“While Susan Collins’ campaign is backed by billionaire donors, our campaign is built on a movement funded by the people, with an average donation of $26,” said Graham Platner’s campaign manager.
A new analysis of campaign finance data shows that nearly 100 billionaires and their spouses have contributed to Republican Sen. Susan Collins’ reelection bid so far, funneling nearly $10 million to the incumbent’s campaign committee and PACs supporting her effort to fend off progressive challenger Graham Platner.
The Maine Monitor on Thursday published a list of billionaires who have donated to Collins and Platner, who has called his Republican opponent a “corrupt” protector and beneficiary of an oligarchic political system.
The outlet noted that Collins’ billionaire donation total “stands in stark contrast with the fundraising of her opponent… whose campaign has mostly attracted smaller amounts of funds but from many more people.”
To them, losing the “progressives can’t win purple states” narrative would be a catastrophe.
Not only can progressives win in purple states, I bet they can win in these supposedly “red” states that have been abandoned by the Dems in recent years. Progressive takeover of the Democratic Party needs to happen ASAP.
I agree. I don’t think the actual silent majority thinks “that guy’s too far right” or “that lady’s too far left,” they ask “which one’s gonna help with my problems?”
Just look at all the special elections earlier in the year that flipped seats. They’re definitely scared we’re waking up
We need a Left version of the Tea Party
And we need it fast. No time for steeping. Call it the Espresso Party!
The tea party was an astroturfing campaign…
What’s astroturfing?
It’s when big money funds a “grass roots” campaign. In the case of the tea party the Koch brothers bankrolled that project.
Thank
People in those red states will never vote for anyone with a ‘D’ next to their name, no matter how much they agree with them.
Asking honestly… how do we do this?
I’m no strategist but: Primaries, local organizing with progressive supporters, and refusing to play the “civility politics” game that so many conservatives and neoliberals love to play. Be progressive and don’t apologize for it.
Do they ever apologize? No, they don’t. We don’t either.
Vote in every dem primary for the progressive candidate, campaign for the progressive candidate, run as the progressive candidate. Vote in every primary and every general.
I think it’s already happening. People are tired of the current leadership who have proven themselves deaf to the needs of the working class. They’ve just been stringing people along with performativism and virtue signaling, but people have definitely woken up to that in recent years.
Also, establishment Dems’ catastrophic failures in last election followed by a series of progressive wins is a good signal. Progressives are demonstrating their electability, and that momentum will only build from here on. It will become increasingly harder for Democratic Party leadership to stifle the progressive caucus.
Also, the new DNC chairman is at least nominally progressive. We’ll see how he does in two years. Till then all we can do is hope and wait and vote.
In 1936, Roosevelt was elected despite millionaires pouring money into Hoover’s campaign.
Voting is important.
If it wasn’t, they wouldn’t make it so hard to vote or try to stop you. It unfortunately isn’t very effective when people are complacent. But when people are pissed, even stacked decks and rigging won’t hold ultimately.
That’s why perpetual whiplash is baked into the system. People get complacent when things are going good, which is when the opposition’s momentum is at its strongest.
4-8 years later the other side is the one that gets complacent as their opposition gets fired up.
Rinse and repeat.
The algorithm is simple. Watch who the billionaires back, then vote for the other option.
Removed by mod
It would be nice to have a post-conflict plan TBH. But yeah, whatever the plan, that would be step 1
post conflict plan is socialist reconstruction & infrastructure but most liberals aren’t ready to accept that yet, they’d rather have oligarchy because it means they won’t have to give up their gentrified apartment
Honestly, I think the 2nd biggest reason for the opposition to socialism, is change. People don’t like breaking habit, even if it is extremely bad for them. Better the demon you know, than a angel you don’t.
No, you see, when I’m in charge, everything will be peachy! It’s the other oligarchs that are the problem.
It’s socialism or barbarism but they got you thinking they are the same things
They got you thinking it would be socialism.
Seems like a short sighted plan. Not much changed after what happened to the CEO of UHC insurance.
Maybe not long term, but there was a noticeable uptick in claims being approved from what I recall. Whether you think Luigi was right or wrong, it’s hard to deny people are alive today because of him.
Removed by mod
It’s cute you think the problem can be solved by wiping them out. You’re either naive or ignorant to the way things work. Either way I don’t want to be a part of this conversation anymore so I’ll just stop completely with my noise.
a solution without wiping them out won’t solve the problem.
I call it the house cleaning fallacy. “Cleaning the house doesn’t solve the problem of things getting dirty”
Exactly. I feel like a lot of the people who are not in agreement with me on this issue are being short sited and impractical.
Removed by mod
It directly resulted in thousands of claims being granted that would otherwise have been denied, literally saving thousands of lives. It got my dad’s heart surgery approved.
“But we need someone electable, someone both sides like!”
Yeah no, the “both sides” these people are referring to is the defensive and offensive wing of the same group.
You cant win elections appealing to “both sides”.
You can, if you’re appealing to the 1% of each side
How do we/ why would we appeal to people who are literally a combination of mind-bogglingly corrupt Traitors, Racists, and Pedophiles? What kind of a compromise do you cut with them? They are only allowed to do a little graft, treason, racism, and child raping? Just regulate it, to keep it at a reasonable level?
MAGA needs to be mercilessly crushed, and purged from our government and society. They don’t get to contribute to the future of America. We allowed them to do that after the Civil War, and it led to this. We can’t make that mistake again.
MAGAs rise and reign has been ugly, and we need to make their decline and demise even uglier, so future generations will learn harsh lessons from it.
Let’s interview everyone that has a grudge with Susan Collins.
No? We can only interview every ex girlfriend, guy that’s willing to say something negative, and Republican friend of a friend that knows the grassroots guy. Huh, I wonder why.
They are absolutely terrified of Platner taxing them aren’t they?
I think that tells us all we need to know.
I wonder if they’re feeling what we felt with Trump where no matter how many truths we told about his scandals he kept going. The difference this time is that it’s democrats and republicans lying and trying to manufacture scandals, but it’s not slowing him down.
Hell yeah Maine, tax those terrorists!
Far less to do with that than with Republicans control of the Senate potentially hinging on her seat.
BUT these Billionaires CARE about Us! THATS why they’re FORCING us to Invest ALL OUR RETIREMENT into Their Companies so they can be Trillionaires!
Planter was the only candidate whose website had the word “genocide” so he got my vote
Hey, now. Susan Collins is very concerned about all the billionaire money in politics. Very concerned. Almost very, very concerned. Right on the edge.
She’s not happy about it, but in the end, after wrestling with her conscience, she will take their money, but she’s not happy about it, and she’ll do whatever they tell her to do, but she’s not happy about it.
She must be a very unhappy woman.
Those pearls don’t clutch themselves.
Yet tankies will still continue to focus their vitriol on Platner…
He’s problematic, maybe? Probably? What he isn’t is Susan “he’s learned his lesson” Collins.
Waiting for a perfect candidate with a squeaky clean record is an exercise in futility.
The only way someone gets old enough to run for political office while having enough knowledge and experience to actually be capable of doing the job, without having ever made any mistakes that one’s opponents can dig up for their mudslinging campaigns, is to take no risks, be non-controversial, a chameleon, totally performative and insincere. That’s how you end up with these robotic-sounding DNC stars.
What’s important is whether someone learned from their mistakes and has shown themselves capable of improving. There’s this weird essentialist idea floating around in people’s heads that once someone has made a mistake, that mistake is fundamentally who they are as a person and they should be judged for it for the rest of their lives. And honestly, if that mentality takes root and grows, it could lead to a very dystopian world. It’s just one more part to add to the total surveillance state we’re already sliding towards.
I mean the dude got a nazi tattoo. Not an ambiguous thing, an exclusively and extremely recognizable nazi tattoo. The amount of stupid required to do that without knowing it was a nazi tattoo, or anyone in your circle who’s seen it over the years, is incredibly concerning. So given the choice between he knowingly got a nazi tattoo and lied or he and everyone around him is too dumb to recognize like the third or fourth most recognizable nazi symbol, well he’s probably still better than Susan Collins. But nobody accidentally gets a nazi tattoo.
A nazi tattoo that hardly anyone knew was a nazi symbol until the story about him spread around? I for one didn’t know what it was until I read about him.
Does that make me “too dumb to recognize like the third or fourth most recognizable nazi symbol”? I guarantee you I’m not the only one.
“extremely recognizable” is a huge stretch.
I mean if you’ve ever covered nazi Germany in a history class you’ve seen the totenkopf. If you’ve seen popular media featuring Nazis you’ve seen the totenkopf. It’s distinctive from any other skull or crossbone pirate imagery which is the excuse I keep hearing. If you’ve played the wolfenstein remake the fucking bag guy is literally called deaths head. Yeah, if you’re totally unaware that the totenkopf is well known and exclusively Nazi symbol, and you tattoo it on yourself at a tattoo parlor willing to give Nazi tattoos, and everyone in your life that sees it for the decade plus you are displaying it, then absolutely you and all those people that saw and also didn’t know are stupid. You cannot get a Nazi tattoo by accident unless you’re really really really fucking dumb.
I mean if you’ve ever covered nazi Germany in a history class you’ve seen the totenkop
That’s a stretch. I don’t recall ever seeing a totenkopf in a history textbook. Maybe if you majored in history with a focus in WWII, but that’s not the majority of people.
If you’ve seen popular media featuring Nazis you’ve seen the totenkopf.
I don’t think I’ve ever noticed one portrayed in any media depicting nazis either. Inglorious Bastards? Sound of Music? The Pianist? It’s a Beautiful Life? Schindler’s List? Boy in the Striped Pajamas? Show me a screenshot from any of those movies that has a totenkopf.
If you’ve played the wolfenstein remake […]
How many people is that? Oh, not the majority. Great.
Yeah, if you’re totally unaware that the totenkopf is well known and exclusively Nazi symbol
I wasn’t aware of that until I read about it in the context of Platner.
and you tattoo it on yourself
I wouldn’t have anyway because I think it looks stupid.
at a tattoo parlor willing to give Nazi tattoos
I don’t think those kinds of parlors exactly advertise themselves as such.
and everyone in your life that sees it for the decade plus you are displaying it
You still haven’t convinced me that the majority of people even know what it is.
then absolutely you and all those people that saw and also didn’t know are stupid.
I guess I’m stupid then.
You cannot get a Nazi tattoo by accident unless you’re really really really fucking dumb.
I don’t have any tattoos, but I can still see how someone might have walked into a tattoo shop, picked something out of their catalog and gotten it without researching the history or symbolism behind it. It’s not that crazy to believe.
I learned about the fuckin thing in grade school history in the goddamn rural Midwest. You’re just saying that most people are really stupid. You’ve got a big fuckin blind spot for fascist imagery and it’s got you doing nazi apologism. Ignorance isn’t a goddamn excuse in a lot of situations and this is one of them. Nobody accidentally gets a nazi tattoo because it’s not fuckin easy to find a tattoo shop that tolerates nazi imagery in the first place and the ones that do are fuckin nazi shops. Ignorance does not get to be an excuse for tattooing a goddamn death’s head on you. No. If you knew anything about tattoo culture you’d know him getting in the first place very nearly guarantees he knew what it was. I’d still prefer him over Susan Collins but he’s either lying or really fucking dumb and these are the only two options. Or he was forced to join a prison gang, so I guess three options but I’m pretty sure it’s not the third. It is impossible to accidentally get a nazi tattoo.
Since I went browsing around, here are some images for comparison:
Yes, it’s a specific design and you should be careful with skulls but I’m not sure we should demand that everyone recognize the difference. I wouldn’t have until now if I’d seen them as line drawings. In embossed silver, sure…
I think we should. Because you don’t accidentally get a nazi tattoo because any shop willing to do nazi tats very quickly and rightfully gets a reputation as a nazi shop, and if you’re seeing a death’s head in their flash you’re seeing more nazi imagery. So he would have had to miss all of that. And everyone who ever saw it would have also had to have been unaware, and again despite your lack of awareness it’s incredibly recognizable as an exclusively nazi symbol, it’s up there with the iron cross right behind ss runes and the swastika. It’s right there on the ss caps. The fuckin Mitchell and Webb “are we the baddies” sketch that everyone memes shows it front and center. It is not an ambiguous symbol and he’s either lying about knowing what it was or really stupid. He’s still better than Collins, but you don’t accidentally get a nazi tattoo and I’m kinda tired of everyone minimizing this like it’s no big fuckin deal. He gets the benefit of the doubt but everyone should be keeping him under a fucking microscope for any fuckery whatsoever.
I mean if you’re an ex drug addict you shouldn’t be Secretary of health. I think at some point we’ve gone too far.
I think RFK jr. shouldn’t be Secretary of Health because he’s anti-science, anti-vaccine, anti-handwashing, anti-public health, believes raw milk and red meat are good for you, eats roadkill, swims in raw sewage, and brags about doing coke off of public bathroom toilet seats. I’m sure I missed a few points, too.
Being a former drug addict doesn’t factor into it. Some of the kindest, most caring, self-aware, and health-focused people I know are former drug addicts. People can turn their lives around, and climbing out of a mountain-deep hole is as big of an accomplishment as climbing a mountain.
The fact that you’re trying to conflate RFK jr.'s being-a-drug-addict with his being-a-disgusting-unqualified-piece-of-shit is very problematic and reveals a lot about you as a person.
We need term limits in Congress.
You need a lot more than that, American
billionaires who made their money in alternative investments, including hedge funds and private equity."
Wut. Since when are hedge funds alternative investments?
They’re alternative to any investments we’re allowed to make. All we can do is stick our money in the bank for .5% interest with inflation over 4%, or toss our money into the stock market whirlpool for the wealthy to swallow.
ETFs, mutual funds, forex, precious metals, cryptocurrency…
She’s been strongly pro-war all along and that is a huge money making venture.
Her fucking husband is a lobbyist whose job before that was as a lobbyist for weapons manufacturers.
Before all that, he was her mentor in politics, in case you wondered if every goddamn Republican was grooming someone at some point.
A traitor to the United States of America.
















