• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    ·
    3 days ago

    SpaceX had an outage at their data centre, and because they sell computing power to other companies, it affected them as well.

    That was two sentences stretched out into an article.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      so it can be read like this:

      elmo’s datacenter is so massively overprovisioned that he can provide compute not to ONE competitor, not to TWO competitors, but THREE competitors, while still having enough unused compute for his own CSAM-generator/nazi bot

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            What are you? Our boss? Running everyone else on a quota? More than one person can be an asshole that needs to be dealt with.

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Don’t be that person. Different people can place different priorities on different goals.

              If you don’t like people interacting with things, then learn how to communicate better. If someone makes an absolute statement, as it was stated “the most punchable face” then there is nothing wrong with disagreeing with that.

              Words have meaning and if you choose the wrong ones you will be misunderstood.

              Simple as that. There was nothing in the reply that was hostile or demanding. It literally stated with sorry, and agreed that they are punchable, just that there are other persons who are more punchable to them that they cant agree.

              Which is entirely worth hearing, it would be nice to have a follow up with who else might be the most punchable, but you could have asked them that instead or attacking them for simply stating their opinion in response.

              Why you gotta be like that? Is it not okay to disagree with each other in a peaceful and consecutive manner? It should be but you are here causing problems instead of engaging with a good conversation and enhancing it.

              Kind of shameful on your part to start making judgments without any attempt to further the conversation. That’s not a good look. Be a decent person not an unpleasant one please

    • TBi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes but… will anyone say it!?!?!?

      /s

      Also thanks for saving me from reading it all.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    413
    ·
    4 days ago

    Because they all use the illegal Colossus 2 data centre from SpaceX/XAi/fascism central and that data centre went down.

    Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI all have contracts with them.

    When that illegally running environmental disaster of data centre goes down, all those services all go over capacity and you get 502 rate limit errors.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    4 days ago

    It was a good time to call customer service for a lot of products. Instantly got a human when I called newegg and she was so scattered she gave me a full refund and they paid for my replacement which was a total of $900. They were probably so overloaded with calls they’ll never notice what happened. They even did the fastest delivery option on a Sunday, it’s already on its way!

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seems like “instantly” getting a human and them being overloaded don’t go together.

      Got lucky in the queue too, I guess.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        Or just maybe the queue goes faster when the system can’t just stall everyone in limbo, having long"conversations" with chat boys that won’t get them anywhere and eventually quitting in frustration. If they all go directly to a person, the simplicity of the problems and solutions becomes evident and they’re quickly resolved.

        • SolSerkonos@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          chat boys made me laugh. An alternate tech support tree where the trainees only purpose is to stall you until the chat men come and fix it.

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Well it was instantly in the sense of immediately picking up, putting me on hold for 2 minutes, getting some info, putting me on hold again for 2 minutes, asking what issue was, waiting 2 minutes, heard them put me on hold briefly again, then about 5 minutes of apologizing while saying it will be refunded and replacement shipped. I could hear a call center like atmosphere in the background with quite a few people talking so I’m guessing it was all hands on deck.

        Next time this happens I’m going to call a few places and see about getting some free shit. Screw these companies, I paid enough with my time and their stupid bot answering system.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Having done customer service and tech support before, I doubt rhey were overwhelmed in any sense that caused them to do a refund/replace they wouldn’t’ve otherwise. That’s not how that works. Their rules don’t change based on call volume.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 days ago

    more and more I can’t see anything about ai without thinking its somehow supposed to influence folks to be pro ai.

    • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nothing in that image hints even remotely at computer tech though. The cables are coaxial. No one uses those for computer networks since decades.
      The cables look like those used for cable TV or satellite receivers. The cascade on the left looks like some HF tech. Wonder what’s actually shown in the image. It can’t be AI because AI can’t do that many cables properly.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, and this is how I know you never worked in the random standard production to miss the humor. Its a picture of a tech bro type in a clearly decommissioned closet stressed out about what’s going on, a common thing and always funny. I can just picture the tech on site in the next room replacing a fan on a much less “cool” looking appliance while that guy stresses out on a conference call with the “stakeholders” on his coax nest.

        Now that being said I have worked on places still using coax (might still be) and tape libraries, and all sorts of museum pieces well after you would think they would. But I can tell that picture is after decommission since it is clean. If that was in use it would be filthy and filled with so many things that may or may not be important/in use. Fans all clogged running at max rpm, and the smell… I can still smell it now. But then again I was the guy they called to fix shit after the local (often tech bro) it guy gives up so I think I often saw the worst places.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    nother reason to stop investing so much time,money, and energy in that stuff. not only is it wrong more than right, it is vulnerable to stuff a 10 year old could handle

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Just out of curiosity do you actually have an analysis across the board that your statement is correct? For sure if someone is using a model like chatGPT 3.5 it’s going to be mostly trash output so not all models are made equally. My experience of the current generation is models are pretty accurate although still require supervision. Like you can see the path they’re going down and they need some corrections here and there. It’s a far cry from the rampant hallucination just a year ago.