• redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      10 days ago

      Which is kind of wild, because I don’t know if a steak has ever looked better on film than the cut shown in this scene. I understand that sentiment may not hold true for folks on vegetarian or vegan diets based on ethical grounds, but that may as well be the Platonic ideal of “fancy steak”.

        • tresspass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 days ago

          I make mushroom steak from lions mane. My meat eater friends say its a pretty damn good substitute

        • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 days ago

          I eat smart things only to get smarter. You are what you eat after all. Octoponi, Chimpansessies, Peeps, Dolphones, etc. Ant too since I want hive mind. My brain grows.

        • decolo@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Same. cephalopods in general for me. I still feel bad about eating meat otherwise but I can’t even think about eating octopus

        • wheez@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I think this is a very arbitrary line to draw, and I honestly don’t think it’s backed up by science. Octopuses may outperform pigs and cows at some tasks, but how do you measure their overall intelligence in a way that’s comparable?

    • CowboyKermit@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Just realised looking at this that it’s the same actor as Ralph from The Sopranos. I’ve watched both recently too!

  • CheesyFingers@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Non-vegans should support vegans, even if they continue to eat meat, because vegans drive better treatment of animals and also drive more attractive non-animal food options.

    However, a person must have a brain and also not have meat eating tied to their masculinity.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah, you can’t say the conditions we’re subjecting livestock to is “good”. You don’t give up your rights to eat bbq if you admit it.

    • PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      Non-vegans should support vegans

      What really drives me mad is that there’s a dead simple solution - lab-grown meat - that can obviously be the best of both worlds with a bit more development (and in fact is being commercialized already), but is being lobbied against by the meat industry precisely because it’ll be cheaper and better. And nobody seems to be talking about it.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      My meat eating isn’t even close to being tied to my masculinity. I hardly even care how myself and others perceive my masculinity.

      My meat eating is nearly entirely tied to my enjoyment of the taste of meat.

  • KimLuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    10 days ago

    Everyone I know actually unironically feels this way lol and always comes to me for advice on going more vegan. Vegan hatred is a strong flea dip for me though, basically any% criticism of vegans ensures I will likely never speak to you again.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Is it awful of me to have stopped eating meat from animals I think are beautiful and sweet, like cows and pigs, but still eat meat from some animals I think are ugly and mean, like chickens and sheeps?

      • 5318008@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        If I go out into the woods and kill a person to eat, it is better than if I enslave a family, force them to breed, and then eat them one by one in perpetuity.

        Similarly, hunting is better than factory farming, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good thing to do, outside of some niche conservation projects.

      • Schmoo@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Are you doing it for sport or are you doing it to meet nutritional needs in lieu of factory farming / expensive and mass-produced plant proteins? This might be a controversial take but IMO hunting wild game can be morally superior to going vegan using supermarket products because of the ecologically destructive nature of modern industrial agriculture. Hunting can be done responsibly in a way that does not harm or even benefits the ecosystem, but it’s very difficult to exercise moral discretion in all of your grocery purchases due to a lack of transparency in supply chains.

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          To meet nutritional needs in lieu of factory farming / expensive and mass-produced plant proteins!

          I’ve also been contemplating a small flock of chickens.

  • bloomnolia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Just eat less meat. You don’t have to go 0-100. Skip the patty, skip the filet. Double up on proteins. Dairy shouldn’t be an end goal but substitute the actual meat for dairy for at least some reduction. Pick the food that is vegan instead of the one using meat stock, etc. Little things here and there. Default to meatless, eat the damn meat if you absolutely have to. Increase this change over time, and make sure to add a vegan B12 supplement. 80% is better than 100%. 60% is better than 80% when you get there. Maybe someday you hit 0%. Achieve perfect through gradual change, don’t shun good if you can’t be perfect.

    • BonesawIsReady@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is the best advice you can give someone imo. Im like 75% vegan, still have eggs and bacon on the weekends, some chicken with dinner, some other stuff here and there. But mostly its beans/tofu and rice with veggies.

      Some people think they have to give up everything all at once right now and of course that seems overwhelming… because it is.

      • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Perfectionism is often used as a shield to prevent change or to avoid challenging yourself or your own rigid thinking. When you see someone saying it’s all or nothing they’re actively sabotaging themselves, often that’s exactly what they want to be doing, plausible deniability

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      One change I made early on was to look for ways to shorten the distance from my food, become familiar with how it gets to my plate and just keep higher standards overall for things like meat.

      The experience of buying meat in particular can be heavily abstracted and sanitized. Every big chain supermarket has an area with rows and rows of perfectly packaged cuts. There is not very much information at all about most of it.

      Pick up a Styrofoam tray of boneless skinless chicken breasts from the one or two giant conglomerates. Each package is wrapped in plastic. They all have very consistent appearance, evenly colored and equally plump. They are completely odorless. It is chicken but it’s very very far away from being a chicken. It’s been through a lot of hands and miles. You’ve already hit a wall, though, because you’re not getting much more information about that meat besides maybe some marketing terms and a picture of a taco or some shit like that. You’re being sold the idea of it. All of the horrible stuff is obscured. Even the neutral stuff like what it ate, if it was ever sick or given any medications. All that stuff gets pushed into the memory hole and is supposed to never reach the consumer. If you become too curious, and start digging into it on your own, you naturally end up consuming less. They know this.

      Contrast that with what’s produced more locally. Try to figure out who in your area is producing with the goal of building up an actual local foodway sustainably. How close can you get to identifiable people actually producing your food? Can you access a co-op, farmers market, CSA?

      Folks who do things like regenerative farming and try to build up their soil tend to be very passionate and like to share about it. Visit a nearby farm or ranch. Many have small retail operations. They may deal in larger quantities than you’re used to. Find out the process. If an animal is involved, how is it cared for and what does it do all day? Is the animal improving its surroundings or degrading them? Are you willing to meet your food face to face?

      IMO if you’re going to continue eating meat, you owe it to your food to unpack this stuff, examine how it makes you feel to literally “know how the sausage is made”, form deeper connections with your food and community, and find opportunities to make positive changes to your buying habits.

      ETA:

      not everyone will be able to stomach peeking behind the curtain. But that’s actually good. It means you’re a compassionate human being, and that feeling can be harnessed and channeled into better personal choices.

      I’m just tired of seeing all meat-eating equated, too. The Styrofoam chicken is in a completely different category from a fresh whole chicken acquired locally from, say, a nearby farm that prioritizes regenerative practices.

      Compare the true costs and impacts of each. You might forget they’re the same species. It turns out that, if you simply let a chicken just… do its chicken things and provide it with what it already knows it needs to satisfy its drives, its natural behaviors and outputs can be directed to benefit the rest of the system. It’s not easy. This is a complex system, and there’s a lot to learn. But if you can get it right, the chicken is healthy and satisfied, it improves other parts of the system during its life, has at least net-zero if not positive net impact environmentally, and you still get to sell it at the end if that’s what you want your operation to be.

      The best arguments for not eating meat disagree specifically with what happens at the end of, e.g., a meat chicken’s life. I know not to argue against that. It’s a principled moral stance.

      There will probably always be people who want to eat meat. It is very deeply ingrained human impulse. I think it desperately needs to be scaled way way back. The big players in the conventional national industry need to be seized and taken apart, yesterday. Everything good and useful there needs to be pried out of their hands, brought local, and distributed among the people.

      If the tables were turned, and local, sustainable models were the norm, we’d eat way less of it, feel way better, and have the community profit instead of extracted from. “Big chicken” would not exist like it does now. We’d be having completely different conversations.

    • wheez@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      While I agree with the sentiment, I still struggle a bit with this rhetoric. When it comes to misogyny or rasicsm you wouldn’t tell someone to just try and do less of it. The meat & dairy industry is still a whole lot of abuse and exploitation, and I think everyone is probably on board with having nothing to do with it. The friction is just too high I guess.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 days ago

        Actually yes you would. For the average person in the privileged position, “trying to do less racism” or “trying to be less misogynistic” is the crux of actioning allyship, especially when people are imprinted and socialized from a young age to be/act racist and misogynistic without knowing or understanding it. Kids can’t necessarily control that, but trying to undo it by being less racist and less misogynistic day by day is the necessary work of anti-racism and feminism.

        • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          It also ignores that even allies almost always still hold some misoginy or racism, simply due to upbringing. True allies have to admit that we’re not done progressing.

          • GripenGal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            Not only allies. There is a lot of internalization of misogyny, racism, homophobia, transphobia, etc. if you are a member of one of the affected groups but were raised in such environment.

        • wheez@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          I agree, but I think framing the goal is important.

          I think the better way to go about it is to commit fully from the start. Maybe there’s some hiccups, and then you can reset and try again. I guess it’s very personal however. Some people might benefit from another mindset. Anything that gets people away from abuse, I’m all for.

      • bloomnolia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The friction is precisely why I recommend start small. Better someone eat less meat and stick with it long term, than a full meat diet long term because they went completely meatless at once for a week or two and couldn’t handle it

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Well, frame it as “not one person doing it perfectly but thousands doing it imperfectly”

        • wheez@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m not saying it’s bad.

          Maybe in my mind, I just think it’s a bit weird to glorify it in a way. If someone would come to me and proudly say “I’m only 20% racist now!”, I don’t think my initial reaction would be “Great, keep going!”. It would probably be more like “Why are you any % racist in the first place?”.

          • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            All of us are subconsiously a tiny percent racist due to growing up in racist power structures. You’re not a true ally if you think you’re perfect and zero % racist

            • wheez@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Maybe it was a bad example, excuse me.

              What I mean is, some things in society are absolutely not accepted, and we wouldn’t congratulate people on just doing less of these things. For me, factory farming of animal products is one of these things. I do realize that some people don’t consider it to be.

              Again, I wouldn’t say I disagree with the original comment, I just have some conflicting thoughts about it I guess. Hope this makes sense.

      • TheSecondVariety@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        When it comes to misogyny or rasicsm you wouldn’t tell someone to just try and do less of it.

        Idk, these are very different things. If I think about how much I hate (some group) then I may be a racist based on that alone. If I don’t consume animal products but I fantasize about eating a cheeseburger I would still be a vegan.

        Nobody is going to literally say “just do less racism” but in practice we often only deal with small parts of someone’s racism.

      • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        When it comes to misogyny or rasicsm you wouldn’t tell someone to just try and do less of it.

        On a societal level that IS how we progress… Sorry but don’t let idealism block progress

    • LsnLDN@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      to a vegan it kinda sounds equivalent to “just don’t be racist most days of the week, thats a good start”

      • Dippy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Its not even close to the same. Meat is still food, and it is still nourishment to eat. There is nothing nourishing about bigotry. Its still correct to be vegan. But let’s be grounded in our discourse.

  • TuringCompleteSocialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 days ago

    Obligatory mention that you don’t need to cut out meat from your life entirely to have a significant impact on your carbon footprint and your health. Going mostly vegetarian is also an option and its basically been the default of humanity since the agricultural revolution.

    • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 days ago

      “But it’s awkward in social settings”, “What if I’m going out to eat”, “What if it’s the only option”, “What if I am trying but don’t realize something has an animal product”

      Idk dude then eat meat in those settings I guess. 95% of your food is consumed outside of those settings so just be 95% vegan or vegetarian.

      • puz@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        This. The stuff I cook at home is 100% vegetarian, which is most of my meals. I simply stopped buying meat when I’m grocery shopping.

        When I visit people I eat whatever they have, if they have good vegetarian options i prefer that though.

        When I’m going out to eat I do the same. If you’re not in the mood to have a discussion about it during lunch with your coworkers or whoever just tell them that you do eat meat but chose that one vegetarian option because it looked tasty or whatever.

        Since people in my social surrounding think mostly the same I’m about 99% vegetarian.

    • Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s really beef that is the vast majority of emissions just cutting that out of your diet gets most of the environmental benefits of vegetarian.

    • waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Obligatory mention that the “carbon footprint” is a tool of the billionair class to put all the blame that belongs to them on us, the consumer without any real power in the markets.

      So the best way to cut down on carbon footprint is to be politically engaged. Without systemic change your personal sacrafice will not really do anything.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I’m in this picture and feel pretty neutral about that.

    One time I had a hardcore combo meth-heroin addict who was vegan who candidly told me something to the effect of ‘idgaf what I put in my body I just have a moral problem with the livestock industry’ and I was like ‘you know what, based.’ The core issue of that conversation was that dietary sent a roll with dinner and they were like ‘naaah I can tell by the texture they used cows butter’ and like many things in the hospital they’re probably right and also at least they recognized I had no way of fixing it.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    9 days ago

    I forgot who I stole it from, but veganism is my favorite example of a position that has nearly unassailable reasoning, but is still utterly unconvincing to most people.

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not really. It comes from the position that animals are people, or at least more worthy of consideration than the wants of humans. Neither of which are true in the eyes of basically everyone. Now arguing against factory farming seems to actually be unassailable.

    • zen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The age old question. Do people make decisions using reasoning? Or do they make decisions based on emotions, and rationalise them afterwards using their reasoning?

      • reka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I’d say the balancing factor tends to be effort. We are, as living creatures, lazy. That’s how you survive. The level of empathy you need to acquire before the suffering of a chicken you will never meet is going to compete with your desire to eat easily available delicious food made from them is going to have to be very high.

        And once you make your choice you’re not going to internalise the idea that you are knowingly operating from a moral code informed by an acceptance of laziness are you? That conflicts with the self identity of being a rational and good person.

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 days ago

    Maaan. That is me, with so many things. At least I’m moving in the right direction, or so I like to tell me.

    • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s usually vice versa: someone who chose not to eat something is disturbed by anyone and everyone else who does not do the same

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Well the meat industry does in fact affect climate (synthetic fertilizers are made with fossil methane), which indeed disturbs everyone.

        But whatever you choose not to eat has absolutely no effect on anyone.

        • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          the meat industry does in fact affect climate

          true for any industry. look for how badly we have fucked up our soil

          whatever you choose not to eat has absolutely no effect on anyone

          it does. what I choose to not eat I need to compensate, so there is no choice of not eating something, only real choice is what to eat

                • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Possibly. Does it sound like “yeah, the problem of humans pushing other life forms into starvation and extinction is solved with this one simple trick”?

          • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            You forget to consider amounts. Some industries and foods have more effect than others, and the less you eat, the less of an effect you have.

            • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              *the less humans are on the planet, the lesser footprint we leave. It should be handled this way but alas, we are not even close

    • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t care what people eat. I can genuinely go months or years without thinking about vegans. I never challenged any vegan, vegetarian or whatever other diet out there.

      I have been bothered by vegans on multiple occasions including at restaurants more than once.

  • trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 days ago

    This is a super hot take so bare with me, but the conditions of a lot of vegan food production are also often harmful to the humans that grow the food (I’m talking blood produce) and the growth in popularity of certain superfoods have severely damaged the ecosystems that indigenous populations in the areas where they’re from depended on.

    This is not to say being vegan is bad. It’s obviously proven to be better for the environment, and the way that animals are treated is absolutely inhumane.

    This is to say however that we should be demanding sustainability in all our food consumption and respect for all living beings. But mostly, it’s to say fuck capitalism.

    • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      By vegan food production you must mean processed fake meat? Not all vegans eat a horrible diet.

      If you mean vegan food production as in normal non-meat foods such as vegetables than that’s a while opinion. Unless you are Jain or just want to die, we got to eat something.

      Most food production in general kills a lot more than I would like especially vegetable and fruit production. Not much to do on the regard though.

      • trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yes I did mean veg and fruit, but I mean that obviously we need to eat but we need to do it in a sustainable and fair way.

        Currently a lot of the produce in Canada & the US is grown by migrant labour where people are treated horribly. In Mexico, many of the agricultural production sites are owned by cartels. Quinoa used to be a primary food source for quechuan (peruvian indigenous) people but when it grew in popularity in the west, it became too expensive for those who depended on it. There are many more examples.

        What there is to do about it is to demand better agricultural practices and support fair-trade, co-ops, and sustainable food vendors. In the same way we should be / are demanding cruelty-free and sustainable animal products.

      • TWeaK@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        Unless you are Jain or just want to die, we got to eat something.

        That’s the thing though, why should plants be more eligible for eating than animals? Both are living. Animals are closer to us, so we can understand them better, but that doesn’t mean we aren’t being just as harmful to plants.

        I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with eating another animal for sustenance. Just the same as there isn’t anything wrong with eating a plant for sustenance. What matters is what we do before we eat them.

        • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 days ago

          Plants cannot think or feel as animals can. Arguing a tomato has the emotions and thought of a dog or pig is just silly.

          Killing a pig versus a tomato is not the same thing dawg

          • TWeaK@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            as animals can.

            As we can. We understand how animals think, because evolutionarily they’re closer to us. We don’t really understand how plants “think” or “feel”, we just decide that because they don’t have what we have that makes it okay.

            • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              10 days ago

              Just making up whatever you want aren’t you?

              “I’m not a plant therefore idk what their nonthinking minds are thinking”

              Who is we in your statement? Pretty sure modern botany understands how plants work and interact.

              • TWeaK@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                That understanding has its limits. We’re just cracking on the ways plants (and fungi) may communicate with one another via external chemical signalling. There are things beyond our current understanding, and how a plant “feels” is completely alien to us. Hell, the function of how people “feel” is still not fully understood.

                My point is that it’s ultimately arbitrary. We feel pain, and we can imagine animals feeling pain in a similar way, because their neurological systems are similar. We assume plants don’t feel pain - and we can confidently say they don’t feel pain the same way we do, but we can’t say they don’t feel pain at all in a way we don’t yet understand.

                Either way though, both plants and animals are living beings, and you are denying them the same opportunity to life by eating them.

        • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 days ago

          Are you stupid? Genuine question, because animals need to eat as well for you to pay someone to murder them. Even going from the assumption that plants suffer too, a plant based diet still causes much fewer plants to die compared to feeding the plants inefficiently to animals to then eat the animals.

          • TWeaK@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Are you stupid? Genuine question

            Liar. You’re just being a dick here. No bother though.

            Like I said before, what matters is what we do before we eat them. Industrial farming practices are where I see the real problems at - and the key thing is that this is an issue for both meant and plant farming.

            Plant based diets can definitely be more efficient, although palm oil is also vegan (and palm oil farming is currently the cause of a massive amount of habitat loss), so just because you have a plant based diet doesn’t mean it’s perfect. But what I’m saying here is that eating plants is not inherently more righteous than eating animals. In practice, it almost certainly is (mainly because of farming practices), but not inherently.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Nah, there are definitely some vegetarian and vegan foods (especially when we’re talking ultraprocessed foods) that are worse for the environment and worse for your health than just plain meat or cheese.

      • SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 days ago

        Genuinely which ones? Everything I can think of is better than meat. Largely because the cows eat a lot of food in the first place with most of it being wasted.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          It’s been a good long while since I made my comparisons but i believe Quorn was worse than chicken (but not as bad as beef obviously). In Sweden we also have Anamma which used to be very good, but at some point they removed their classic formulations and suddenly added like 30% sugar to everything (and doubled the price for good measure). Not sure if they’ve walked that back by now, hopefully they have.

            • mirshafie@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              No, it’s the ultraprocessed stuff that can be pretty bad. But I think a lot of things have happened in the past decade during which there was also a huge focus on sustainability, so I think the market is better now than it used to be. I’m not up to speed anymore.

      • TWeaK@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 days ago

        In the UK there’s a sweet maker called Candy Kittens. They make, like, vegan Haribo (only better) that tastes really really nice.

        They’ve started making their own vegan peanut M&M’s. Instead of chocolate they use a shit ton of palm oil.

        It’s “ethically sourced” palm oil, but that’s still a sour thought after you’ve devoured a whole bag of tasty sweet treats in one sitting. It’s still increasing the market capacity for palm oil, which in turn increases demand to destroy habitats eg orangutans in Indonesia and other SE Asian islands.

        TL;DR palm oil is vegan.

          • TWeaK@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Cocoa is vegan. Chocolate is usually made with milk products to make it more palatable. The chocolate in peanut M&M’s has milk in it, so they are not vegan.

            Except these days milk is largely substituted with palm oil recipes, which is much cheaper, but creates a worse product (often described as waxy) while the industry producing it is tearing down virgin forests for farm land.

            • mirshafie@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Ah, OK. I basically only eat dark chocolate so I forgot that “candy” usually is non-vegan.

            • TWeaK@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              Not sugar, but milk products are typically used to turn cocoa into chocolate.

    • TWeaK@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      we should be demanding sustainability in all our food consumption and respect for all living beings

      Hear hear.

      Plants are living beings, also. The fact is, unless you photosynthesise, you likely have to consume another living being to survive.

      What nearly everyone can agree on is that industrial farming practices are harmful. Not just to the living things we farm, but also to the consumers, who end up consuming a lesser product that is often contaminated by industrial processes that cut corners to save on cost.

    • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      “Super foods” are kind of fucked, and that’s part of being a good vegan—researching and avoiding things that cause harm (as much as practicable). But those are more a thing in wellness clean eating fad diet circles. Most vegan staples are like rice, beans, pulses, and random veggies.

  • MassiveSquid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 days ago

    Vegans don’t want you to not have fun in life. We want you to live your life and let others live theirs, too.

  • voldage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ve had this exact mentality until one day I just stopped eating meat, and generally nothing bad happened to me. It’s not like I miss it, I didn’t lose anything, there’s no sacrifice in my daily life. I just no longer participate in the direct consumption of the product of (still existing and still supported by my work via taxes) the terrible pipeline of infinite suffering, which is something I guess. In the past I’ve also quit smoking and I can tell you dropping animal products from my diet was much easier. So much, it felt underwhelming.

    I don’t tend to talk about it, because I know how my “whining” about meat eating would be perceived, especially remembering how I myself loathed anyone who tried to convince me that eating meat might be bad. It’s just such a silly thing to defend and keep doing. Just gobble up those beans, man. They’re delicious. Leave the cow alone. Organize to overthrow the capital class. Marinate your tofu. Don’t be silly. Kill fascists, not the piggies. Come on.

    • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      My only issue as a vegan is in the social sphere. I always feel like the weird one, or that if someone cooks a meal just for me, I’m taking a lot of space (not too sure how to say this in English). If appreciate the kindness but it makes me feel awkward.

    • wheez@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      My experience was the same, I expected a lot of friction dropping meat, but there was just nothing, which felt almost laughable. I do have friends however that have struggled to drop it, so it varies I guess.

      Dairy and eggs was a bit harder, because it’s included in so many products and dishes I regularly ate. Takes a bit of time and energy, but when the switch is made, I would say its pretty smooth sailing

    • BenjiRenji@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Good on you. I poisoned myself once because I used lemon juice instead of vinagre to lower the ph while making it.

      Stick to the recipe, the ingredients and keep everything clean.

  • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t argue about whether or not people should be vegan. I just know that my quality of life would be vastly diminished as I really don’t enjoy most vegan food. If they can nail lab created meat, I’m all for it.

    • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think you might be shocked how easy it is to eat tasty vegan food, saying you dont enjoy"most vegan food" implies to me that you’ve only had a really limited selection of what’s available. Highly recommend trying ethiopian food.

      • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Ethiopian veggies are great but yebeg wot is on a different level.

        There’s tasty vegan food for sure hut there’s usually a slightly tastier horrifically unethical alternative.

        I agree with op, I think vegans are right, I basically support them but ain’t converting. Realizing they were right on food made me a lot less angry that other people don’t feel the same way I do about sweatshop clothes and they, like me are doing their best. Some prioritise animals in tortorous conditions, others prioritise kids in poor ones, others look after drug addled first worlders, everyone’s got their own moral priorities.

        • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Nobody can force you, all I can really hope for is that you try different vegan food and at least give a shit enough to eat less animals. None of us can be perfect, but we also need to be able to care about multiple causes, and not eating animals is a very easy and tasty one. I care about sweatshop clothes, I care about slave labor in the supply chain for lithium ion batteries, and the genocide in Gaza. I can choose who to vote for and who to shop with and what to eat based on all those goals.

        • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s true we’ve only each got like enough moral bandwidth to champion X number of causes it seems. I still view my goal as doing to most with my capacity though, even if I fall short on most.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      I mean, depending on where you’re from, you can already get most meat products in a convincing non-lab alternative, at least from what I hear from colleagues. (I don’t have an opinion on this, because I don’t like meat. 🫠)

    • Druid@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      I very much doubt it would be unless you’re already artificially limiting what you’re eating

    • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Thanks for your honestly but most food is vegan just with a piece of meat thrown in, or with cheese added on top. If you like those things, you can just sub out the animal part.

      I know arguing over personal taste is a fool’s errand, but your tastes are malleable if you’re ever motivated to challenge yourself.