I’m pretty sure the account democrats deliver is not owned by the DNC and pretending it really was instead is vert silly and misplaced manufactured rage
It’s twitter, nobody on there has critical thinking skills.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
goddammit
What do you mean? You don’t like having to solve a mild brain teaser to determine what order to read posts in every time?
Looks around
They are still part of the party apparatus IMO.
I know this is a crazy thought but… maybe a random “DemzDeliver” account doesn’t speak for the entire party. Maybe this stupid ass two party system the US refuses to get rid of causes all kinds of different people to be a part of each one.
It speaks well for the leadership and big names in the party though because they threw Zohran under the proverbial bus not only not endorsing him, but some endorsed Cuomo while not trying to talk him down out of running potentially splitting the vote. Fortunately it did not but in that instance the Democrat leadership would rather have let Republicans win than an avowed socialist who is making change.
For all the saying of not letting perfection get in the way of good, a lot of Dems and neo-liberals seem mad by it or try to say they were behind him.
All those Dems who dogged him, still all showed up at his Inauguration anyway, to bask in his success.
I’ve hated Schmuck and Gillibrand ever since I read about how they colluded to kick Al Franken out of the Senate. I will never forgive either one of those backstabbing bitches. I can’t wait for AOC to primary one of them, hopefully Schumer.
That 2019 article is wild to read with the state of everything in 2026.
It is likely that Franken would have won the 2020 election, and we wouldn’t have had to deal with Biden or the resurrection of MAGA. He would have been a great president. Schumer and Gillibrand’s betrayal of their own colleague had severe long-term effects. I hate them both, so so much.
Fuck the DNC.
Nah, I love the DNC. I love taxing the rich. I love everyone getting food and healthcare. I love protecting the environment. I love continued democracy.
Fuck the GOP. Every GOP out at all costs.
I love taxing the rich. I love everyone getting food and healthcare
Are you perhaps confusing the US with another country? I thought you were listing things you like about the DNC? Because those things don’t exist in the US. If we’re listing stuff we just like, I like a million dollars and high speed rail, but the DNC hasn’t given me either.
Those things exist in lower amounts than some European countries because the DNC have held 48 or less senate seats for over 13 years, have never held a supermajority without caucus, and never held a SCOTUS majority. It is how the DNC vote, and it is their platform.
I think a better message here is “Democrats can deliver.” Socialists can enter the party and make positive change. In 2026, a lot of people have decided that’s not true, but there’s the proof it can be done.
The way that happens is not voting for the conservative democrats.
Well this is a dumb take (since it would quite literally prevent the “that” you want from happening). The way it happens is voting for whatever Democrat you can, and actively participating in the primary race so that you get the Democrat you want.
You could have phrased that better, but yes perfect is the enemy of good
We want Zohran Mamdani to succeed based on merit and real results, not promotoinal messaging.
Zohran Mamdani’s housing claims don’t show anything new. Forcing landlords to fix violations is standard enforcement under existing housing codes in NYC, Baltimore, DC, etc. That’s baseline gov work, not innovation.
The numbers sound big, but there’s no context. Over what time period? Compared to what baseline? Without that, it reads more like a press releaase than a real policy win.
Also, this is coming from a PAC aligned acct, so of course it’s framed to look strong. That doesn’t make it false, but it does mean it’s selecctive.
Bottom line: this looks like routine code enforcement being repackaged as something special.
2nd bottom line: come on Zohran do something meaningful, we’re counting on you.
He’s not the one bragging about this, the Democrats are
Edit: the same Democrats that tried everything to not let him win
Can we just be happy the guy’s doing something? I’m so despondent from the mediocrity of the average politician, and seeing Zohran get shit done is a relief for me
My argument is that he’s not doing anything yet, but I want him to accomplish something.
His plan for community grocery stores i freaking love.
I wouldn’t vote for a republican even for a dog shit picker upper position!
They’ll just claim it was left by a trans kid and they should’ve used the litter box.
Or claim that there is no dog shit, it’s just a liberal media hoax.
Also don’t disregard local elections or people who are pushing quality of life improvements that may not seem like a huge deal.
pay over $34 million in repairs
Isn’t that just called doing your job?
Proof that voting in local elections matter. I constantly hear from the “BoTh SiDeS” group that down ballot voting doesn’t matter and primaries don’t exists.
Liberals gonna lib.
Dog whistle right there.
Why would a US senator need to endorse a mayoral candidate I like him and and don’t much care for Chuckles but they’re not really in the same sphere
Mayor of New York City is probably the most powerful mayoral office in the world.
So, he’s still just a city mayor
If NYC were an independent country, it’d still rank among the top 10 GDPs in the world.
If NYC were a state, it’d hold about the 12th highest population, about equal with Virginia.
It’s population is larger than Hong Kong, larger than Laos…almost as large as Switzerland, Austria, Greece.
To say he is “just the mayor of a city” is like saying Eric Clapton is still “just a guitar player”.
He’s still just the Mayor of a city
You’re right. His role as the rapper Mr Cardamom dwarfs any role as "just’ the mayor of a city.
Ok buddy
They’re all spineless geriatric leeches. I just wish one of them had an original mandate that they would stand behind, even if I disagree with it. But unfortunately, the voting system doesn’t afford it
There’s literally a picture of Zohran Mamdani in this post
? Talking about senators, literally the only one who seems to be for something, is Bernie.
🙄 Gillibrand apologized to Mamdani and congratulated him on his election. Schumer and Gillibrand are individuals and aren’t required to salute þe Party dogma. Anthony Zenkus’ desperation to build his narrative is paþetic.
Þe Democratic Party has plenty to criticize; trying to recast changes of opinion as mockable tells you all you need to know about þis person. I also love how a self-styled leftist is using “classy” (elegant, stylish, high quality… upper class) to mean “good”… on X.
I don’t think you know what “classy” meant in this context. It’s an insult. When used to describe a person, it’s almost always an insult.
Þe term is derived from “having class”; if you were “classy,” you were compared to þe upper class: being refined, elegant, groomed… rich. When used like þis, it’s being used ironically. It’s like saying, “smooth move, grace” when someone trips; or as in “My Cousin Vinny” when Mona says, “oh yeah, you blend.” It’s clear he doesn’t blend, at all. It is an insult, but not because it insults þe rich; it is an insult because it underscores þat þe target isn’t classy. Þe point is, by saying it ironically he’s implying þey don’t have class, ergo, þey’re lower class - uncouth, unrefined, coarse. Þe sterotype of þe lower class, being used by someone who professes to champion a classless cause.
He’s literally a Democrat
Because there are only two parties and you have to pick one. They constantly undermine him.
34 million and only 6000 apartments.
Efficiency is the key issue everyone fails at here.
He needs to aim bigger, to solve most problems with one stroke.
6000 in 4 months with the system he inherited is still more that previously. Why do you think this is his final goal? Of course he’s aiming higher.
As opposed to… 0 million spent and 0 apartments improved on the last 25 years?
How do you eat an elephant?
To quote Gavin “It would take several days of munching and chewing.”
You start by killing the elephant.
Problem is too many Dems are trying to work with the elephant to reach a consensus.
It’s an expression. The answer is “one bite at a time.” When dealing with a large problem, you have to break it down into many small parts.
I know the expression. But an issue we run across a lot on the left is either being too accommodating to the opposition or trying to skip steps out of excitement.
Mandami is stuck in an intersection of both issues. Establishment Dems are trying to work with the elephants, progressives want the meal to be finished, and Mandami is in the middle trying to keep peace with both sides by refusing to kill the elephant but still trying to eat it.
Username checks out
Ah he usually posts some stupid ass comments
He’s a mayor not a dictator…
