tribalism.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                92 days ago

                That’s a false dichotomy. There are more political ideologies left of center than status quo liberalism and tankism. Most leftists are very much critical of Russia, because it’s an imperialist capitalist dictatorship.

                • @NotLemming@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 days ago

                  I hope so! I mean the left should be united against Russia but that’s not what I’m seeing, sadly.

              • @bishbosh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                72 days ago

                Are you comparing the political actions of the only ostensibly anti-fascist party in the US to the leftist infighting of posters online? Try organizing with leftists outside and you might be able to see the difference.

                • @NotLemming@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  It’s kinda difficult to criticise those in power from the left when there aren’t any. Is there even 1 communist politician in th UK or america?

                  People, including us now, talk online and share their views. I’m sure the same would play out in person as it does online. Maybe luckily, some political ideologies seem to ban any criticism by banning anyone from their spaces who aren’t on board with their agenda. So that at least saves on talking to people who aren’t interested in talking to others, only pushing their propaganda.

      • Pumpkin Escobar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 days ago

        Amen. 4 years to build a case? January 6th, spend 6-12 months and file charges. What the fuck were they doing for 4 years?

      • @ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        The Oligarchy will never convict one of their own. For four years, I said it was the dog and pony show. And in the end, nothing will happen to Trump. Here we are.

    • The Giant Korean
      link
      fedilink
      English
      552 days ago

      Lots and lots of balls were dropped. Garland didn’t get Trump in jail when he could have. Biden didn’t stick to only one term. A democratic candidate wasn’t really elected when Biden stepped down (for the record, I think that Harris was more than qualified, but a lot of people were upset that she was just “chosen”). Harris didn’t try to stand out and be her own candidate - she mostly just stuck with the status quo and never disagreed with Biden. Etc etc etc.

      • @ExistentialKiwi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        262 days ago

        Warning bells started going off in my head the moment that the Democrats announced that Harris was going to be the candidate after Biden dropped out, not because I thought she was an unqualified candidate but because there was no time taken to search for other candidates. Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people’s opinions actually mattered. Biden dropping out was huge (at least to me) because it felt like an acknowledgement of the voters who had consistently felt like they were held hostage for their votes because the alternative was a fascist.

        It doesn’t help either that they went on to repeatedly shoot themselves in the feet while chasing moderate Republican votes, getting other prominent Democrats to chastise certain classes of voters and breeding the same voter apathy that hurt them in 2016, and their refusal to acknowledge that what’s happening in Gaza is a genocide that we shouldn’t help Israel perpetrate.

        • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 days ago

          It’s also the campaign money, only goes to Harris, and not anyone else. They are legally required to return all that fundraising to the donors if they use a different candidate

        • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          122 days ago

          Yeah, the moment I knew we were in trouble was when they publicized that video of Obama lecturing down to some black men about not supporting Harris enough. Whoever thought staging that was a good idea needs to retire from politics forever and go find a field to stand in.

        • On your last point, I don’t think Dems could’ve done anything different. They’re clearly in Israel pockets and they can’t disobey their corporate overlords and run on a more progressive agenda. Only other option was to try hard to get the “centrists”. Incredibly disappointing as they would rather lose and go hard fascist rather than let their donors lose any money (how’s that stock market looking?).

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people’s opinions actually mattered.

          it was way too close for that, by the time you had found one, you would be weeks, if not one or two months prior to the election, with no VP, and only a candidate, you would’ve had to have started the primary at the time it normally does to pull that off, they took a gamble, and that gamble was that biden would ride it out, and im not really sure why they took that gamble, but they did, and they lost.

    • @Kalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      422 days ago

      A cascade of failures. Beyond Joe not man enough GTFO, the DNC once again anointed a letter instead of letting the public decide. yes, Joe should never have run for a second term. Given that he did, he should have dropped out sooner. Given that he didn’t, the DNC should have had an open convention rather than putting their thumbs on the scale in back room deals.

      Tim is 100% right that we would not be in this mess if they had won, but when is the DNC going to stop trying to manipulate everything and lie to us about it? They are to blame as much as Repugnacans.

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        102 days ago

        Because they and R are same team. I bet it’s like lawyers who viciously go after each other in court, them have golf and martinis on weekends.

    • @kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Harris made choices. She could have chosen not to adopt every single one of Bidens policies. What was biden going to do, fire her? If you look back at her presidential run she really struggled to articulate any policies back then too.

      • djsoren19
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 days ago

        What was biden going to do, fire her

        If the reports are true, yes that seems to be the case. I’m not really sure what would have happened, but she was absolutely threatened into defending Biden’s legacy.

        • @kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          102 days ago

          The president cannot fire the vice president.
          The best a president can do is lock the VP out of meetings. Bidens approval ratings were so low, being locked out of meetings would have cost her nothing. So exactly what reports are you quoting here, lets see them. I think you made that up.

          • @0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            92 days ago

            Bidens approval ratings were so low, being locked out of meetings would have cost her nothing.

            Hell, if that happened and we assumed that anti-establishment sentiment is what got trump elected, maybe she could’ve capitalized on that to win the election as a “new” type of politician, one willing to go against the Democrat establishment whom literally everybody hates and dig up the potential dem voters who haven’t had hope for change since Obama. Of course, this is Kamala Harris we’re talking about, probably one of the last politicians that I’d expect to pull a move like that.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      162 days ago

      Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump.

      Biden shares a lot of the responsibility, but Harris and Walz were running on fundamentally faulty assumptions.

    • @Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 days ago

      Biden made an appropriate decision to back out. He should have done it much sooner. But I’m not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden’s fault. I don’t really feel that’s fair.

      Harris’ main draw was that she didn’t want to do anything, which pissed off progressives. She was pro-establishment and pro-status quo. She didn’t need Biden’s help to not get votes… I have no love for Biden, but the truth is the truth.

      • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 days ago

        But I’m not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden’s fault.

        Inasmuch as they ran as a continuation of his policy, I’d say there’s some blame to be had.

        • @Xanza@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          So you’re saying that two adults chose to run an unpopular and non-working Biden “plan” which was proven to not work, and that’s also Bidens fault because two completely unrelated people decided to also use that plan?

          Does your brain not work?

              • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 days ago

                If biden hadn’t been such a mildewy dishrag of a president, his VP might have won. Now insult me more since it’s all centrists do when people expect better of them.

                • @Xanza@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 days ago

                  And again this is about you hating Biden. Which is fine, hate him. But how long are you going to blame everything on him like a petulant child?

                  Next week when you stub your toe you’re going to blame him?

                  His Vice President chose to run for office. She chose the platform that she chose to run with. It wasn’t Joe Biden’s platform it wasn’t even loosely tangential to Joe Biden’s platform. But it’s his fault in your eyes because you feel that she stole his platform…

                  Go back and reread my anecdote about the police. You made it even more relevant.

      • @timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah a bunch of people want to make excuses for 90 million people who just… Didn’t think it was important who won.

        Campaign was flawed but if people showed up to vote against fascism we wouldn’t be here. And there’s zero excuse for all 90 million of them to not show up.

        Edit- well, Im reading your post in a different light but, yes that too.

    • @NotLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 days ago

      They probably realised Harris wasn’t going to win due to the amount of prejudice and thought Biden had a better chance against trump (who they’d have guessed would have been axed after his loss and criminality, but it was a cult), but then they let Biden to abdicate because there was truth in the criticism of him and the media ran with it…

      At that point who else could they run? It was bad planning, not accounting for Biden’s age/health and the cult of trump.

      Also they should have given Bernie his shot. They didn’t want real change and it’s been forced on them anyway, but now to the detriment of all.

  • @melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    342 days ago

    honestly, if walz had been managed competently, I think he’d have been a pretty good folksy VP candidate. especially if he’d kept up on the ‘weeeeird’ stuff.

    harris was just a terrible idea, and she didn’t even push her strengths. it’s like she, and the people who put her there, were all trying to lose.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 days ago

      The “Weeeeird” stuff would have knocked Trump right out of the park.

      • @melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        without the genocide and harris’ being simultaneously a woman of color (alienating fascists), a cop (alienating anyone with a conscience), and an arrogant symbol of the establishment that let it get so bad? yeah, fine red mist. it was a really good strategy. and they just stopped it, probably because a wealthy donor said it made them uncomfortable.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          The correct answer to that is “It bothers Trump and Trump makes Americans uncomfortable.”

  • @maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    43
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t blame Harris or Walz. I don’t even blame Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is.

    I blame the Americans for fucking up the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history.

    Has there ever been an election so obvious? Even during Trump vs Clinton one could almost be forgiven for giving Trump the benefit of the doubt as a “political outsider”, but by 2024 we knew exactly who this fucking guy was… The fact that people today are acting surprised and outraged about all the stuff that’s been happening during Trump’s first 1.5 months is only further proof that Americans are perhaps the dumbest amnesiacs to infest the Earth.

    Literally all we had to do was vote against Trump’s particular brand of fascism.

    But Americans are the type of people who fail a single question true or false quiz because they forgot to write their name at the top of the page, and we deserve to suffer the consequences of our collective stupidity over and over until it is bred out of us, or until our society falls. The American people allowed this to happen–and not just Trump, but everything bad that has happened over the course of American history.

    • @Mandelbrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      132 days ago

      Nah it’s actually their fault. The fact that they lost when it was “the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history” shows how hard they fucked a lay-up.

      • @CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 days ago

        I like picking random bad things that have happened in America an tieing it back to Regan. Usually it isn’t even hard.

    • @laserm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      102 days ago

      The good think about the 2024 US election was that the choice was obvious to everyone who paid the littlest attention; the bad thing was that Americans chose the wrong candidate anyway.

    • @BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      72 days ago

      My favourite part is how he made gains in (virtually?) all segments. It seems the economy was their number one concern too. Imagine thinking the current president was going to make the economy/their financial situation better…

      Like at some point you just need to call out the stupid.

    • @LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      How dare you!? America is a DEMOCRACY, and that means we can’t be blamed for how we vote. If I vote for Trump, I’m not at fault for what happens. In fact, it’s Harris’s fault. She should have pandered to me more. I can blame her, and only one person can be at fault for something, so I’m guilt free.

      You liberals are always trying to guilt trip us leftists for letting fascists take over the government!

    • @Secluded_Serenity@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 days ago

      Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is

      That shit made me chuckle because of how true it is. Also, the way that you worded that is so perfect. Beautifully put.

  • @jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    592 days ago

    There’s no leadership void in the Democratic Party, it’s been Bernard Sanders for quite a while. Them denying this is to their (and everyone elses) detriment. Just run Bernie/AOC and let’s get this over with.

    • @geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nancy Pelosi is the leadership of the Democrats. And AOC was not allowed to become top house dem. They chose Gerry Atrick Connely instead.

      AOC and Bernie will never be allowed to do anything besides sheepdogging progressives into the Democratic party. And at this point it appears they are fully on board with that.

      • @SeriousMite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 days ago

        Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries may control the official party apparatus, but when it comes to communicating and connecting with constituents and energizing the base, AOC and Bernie are clearly the only ones acting as opposition leaders.

      • @CyboNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        At some point they have to fall in line and follow orders. Or fade into obscurity. It’s a truly shitty system. One long overdue for a big reset…

  • @CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    572 days ago

    The voters deserve a lot of blame here.

    You can lead a horse to water…

    Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect, and no single candidate is going to align 100% with your stance. Demanding that they do, or else you’ll vote for literally the worst possible option, or sit out, or vote a “protest” vote, all so that someone, somewhere will “learn” something is just fucking childish and stupid. And this will be continue to be true no matter how many times the Tone Police show up to admonish people about blaming voters. Sorry, not sorry: I blame the voters.

    • @Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 day ago

      Tim Walz explained it the other day at SXSW.

      Politicians are like teachers. If it’s Tim Walz’s job to teach kids about geography, and then test them to check if he taught well, if the outcomes of that test show that half the class passes and half fails, then the blame for that is on the teacher. The teacher could have taught differently, teaching in different styles to adequately reach out to students where they’re at in life and according to their specific learning styles. He might teach the same topic 5-6 different ways to capture as many people as possible.

      The Harris-Walz campaign didn’t do that. They had terrible messaging as soon as the DNC hit. When Harris brought Walz on, there was actual progressive momentum. But then Harris bent the knee to establishment Democrats, and they lost the election.

      I will not believe that it’s the voters’ fault for the election outcome. If Democrats were sober enough to realize Trump’s threat and wanted to really fire people up, they would have may the necessary changes to do so.

    • @anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 days ago

      Defeated Democratic candidate: accepts responsibility in the lightest possible way

      Liberal fanboy: Noooo, it’s not your fault, it’s the children who were wrong!

        • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 days ago

          LOL, I am a voter. Are you under the impression that I have any direct influence over the Democratic Party?

          According to your comment, voters are to blame, not the infallible holy party. So good work electing trump. It’s all your fault.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      132 days ago

      Nobody demanded that Harris align 100% with their stance; they demanded that she not be an absolute pile of shit of a candidate. That distinction matters.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        she was actually pretty ok? The one thing that was bad about her was the israel stance, which is like maybe 5% of the voter base that ACTUALLY cares about that enough.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          82 days ago

          So first a lot more than 5% of the Democrat voter base cares about Gaza. I won’t get into the weeds, but there.

          The one thing that was bad about her was the israel stance,

          No? She would’ve won at least two or three swing states if that was the case. Her economic policy (or lack thereof, more accurately) was horrible. She dedicated the final two months of her campaign almost exclusively to “Trump bad” rhetoric while not promising to do anything for her constituents. I mean this woman was asked what she’d do different from Biden economically and she said “nothing comes to mind”. Status quo politics just won’t cut it in this day and age.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 days ago

            So first a lot more than 5% of the Democrat voter base cares about Gaza. I won’t get into the weeds, but there.

            i’m talking about the voter base that actually cares enough to influence their vote over it. I’m sure if you polled the public it;s like 90% or higher who care about it at all, like 40% support israel, 60% against israel, and like 5% of those is “fuck israel i hope it burns to the ground and that palestine re conglomerates into israel” type of people.

            No? She would’ve won at least two or three swing states if that was the case. Her economic policy (or lack thereof, more accurately) was horrible.

            “her economic policy was bad” bro, did you see ANYTHING that trump said? Literally an irrelevant argument. Especially now.

            She dedicated the final two months of her campaign almost exclusively to “Trump bad” rhetoric while not promising to do anything for her constituents.

            I remember her talking about a lot of things she and walz were going to do, that was like a pretty big deal. Was their entire plan, not all of it was great, but it existed, unlike trump.

            I mean this woman was asked what she’d do different from Biden economically and she said “nothing comes to mind”. Status quo politics just won’t cut it in this day and age.

            yeah and? Biden had pretty good economic policy? Aside from the whole covid thing, but you have no choice there, unless you want a global recession, more like a depression. Again, trumps economic policy has been an utter disaster in comparison.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              92 days ago

              i’m talking about the voter base that actually cares enough to influence their vote over it.

              https://www.imeupolicyproject.org/postelection-polling

              bro, did you see ANYTHING that trump said? Literally an irrelevant argument.

              Don’t move the goalposts. Here’s what you said:

              she was actually pretty ok? The one thing that was bad about her was the israel stance, which is like maybe 5% of the voter base that ACTUALLY cares about that enough.

              We’re talking about Harris on her own merit, not about Trump.

              I remember her talking about a lot of things she and walz were going to do, that was like a pretty big deal.

              Like? Give me something specific she clearly said she would do for the working class and a link of her saying it in September or October.

              yeah and? Biden had pretty good economic policy? Aside from the whole covid thing, but you have no choice there, unless you want a global recession, more like a depression.

              He did well on the economic recovery front, but he or example didn’t go after price gouging. His economic policies were a step in the right direction, not an end state to campaign on.

              Again, trumps economic policy has been an utter disaster in comparison.

              Again, that is literally not what we’re talking about.

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                120 hours ago

                https://www.imeupolicyproject.org/postelection-polling

                Sample Online sample of 604 voters fielded from December 20 to January 07, 2025. Margin of Error ±4.5%

                thats uh, a really small sample size. Especially for a sample that’s supposed to consist of multiple swing states. Not to mention that organization is clearly either deeply embedded into the arabic culture, or arabic itself (didn’t look that hard) obviously that’s not an issue, we have things like AIPAC here in the US, it’s just, probably very biased. Which is why they exist in the first place. That’s kind of the whole point.

                Don’t move the goalposts. Here’s what you said:

                What’s the other available option? Voting for jill fucking stein? Who cares what i said, the facts are plainly evident, you have one really bad choice, and one decent choice.

                We’re talking about Harris on her own merit, not about Trump.

                and if we’re talking about her own merit specifically, i’d say she’s still a pretty competitive candidate, the voting numbers seem to agree with me on that one.

                Like? Give me something specific she clearly said she would do for the working class and a link of her saying it in September or October.

                she ran for a bunch of shit, notably the child tax credit, the housing crisis, the food crisis, corporate taxes, capital gains tax, there are a number of other things, those are the ones i can remember off the top of my head.

                He did well on the economic recovery front, but he or example didn’t go after price gouging. His economic policies were a step in the right direction, not an end state to campaign on.

                the price gouging one im not sure on, there was only really significant price gouging of medical equipment and consumables in the early pandemic months, which was quickly shut down, as it was deemed illegal, beyond that you’re talking about things like food, which struggle with inflation, and are also affected by things other than the economy, notably the avian flu for eggs. Consume electronics have gotten more expensive in some capacities, the GPU market specifically, but that’s obviously due to AI. That’s about it, everything else is probably going to be related to inflation.

                Again, that is literally not what we’re talking about.

                Who else are we comparing it to? Fucking god? IS the heavenly father himself going to come down and run our government for us? What’s the frame of reference we’re holding here?

                • NoneOfUrBusiness
                  link
                  fedilink
                  217 hours ago

                  thats uh, a really small sample size.

                  Short answer: Learn statistics. Slightly longer answer: 604 people is more than enough for a normal distribution to appear, so if the sample size was “really small” it’d be reflected in the margin of error.

                  Not to mention that organization is clearly either deeply embedded into the arabic culture, or arabic itself (didn’t look that hard) obviously that’s not an issue, we have things like AIPAC here in the US, it’s just, probably very biased.

                  Biased towards… Palestinians’ rights? The fuck are you talking about?

                  What’s the other available option? Voting for jill fucking stein? Who cares what i said, the facts are plainly evident, you have one really bad choice, and one decent choice.

                  Uh… If you don’t care to have a conversation then you should say so from the start. If you do care to have a conversation, then what you said quite obviously fucking matters. Also you ignored everything I said to claim Harris is a “decent” choice.

                  and if we’re talking about her own merit specifically, i’d say she’s still a pretty competitive candidate, the voting numbers seem to agree with me on that one.

                  What voting numbers? The ones where she lost all seven swing states? Also I quite distinctly remember a whole lot of “hold your nose and vote for her”, which isn’t what you say about a “pretty competitive” candidate.

                  she ran for a bunch of shit, notably the child tax credit, the housing crisis, the food crisis, corporate taxes, capital gains tax, there are a number of other things, those are the ones i can remember off the top of my head.

                  Quotes for those things from September or October?

                  the price gouging one im not sure on,

                  Again, the fuck are you talking about? Grocery price gouging during recessions is a widespread and documented phenomenon, and if you don’t understand that then you really are in no position to discuss the November election, because you don’t understand the people’s grievances that Harris failed to address.

                  What’s the frame of reference we’re holding here?

                  “Good” doesn’t need a frame of reference; it’s an absolute judgement. “Better” is a relative judgement that does require a frame if reference. Most people can judge whether something is good without being offered a specific frame of reference, and to most people a candidate that doesn’t even acknowledge a problem exists (again, “nothing comes to mind”) is not good.

                • KillingTimeItself
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  220 hours ago

                  in the context between shooting yourself in the head with a 12 gauge slug, and stubbing your toe really badly. I think most people would agree with me when i say that stubbing your toe is the best option. Comparatively, a good option.

                  Of course if you compare it to things like, randomly finding a billion check on the ground, nothing compares to that, but that’s an unreal comparison, you literally cannot base a reference point on them.

    • @ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 days ago

      Harris could have aligned with 99% of what I wanted, but that 1% was OK with genocide, and that should have been a red line for anyone.

    • @Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I agree, I’m also happy that people like Walz seem to want to give people a better option, making a protest vote even less appealing.

    • Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect

      The best I can do is fall for blatant Russian propaganda and then get mad when someone calls me out on it.

    • @LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 days ago

      You’re being mean to me! I hate you mean liberals! You’re always picking on leftists who just want to let fascists become president