• ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some people on my instance regularly get their knickers in a twist over it.
      Their reason: they fear to be seen as furries by people who don’t know about anubis and their mascot.

          • Papierkorb@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            48
            ·
            2 months ago

            The author thinks the same, hence why people can pay them 50 a month to get a non-anime version.

            • Zarobi@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              32
              ·
              2 months ago

              I approve of this business model. Make them pay extra for professionalism so it stops being the default. “You could be saving money if you just accepted cat girls” will haunt their dreams every night

          • ms.lane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            I won’t bemoan that, I just think it’s weird people need to get rid of it in the first place.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you’re running a business, whether you need professionalism really depends on what you’re doing.

          Medical software? Anything aimed at governments as your customers? Billing? Be professional.

          Literally a thing aimed at software engineers? Book publisher? Most types of online stores? You can be quirky

          • 5too@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The things that need professionalism seem like things that could pay for the non-branded version, though?

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Absolutely. I was just replying to the bit that professional is boring. It is, but sometimes it’s necessary because it’s what your target audience expects

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well. Companies, people about to pay for those companies for professional stuff…

      • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Professionalism” has destroyed the internet, we have tools like that to fight the enshitification that “Professionalism” created.

        Fuck professionalism, I want to see parts of the soul of the people who built the internet

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I personally expect professionalism from government websites. And when buying products and services from private companies, a professional looking (and well working) website is something I want to see. Makes it more credible for me.

          If the technical parts company I’m contacting has a poorly functioning website with anime shit in it, I’m definitely not going to run that by my boss lol. Sometimes the cartoon things can be used to distinguish yourself from the competition of course but I wouldn’t gamble on that in my field.

          There’s a time and place for everything.

          • hyperhopper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why does “professionalism” have to equal soulless? Go to Japan, tons of official sites and machines you interact with are full of whimsy and character, and they are known for being the breaurecrats. There is no reason that a funny image should be seen as “unprofessional”.

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Iffor my part have the experience when there is a funny mascot or icon which is a traffic cone or a cat girl, then I know the people behind that are professionals. The quality is good and nobody bats and eye about the mascot.

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It doesn’t carry the sort of seriousness and relation to the business/work that many associate with professionalism.

          having the qualities that you connect with trained and skilled people, such as effectiveness, skill, organization, and seriousness of manner

          It’s of course subjective but in most situations, I don’t think catgirl anime stuff really fits.

    • M137@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d rather not see it. Us non-weebs are force fed anime and related shit to a point of anger. It’s extremely annoying and too much get through even with filters in place. Weebs don’t understand how bad it is, and how not just being uninterested but actual disliking it makes the internet a shitty place to be.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Us non-weebs are force fed anime and related shit to a point of anger.

        Now imagine how it feels to not care about sports or religion

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m getting there with the cult of vroom vroom. Like gas isn’t expensive enough they burn it for fun, and our planet is literally cooking.

          but sports & religion 100%

      • normonator@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Add this to ublock to remove it. I am not a fan of weeb or furry shit so I figured this one out pretty quick. There’s no point in the logo even existing.

        */anubis/static/img/*.webp*

    • cepelinas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would remove it but I can’t bother, I just don’t really like that for browsing.

  • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 months ago

    For all the places I’ve encountered that used Anubis, I didn’t bat an eye because it fits the vibe. But then again, I am a weeb. But also the image isn’t even that egregious. I’d say it’s atypical for a cartoon character, but that might be because I swim snorkel in sewers.

    • needanke@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      My universities website uses it and they recently replaced the standard logo with a custom one.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jackal because anubis and you can actually change it fairly easy without paying the monthly $50 commercial fee, but they ask that you don’t.

    They’re using weaboo branding to hostage enterprise users into funding the project lol

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re using weaboo branding to hostage enterprise users into funding the project lol

      Would you say stores are holding their merchandise hostage to get customers to fund their business?

  • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    They basically use the WinRar approach adapted to Open Source. Anubis is MIT licensed, so there’s nothing stopping anyone from replacing the branding themselves.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      what?! I have to code?! Or worse, pay someone to do so!

      Me mad! me want free stuff, reliable, and quick update when I ask a feature to the person I’m not paying !

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m reminded of an old SMBC skit where a couple reluctantly hires a given plumber…who works as though he’s starring in a porno, and demands the occupants watch. They can’t really turn him down, since he’s the cheapest and most qualified in the area.

  • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like the catgirl. Its kind of a confirmation that the website I’m going to is “trustable” or indie/smallweb.

  • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I were an immoral corpo that has problems with cat girls I would just remove the cat girl without paying. Anubis is MIT license, they can’t even sue the immoral corpos.

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      It gives a superb message to the author though. About whose bug reports and requests get priority.

    • Holla@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I believe the immoral corpos are just sticking to Google’s or Cloudflare’s captchas. It’s how you tell these corpos apart

    • ikt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I use it because it compresses better and looks just as good, why use space when I can not use space?

      I tried to compress with x265 on the videos I host but apparently iphones don’t like it for some reason, but I just checked again and it looks like it’s av1 they don’t like, I might try x265 again but with HEVC

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Practically x265 can be treated as another name for hevc. Apparently apple includes a software decoder for x265 and not av1, so av1 can only be used on newer devices (iphone 15 pro and newer) but x265 can be used on almost anything. The vlc media player app might work, idk. They do have a software decoder for avif included tho, which is kinda funny as apparently it supports animated avif as well. You can literally just copy an av1 video into an animated avif and it will play perfectly fine

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          yeah you can just ffmpeg -i video.mkv -c:v copy video.avif and it will copy over the av1 stream without reencoding

          https://copyparty.adrian.place/u/tower.avif (1.5 mb animated avif)

          interestingly you can’t do this with webp even though that is also built on a video codec, webp only supports intra frames so it can’t take advantage of the similarities between multiple frames of a video the way avif can

          av2 also came out recently, it’s a fair amount better but there isn’t really a usable encoder yet (the encoder they made to test the codec, avm, is unusably slow, but they designed the codec for fast software and hardware encoders to be possible)

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            nowadays, for practical use, generally avif is best for lossy images (make sure you’re using a recent encoder so you get the new tune=iq, which is default in libavif since this March) and webp is best for lossless.

            for lossless, if you don’t care about wide support, jpeg xl lossless is usually best, outside of some niche high-speed focused codecs with even less support (like https://github.com/a1024/L1codec).

            for lossy, av2 is probably the best, though it’s currently extremely slow to encode and supported by nothing, but that will probably change relatively soon. It looks like av2 will use the same avif container and file extension for images.

            there are also proprietary and/or patented codecs that I’m not as knowledgeable about (including x265 and x266, which are covered by many patents but have open-source encoders and decoders). My understanding is that x265 is roughly equivalent to av1 quality (or maybe a bit below) and x266 is roughly equivalent to av2. x266 might be able to compress a bit more than av2, but it seems like it might not be feasible to get encoding to be reasonably fast, as that doesn’t seem to have happened over the past 6 years it’s been out. The only devices I know of with hardware decoding support for x266 are Intel xe2 or xe3 GPUs (b60, b580, b390, etc)

            • ikt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              wth https://aussie.zone/post/34604587 why doesn’t it play on mobile??

              edit: FFmpeg tags HEVC streams in MP4 as hev1 by default, Apple only supports hvc1 for some reason.

              You need to add -tag:v hvc1 to your command line.

              In my case ffmpeg -i ok.mp4 -c:v libx265 -tag:v hvc1 -c:a aac -movflags +faststart output.mp4

            • ikt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              funnily enough I discussed with my mate Mistral Le Chat about JXL vs AVIF and was like, why use AVIF over JXL, and it was like JXL is better but AVIF has more support, but WebP has even more support than both of them and decent compression

              So I ended up going with webp for my self hosted vibe coded image host

              Basically I’m now just waiting for everyone to catch up so I can go to JXL over WebP

              • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s more competitive at the high end, but this website has some comparisons of avif and jxl: https://svt-av1-psy.com/avif/

                (this project was later incorporated into other encoders as tune=iq, and is now default)

                That being said, I think the jxl bitstream does have a fair amount of potential that current encoders don’t exploit due to lack of manpower. I’ve been following development fairly closely over the past couple years on the jxl discord, I think all active jxl devs are there

  • vinyl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    it was funny seeing people lose their shit when it was implemented in freedesktop git repository site